Match Thread Coventry v Fleetwood Match Thread - Saturday 21st Jan (1 Viewer)

Great_Expectations · Jan 21, 2017

Any team news?

Nick · Jan 21, 2017

Hows the pitch looking?

lifeskyblue · Jan 21, 2017

No team news I've heard. Pitch doesn't look too bad at all

PUSB
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

ccfchoi87 · Jan 21, 2017

Stevenson starts

ccfchoi87 · Jan 21, 2017

#CCFC XI: Burge (GK), Willis (C), Rawson, Turnbull, Clarke, Haynes, Stevenson, Reilly, Rose, G.Thomas, Beavon. #PUSB

3-5-2 unless Haynes lm

stevefloyd · Jan 21, 2017

Wheres Stokes? still injured again?

Nick · Jan 21, 2017

Willis as Wing Back?

stevefloyd · Jan 21, 2017

At least he's given up hope on Tudgay

lifeskyblue · Jan 21, 2017

Looking ok at back but not convinced by the midfield or attack.

PUSB
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Great_Expectations · Jan 21, 2017

Nick said:
Willis as Wing Back?

Awful decision.

Nick · Jan 21, 2017

Is it Thomas left and Rose right?

Terry Gibson's perm · Jan 21, 2017

Does he not know it's a home game.

Earlsdon_Skyblue1 · Jan 21, 2017

Looks like the plan is to keep it tight and not concede. Nick a 1-0.

skybluegod · Jan 21, 2017

Terry Gibson's perm said:
Does he not know it's a home game.

Won't matter if we win will it.

Decent team, still shows lac k of options at the front end of the pitch but still 10/11 days left of transfer window

lifeskyblue · Jan 21, 2017

Tudguy is out couple weeks with thigh strain. He was in the family zone

PUSB
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

skyblueelephant76 · Jan 21, 2017

If Haynes is playing leftmid it sort of makes sense, otherwise that's a strange line-up

Nick · Jan 21, 2017

skyblueelephant76 said:
If Haynes is playing leftmid it sort of makes sense, otherwise that's a strange line-up

Wouldn't that mean Turnbull or Clarke at left back?

Terry Gibson's perm · Jan 21, 2017

skybluegod said:
Won't matter if we win will it.

Decent team, still shows lac k of options at the front end of the pitch but still 10/11 days left of transfer window

Of course but to win you have to score, I think he sets up to not let one in and steal one but we always let them in.

Terry Gibson's perm · Jan 21, 2017

Nick said:
Wouldn't that mean Turnbull or Clarke at left back?

Get me some rope

Terry Gibson's perm · Jan 21, 2017

lifeskyblue said:
Tudguy is out couple weeks with thigh strain. He was in the family zone

PUSB
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Hope it's longer best news I have had this week

skyblueelephant76 · Jan 21, 2017

Nick said:
Wouldn't that mean Turnbull or Clarke at left back?

Turnbull played left back for Swindon for quite a while. It does look like 3 at the back and wingbacks though. We know how successful that's been this season...

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

wingy · Jan 21, 2017

We get the dulcet tones of "Bodaks the name, goals are the game ",on CWR this afternoon.
Never forget that third goal screamer of his over Joe Corrigan (edit due to memory) in that league cup game at Main Rd, late seventies or the blood running down my neck from the belt buckle over my head on the way back to the car.

ccfchoi87 · Jan 21, 2017

Burge
Willis Clarke Rawson Turnbull
Rose Reilly Stevenson Haynes
Thomas Beavon

Rawson can also play anywhere accross the back 4

Great_Expectations · Jan 21, 2017

skyblueelephant76 said:
Turnbull played left back for Swindon for quite a while. It does look like 3 at the back and wingbacks though. We know how successful that's been this season...

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

Turnbull doesn't have the right attributes to play left back. Equally Willis doesn't to play RWB. Is Venus still picking the team?

sw88 · Jan 21, 2017

Willis at rb is bad enough but wing back? Shit a brick!

Otis · Jan 21, 2017

sw88 said:
Willis at rb is bad enough but wing back? Shit a brick!

Can only hope his wing back instruction is moving sideways from the centre of the defence to the wing and then back again.

To the wing, back. Wing, back. Wing back. Wing, back.

Otis · Jan 21, 2017

ccfchoi87 said:
Burge
Willis Clarke Rawson Turnbull
Rose Reilly Stevenson Haynes
Thomas Beavon

Rawson can also play anywhere accross the back 4

Yeah. Could be CWR getting it wrong.

Go figure.

ccfchoi87 · Jan 21, 2017

Otis said:
Yeah. Could be CWR getting it wrong.

Go figure.

It could be either tbh, I hadn't realised CWR said 3-5-2 they'll probably be right

Otis · Jan 21, 2017

ccfchoi87 said:
It could be either tbh, I hadn't realised CWR said 3-5-2 they'll probably be right

CWR didn't say 3-5-2. It was something like 3-2-3-1-2-1-2

Otis · Jan 21, 2017

3-4-1-2.

Geoff Foster just said it again.

He may well be wrong. I doubt Slade would tell CWR what his formation was going to be in advance.

skyblueelephant76 · Jan 21, 2017

It's definitely 5 at the back, that's how they are warming up on the pitch now.

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

skybluegod · Jan 21, 2017

6-0 win, Willis with 4, Turnbull with the other 2.

stevefloyd · Jan 21, 2017

lifeskyblue said:
Tudguy is out couple weeks with thigh strain. He was in the family zone

PUSB
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

How the fuck has he managed to strain anything...the big useless inept fucking twat

Earlsdon_Skyblue1 · Jan 21, 2017

CWR indicated it was Rose playing directly behined the two strikers; Beavon and Thomas.

As was said however, I doubt Slade had a cup of tea and a custard cream with Geoff before the game, so fuck knows how accurate that is.

Grendel · Jan 21, 2017

Wing back system works well already - left side will be a nightmare

Match Thread Coventry v Fleetwood Match Thread - Saturday 21st Jan (1 Viewer)

Well-Known Member

Administrator

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Administrator

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Administrator

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Administrator

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Chief Commentator!

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Users who are viewing this thread

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency