Sorry have to disagree, only one slower than Lati is Sky Blue Sam, and I think he would still give him a run for his moneyHigh line shouldn’t be a problem against these lot. Frey isn’t a bad striker but he’s probably even slower than Lati
Which means EMC is definitely on the bench.
Who else, Wilson, Allen, Ecccles, Binks, Sakamoto, Raphael, Bassette probably.
Still one more seat?
January Championship player of the month nominee too.I love that the majority assume the captain from the last few games, including a 5 game winning run, is going to be dropped. Consider, this is not only a tactical decision but a man-management/squad morale decision. Some players, not just Allen, might be unimpressed. I would tread carefully if I were FL.
It may be the right decision but it is not without downsides.
I love that the majority assume the captain from the last few games, including a 5 game winning run, is going to be dropped. Consider, this is not only a tactical decision but a man-management/squad morale decision. Some players, not just Allen, might be unimpressed. I would tread carefully if I were FL.
It may be the right decision but it is not without downsides.
Torp & Grimes will start. Can't see Rudoni being rested for Allen though. Rumours that Binks may start at LB/LWB thoughDoubt FL would have started Allen in both the last 2 matches, and given him 75 minutes against Ipswich, if he was going to start against QPR.
The new athletic Simms!1 up top
New Captain
Lati, Allen, BTA dropped
This is a real full football season, plus a very lean squad due to injuries, and a new player who needs to learn to work with his new teammates. I think JA is a good enough pro that he understands the fundamental concept of rotation.I love that the majority assume the captain from the last few games, including a 5 game winning run, is going to be dropped. Consider, this is not only a tactical decision but a man-management/squad morale decision. Some players, not just Allen, might be unimpressed. I would tread carefully if I were FL.
It may be the right decision but it is not without downsides.
So it sounds like...1 up top
New Captain
Lati, Allen, BTA dropped
1 up top
New Captain
Lati, Allen, BTA dropped
Calm down people - it's a 4-1 win. My first game at Highfield road in 1977 (I was a Liverpool fan at the time) we won 4-1. I had a very vivid dream about the game. 2 nights ago...so I'm lumping a tenner on it.
Actually, having given it as bit more thought, I also made sure it was my eldest sons 1st game at Highfield road (he's a Man Utd fan) and we lost 2-1 in 2005 and also my daughters 1st game we won 1-0 in 2010. So I've downgraded from a tenner to 50p.
Basically 3 points in the bag - stop manifesting a loss negative people!!!
"You was a Liverpool fan"
So what made you change, just interested.
I'd rather lose a leg than change allegiance.
All change!1 up top
New Captain
Lati, Allen, BTA dropped
Going to have ask, four or five at the back?1 up top
New Captain
Lati, Allen, BTA dropped
1 up top
New Captain
Lati, Allen, BTA dropped
Wouldn’t mind the box but you’d have to take out Allen to match Saddles news, maybe we could play Eccles there?Is this changes from the weekend or last weeks game?
could it be
dovin
MVE Thomas Kitching Binks JDS
Grimes allen
Rudoni torp
Simms
in a box
Could play Rudoni centre and Rapha on the wing. Torp plays alongside Grimes?4-2-3-1?
MVE - Thomas - Kitching - Binks
Grimes - Eccles
Sakamoto - Torp - Rudoni
Simms
Lamps dropping a curveball with a back 4 and Rafael starting?
Could play Rudoni centre and Rapha on the wing. Torp plays alongside Grimes?
That's more plausible actually.4-2-3-1?
MVE - Thomas - Kitching - Binks
Grimes - Eccles
Sakamoto - Torp - Rudoni
Simms
I can’t see us not playing 5 at the back
more likely4-2-3-1?
MVE - Thomas - Kitching - Binks
Grimes - Eccles
Sakamoto - Torp - Rudoni
Simms
Would be worried playing a back 4 if Da Silva is LBI can’t see us not playing 5 at the back
more likely
Lati-Thomas or Binks- Kitching
MVE-Allen-Grimes-JDS
Torp-Rudi
Simms
3-4-2-1 is okay as long as the 10s can support the forward5 at the back, and 1 up top, would be a disaster against these.
yeah, as it's unlikely we switch from a 5 just yetBox then?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?