It is but if you are saying the only way this stadium an be viable is via promotion. What was those three players contribution like when we were showing promotion form?
It is but if you are saying the only way this stadium an be viable is via promotion. What was those three players contribution like when we were showing promotion form?
Yeovil got promoted on less than Clarke, baker and murphy altogether..
The exception that proves nothing.
It proves it can be done, you dullard.An exception that proves nothing.
For each example of a side getting promoted on a relatively low budget they'll be quite a few that got demoted with low budgets.
Budgets are statistically relevant when it comes to the chances of promotion/demotion.
Yeovil got promoted on less than Clarke, baker and murphy altogether..
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
And some on here did not want to entertain the idea if Gary Johnson as manager
It proves it can be done, you dullard.
There are exceptions of course.
However if you are basing your whole business plan for the future of the club on building a new stadium that can only make profit if we get promoted to the premiership. You probably want to be the norm not the exception
Maybe you don't understand statistics?
I'm basing my view on the views and research expounded in this book, http://www.amazon.co.uk/The-Numbers-Game-Everything-Football/dp/0670922242&tag=skblta-21
And all you do is use insulting language.
Yes, reading Soccernomics at the minute, 90% league position based on wage bill, the amount of transfer fund makes little difference. I believe the research was focused on the top 2 leagues across the bigger leagues in Europe, where there's more money sloshing around.
Still leaves 10% where a good manager can influence things, Swansea did it, Yeovil did it, we can do it. Especially out of this league.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
Yes, reading Soccernomics at the minute, 90% league position based on wage bill, the amount of transfer fund makes little difference. I believe the research was focused on the top 2 leagues across the bigger leagues in Europe, where there's more money sloshing around.
Still leaves 10% where a good manager can influence things, Swansea did it, Yeovil did it, we can do it. Especially out of this league.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
A bad manager can also influence things, as has been seen many times in the past here.
We're not getting promoted to the PL anytime soon.
Let's look at it this why, the season we got relegated, promoted Southampton, west ham and Reading all had wage bills circa x3 our entire turnover.
I don't think spending £17-19m+ than our turnover in the hope of gaining promotion to the PL is a particularly good business strategy either
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
Maybe you don't understand statistics?
I'm basing my view on the views and research expounded in this book, http://www.amazon.co.uk/The-Numbers-Game-Everything-Football/dp/0670922242&tag=skblta-21
And all you do is use insulting language.
Does it prove it can be done or not? Or are you saying that we continue to get even more indebted to ARVO?
Is it 1.8 million in interest a season to them?
I don't know. The club can't afford the interest never mind the overall debt.
Does it prove it can be done or not? Or are you saying that we continue to get even more indebted to ARVO?
Does it prove it can be done or not? Or are you saying that we continue to get even more indebted to ARVO?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?