Wright has no right (pun intended) to be upset. Been piss poor since we played Sheff Wed where he scored an offside goal. Doesn’t try hard enough.Yeah. Well sort of. No close up of it, but you could see it happening in the background
Wright has no right (pun intended) to be upset. Been piss poor since we played Sheff Wed where he scored an offside goal. Doesn’t try hard enough.
You'd be mad to take the Stoke price - not that we can't win, but awful odds.Bookies still backing City
Favs for automatic promo.
8/13 favs to beat Sheff Utd.
5/4 favs to win at Stoke.
Time and inactivity has not been good to them.Accompanied by the sky blue belles half time show
After the Dr Hook tribute act.What time are The Enemy on?
Who told you that? Sylvia's mother?After the Dr Hook tribute act.
wouldn’t worry too much, theyv’e only scored 10 and conceded 23, not getting over confident but it’s a perfect game for us after Friday, gonna be a great atmosphere as well, first midweek game under the lights, and there’s always a bit more on this game,I am not particularly looking forward to this one tbh - The Enemy thing is a great thing in theory but have a feeling it is gonna distract from the game somewhat and the atmosphere might well peak before kick off
Also resigned myself to the fact the greasy little turncoat is gonna score, for how bad they have been this season he seems to have added more goals to his game, especially since Sourpuss went back there
Well it is Thanksgiving seasonTurkey??
They are a fanbase with an vastly overinflated opinion of themselves, their middle aged adult fans have in their lifetime lived to see us win a major trophy and never their own club yet constantly harp on about how they are the vastly superior club in every aspectLike most of our fans, I strongly, strongly dislike Sheffield Utd. Horrible club with a tosser of a manager and a group of arrogant players.
think we keep it as it is, torp and grimes back in the middle and Asante over Eccles, it’s worked brilliant so far, no need to change itView attachment 46940
Assuming Torp, Eccles and Thomas are fit, I’d start with this personally although debated Simms for Wright.
Think Eccles would allow us to retain the ball more and he did well in this role against Birmingham. Really hope Rudoni is on the bench and can get some minutes
No Hamer either. Whatever anyone says about his form this season there is no way they aren't immediately better with him back in the team. There's not much to them without him. O'Hare seems to be the danger man! Their fans have been saying Campbell is a shadow of last season (similar to what they are saying about Hamer) and the rest of the team is generally just downgrades on the players that were there last season. Whereas under Lampard we've only lost 2 home games, to last seasons top 2, and should probably have 4 players that were missing on Friday coming back into the team. I can only see one outcome really...wouldn’t worry too much, theyv’e only scored 10 and conceded 23, not getting over confident but it’s a perfect game for us after Friday, gonna be a great atmosphere as well, first midweek game under the lights, and there’s always a bit more on this game,
Nice optimistic way of looking at itwouldn’t worry too much, theyv’e only scored 10 and conceded 23, not getting over confident but it’s a perfect game for us after Friday, gonna be a great atmosphere as well, first midweek game under the lights, and there’s always a bit more on this game,
Kieffer Moore had scored 1 in 7 till last Friday…We should be comfortably beating these. They're a much worse side than they were last season and no Hamer tomorrow. As others have said the primary threat is O'Hare, but if we sack off the 2-man midfield then we should have more than enough to cut him out of the game.
Also they're crap away from home having only scored 6 goals in 7 games, while picking up 6 points.
Kieffer Moore had scored 1 in 7 till last Friday…
I think that we had too many changes imposed on a winning formula. Namely a two man midfield, one of whom is 5th choice, and 3/4 of the defence. Pinning it all on Woolf’s performance is harsh in my opinion.True, but that doesn't detract from the fact that this is a winnable game and we should have enough to get 3 points.
Really we lost the game due to an individual horror show from Wolfenden. If you give any forward that amount of space at this level you're going to get punished.
I don't really expect too many of those this season, hopefully.
I think that we had too many changes imposed on a winning formula. Namely a two man midfield, one of whom is 5th choice, and 3/4 of the defence. Pinning it all on Woolf’s performance is harsh in my opinion.
Sakamoto played a superb game, Grimes did what he does, but nobody else really stepped up. Including the manager I dare say who really should have plugged the midfield at HT when we led against the run of play.
I feel filthy.....but I'm even more interested now.....Time and inactivity has not been good to them.
Now known as the Sky Blue Bellies.
I think Haji has suffered since we’ve gone to 4-4-2 but BTA has thrived so it’s a conundrum as to what we do. Simms was unlucky to be dropped in the first place so think it makes sense putting him back in. If not on Tuesday, definitely away at Stoke.This belongs on the Wrexham thread as much as here but we were overly focused on the long ball out l. Need to mix it up a bit. Robins would have been cross
I wonder if Haji Wright is suited to being target man for long balls. He prefers it to his feet. May explain his ineffectiveness lately
We looked better once da silva and torp on. They have to start. Beginning to feel the absence of rudoni.
Woolfenden did not impress. He looked expensive for cover, Premiership experience or not. KKH is clearly very technically gifted just not MVE.
Hopefully Frank will be able to play his best team bar Rudoni. However I would be tempted to play simms
Could be said they are mediocre without hamer?....No Hamer either. Whatever anyone says about his form this season there is no way they aren't immediately better with him back in the team. There's not much to them without him. O'Hare seems to be the danger man! Their fans have been saying Campbell is a shadow of last season (similar to what they are saying about Hamer) and the rest of the team is generally just downgrades on the players that were there last season. Whereas under Lampard we've only lost 2 home games, to last seasons top 2, and should probably have 4 players that were missing on Friday coming back into the team. I can only see one outcome really...
City 0-2 Blunts
I think that might be very kind based on this seasons performances.Could be said they are mediocre without hamer?....
friday wasn’t that suprising was it but it starts to put a little bit of doubt in your mind, need a good win Tuesday and put another unbeaten run togetherNice optimistic way of looking at it
Think it’s harsh to pin the result on him, not to criticise his individual performance which was poor. Kitching was also guilty of standing and staring first half, just his errors weren’t punished.Why? I don't really think it's that harsh at all really, it was an objectively appalling performance during the second half.
Granted it's difficult coming in as a CB in an unfamiliar backline and both Bidwell and KKH were both poor (especially Bidwell) but for the second and third goal he categorically should've done better.
If in another universe Thomas had been playing we probably wouldn't have lost the game.
Perhaps. Woolf and KKH have both joined us from Group 1, but the rest of the defence are in Group 4. So we’ve got two players trying to form ionic bonds with a mostly covalent defence.KKH and Wolfenden will come good over time, at this point, the issues are probably chemistry related.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?