Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Match Thread Coventry City - Queens Park Rangers Match Thread - Saturday 23rd Aug (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter Nick
  • Start date Aug 18, 2025
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
First Prev 29 of 29

Jamesimus

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 24, 2025
  • #981
chiefdave said:
He was the only one who looked bothered. He looked ready to go at some of his teammates at some points in the game.
Click to expand...
Looked their best player imo.
 
Reactions: Gibbo

Joe King

Fairly well known member from Malvern
  • Aug 24, 2025
  • #982
shmmeee said:
Just trying to do a bit of “maths isn’t scary really it’s just describing the world around us”. May still be in maths teacher mode form my kids exam revision sessions.
Click to expand...
No offence meant regarding xg stuff. It's just that I'm starting my 62nd year of watching the city and football in general. (I'm now 72) Never have I, or anyone else I know, have ever bothered with these sort of statistics. It's the same watching a game on tv. I can't be arsed knowing how many touches a player has made or what percentage of the ball play a team has had etc. I just want to enjoy the game without the waffle and constant showing of ( to me), meaningless statistics.
Anyway, rant over. Enjoy the rest of the season. It's been an amazing start!
 
Reactions: Old Warwickshire lad, MaltaSkyBlue, robbiethemole and 4 others

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 24, 2025
  • #983
shmmeee said:
Big Chance just meant over 1 in 4 chance of going in. It’s totally arbitrary.
Click to expand...

Apparently Sakamoto had 0.7-0.8 xG over two chances v Hull, one chance being over 0.5 xG… I can’t recall 2 such chances.

It’s not an arbitrary measure, there’s clearly a mathematic formula behind it.
 

Joy Division

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 24, 2025
  • #984
lifeskyblue said:
He was their only player who looked up for the game.
Click to expand...
He was awful
 

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 24, 2025
  • #985
 
Reactions: Briles, Skyblueweeman, Lamps and 5 others

JulianDarbyFTW

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 24, 2025
  • #986
We're also the leading scorers in the EPL, even though L1 and L2 have played 2 more games..!
 

fatso

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 24, 2025
  • #987
SomersetSB said:
I bet the Oxford defence are looking forward to next weekend, another 5?🩵
Click to expand...
I think they'll park the bus!

Could be harder than people think.
 
Reactions: Evo1883, commissioner_gordon and CovRes

Tommo1993

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 24, 2025
  • #988
Evo1883 said:
Click to expand...

Imagine if we managed to score against Hull.
 
Reactions: Mucca Mad Boys, Evo1883 and CovRes

Nick

Administrator
  • Aug 24, 2025
  • #989
Samueljames1991 said:
Is that when we scored after 7 seconds or something?
Click to expand...
 
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 24, 2025
  • #990
Danceswithhorses said:
Been out all day at a bbq and missed the match (doh !!), but followed the game on my mobile via goal alerts.
There were so many of those, that my battery almost died lol
Just watched the highlights, and to be honest, we could have had 10, due partly to our great play, but also QPR's awful defending.
My thoughts :

-Top scorer last year was Wright (striker) with 12.
At this rate, we could not only have a couple of strikers beating that, but we could also have 2 midfielders with more than that as well.
That's extraordinary really, and makes you wonder how insanely valuable, Frank's midfielder knowledge and experience is.
Both Rudoni and Torp have improved immeasurably under Frank, Joe, and the coaching team.
Torp's 2nd goal today was filthy.

-Matt Grimes for £3m is looking like an absolute bargain.
He looked like he controlled the game today, with his usual understated style and coolness on the ball. He's such a good link player between defence and midfield. I don't think there's a better player in his position, in this division.

-BTA is improving, game by game, and surprising many of us. Keep it up BTA
Excellent goal today, and used his immense upper body strength, to set up Wright's 2nd goal.

-And finally...the club and ground are reunited.
That's something i didn't think i'd see again my life time (i'm in my 50s)

I have to say, DK has done a cracking job as owner, even more so when you compare him to the inept SISU clowns who owned us previously.
How can one owner be so bad, and another be so successful (so far at least) ?
The main concern in my mind, is whether DK sticks to his 5 year plan and sells up...in which case buying the stadium is a smart move, as that asset (when added to a successful team), will greatly improve the club's value, and be attractive to a prospective new owner.
Or will his (so far) successful time at Coventry, turn him into a real fan, and encourage him to stick with us.
Personally, based on his record so far, i'd want him to stay, due mostly to the numerous squad and infrastructure improvements that he's instigated.
He also seems an honest and likeable chap.
New wealthy/foreign owners sounds great, but they don't always work out well...just ask Wednesday fans.
Click to expand...
Well I'd say it was a classic example of after conceding the first,still going for it, not very well though!
 
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 24, 2025
  • #991
Tommo1993 said:
Imagine if we managed to score against Hull.
Click to expand...
Slow starters.
 

Tommo1993

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 24, 2025
  • #992
wingy said:
Slow starters.
Click to expand...

I’d leave and try another restaurant mate
 
Reactions: Matt smith, Captain Dart and wingy

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 24, 2025
  • #993
Mucca Mad Boys said:
Apparently Sakamoto had 0.7-0.8 xG over two chances v Hull, one chance being over 0.5 xG… I can’t recall 2 such chances.

It’s not an arbitrary measure, there’s clearly a mathematic formula behind it.
Click to expand...

It’s a proprietary formula is the problem. Some companies account for defender positions some don’t. Some take their baseline stats from similar leagues some don’t. And we don’t know which is which or what a site is using. But the general theory is sound and it clearly helps scouts and has some level of predictive power.

I don’t think yesterday is an example of xG being wrong, our first dive shots on goal all went in. One was massively deflected, we hit an absolute screamer for one second half. Their keeper had a proper mare. It doesn’t take away from us, but in another game with and other keeper it could easily have been fewer goals and outside the goals we didn’t create lots of clear cut chances that we missed. We romped to 5-0 up with our first 5 shots on goal and took it pretty easy second half.
 
Reactions: skybluecam and Sky Blue Pete

Lamps

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 24, 2025
  • #994
shmmeee said:
I don’t think yesterday is an example of xG being wrong, our first dive shots on goal all went in. One was massively deflected, we hit an absolute screamer for one second half. Their keeper had a proper mare. It doesn’t take away from us, but in another game with and other keeper it could easily have been fewer goals and outside the goals we didn’t create lots of clear cut chances that we missed. We romped to 5-0 up with our first 5 shots on goal and took it pretty easy second half.
Click to expand...
xG rarely works when one of the sides has a GK the quality of Wilson or Collins.
 

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 25, 2025
  • #995
Mucca Mad Boys said:
Apparently Sakamoto had 0.7-0.8 xG over two chances v Hull, one chance being over 0.5 xG… I can’t recall 2 such chances.

It’s not an arbitrary measure, there’s clearly a mathematic formula behind it.
Click to expand...
It's a mathematical model but the inputs are essentially one systems viewpoint. I guess they use a feedback system to try and refine the model but like all models the parameters are what can be measured and there are things that can't be measured like for instance a player's state of mind and whether or not they're carrying a niggle.

Not only that there are different models out there so not all xG's are equal.

Also the idea of applying xG to one shot is like saying today's temperature reading is an indicator of future climate trends.

Expected goals: explained - Coaches' Voice

What are expected goals or xG, how are they calculated, and what does a player or team's xG tell us about how they are playing?
learning.coachesvoice.com

Anyway I'm like @Houchens Head I just want to see the game, I have no pretensions of being a football expert, I can state my PoV and people can take it or leave it.

Next game tomorrow innit.
 
Reactions: Joe King

Mercian In Anglia

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 25, 2025
  • #996
Just read that when they scored the consolation, QPR tweeted 'Kone Heads Home'.

Quickly deleted after someone replied 'don't blame him'.
 
Reactions: wingy, Sky Blue Pete, Lamps and 6 others
S

SeshMouseSkyBlue

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 25, 2025
  • #997
Brighton Sky Blue said:
I'm fine with Sheaf to deputise for Grimes, but alongside him they're too similar a profile and Sheaf is a less effective version.
Click to expand...
Torp can shoot on target too, unlike sheaf! Take Torp out and you’ve instantly lost a goal scoring threat
 
Reactions: fatso

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 25, 2025
  • #998
Captain Dart said:
It's a mathematical model but the inputs are essentially one systems viewpoint. I guess they use a feedback system to try and refine the model but like all models the parameters are what can be measured and there are things that can't be measured like for instance a player's state of mind and whether or not they're carrying a niggle.

Not only that there are different models out there so not all xG's are equal.

Also the idea of applying xG to one shot is like saying today's temperature reading is an indicator of future climate trends.

Expected goals: explained - Coaches' Voice

What are expected goals or xG, how are they calculated, and what does a player or team's xG tell us about how they are playing?
learning.coachesvoice.com

Anyway I'm like @Houchens Head I just want to see the game, I have no pretensions of being a football expert, I can state my PoV and people can take it or leave it.

Next game tomorrow innit.
Click to expand...

Im impressed even in an xG discussion you managed to get some random climate skeptic nonsense in there.

You may not believe in maths, but luckily for you the designers of your cars and airplanes do.
 

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 25, 2025
  • #999
shmmeee said:
Im impressed even in an xG discussion you managed to get some random climate skeptic nonsense in there.

You may not believe in maths, but luckily for you the designers of your cars and airplanes do.
Click to expand...
You are so easy to trigger.
 

Calista

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 25, 2025
  • #1,000
Houchens Head said:
It's been an amazing start!
Click to expand...
Care to put a percentage on that?
 
Reactions: TomRad85 and DazzleTommyDazzle

fatso

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 25, 2025
  • #1,001
SeshMouseSkyBlue said:
Torp can shoot on target too, unlike sheaf! Take Torp out and you’ve instantly lost a goal scoring threat
Click to expand...
Torp can also pass the ball forward.

Many is the time ive lost count of the number of sideways and backwards passes Sheaf has made.
Im not saying Sheaf isnt a good player, but there can be no doubt that we are more dynamic with the current 3 midfielders.

And as you pointed out, Sheaf cant shoot for shit.
 
Reactions: StrettoBoy, wingy and SeshMouseSkyBlue
S

SBbucks

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 25, 2025
  • #1,002
shmmeee said:
I think “everything we hit went in” is a pretty accurate story of the game tbh.
Click to expand...

Correct. There’s actually a very good explanation in The Athletic article yesterday - in short, it was a freak. It was the 3rd largest discrepancy out of over 18600 games across Europe where xG has been recorded. The top 2 were also 7 or 8 goal thrashings.
 
Reactions: skybluecam and Calista

Great_Expectations

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 25, 2025
  • #1,003
Cannot get ‘LA LA LA, LA LA LA LA LA’ out of my head.

My partner just asked me why I keep humming / randomly singing Kylie Minogue.

I did explain, even if she didn’t seem to care!
 
Reactions: CovRes

Joe King

Fairly well known member from Malvern
  • Aug 25, 2025
  • #1,004
Calista said:
Care to put a percentage on that?
Click to expand...
Easy. Up to now in league games, 77.78%
Next problem?
 
Reactions: Calista

skybluecam

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 25, 2025
  • #1,005
I'm a big believer in the usefulness of xg but it does feel like some of our chances were undervalued. BTA's goal was only valued at 0.27 despite being an uncontested shot from basically the penalty spot with only the keeper to beat.

QPR have also signed 3 half decent players since we beat them lol
 
Reactions: Mucca Mad Boys and Sky Blue Pete

TomRad85

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 25, 2025
  • #1,006
skybluecam said:
I'm a big believer in the usefulness of xg but it does feel like some of our chances were undervalued. BTA's goal was only valued at 0.27 despite being an uncontested shot from basically the penalty spot with only the keeper to beat.

QPR have also signed 3 half decent players since we beat them lol
Click to expand...
I find the stats interesting but at the same time find it all a bit American and I'm not sure a game or players can be evaluated as easily with stats as bland Yank sports. I guess when scouting it can help bring you to a target but you'll still want to watch with your eyes.
 
Reactions: MaltaSkyBlue and ovduk78

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 25, 2025
  • #1,007
TomRad85 said:
I find the stats interesting but at the same time find it all a bit American and I'm not sure a game or players can be evaluated as easily with stats as bland Yank sports. I guess when scouting it can help bring you to a target but you'll still want to watch with your eyes.
Click to expand...
The stats do tell the story of the game. Anyone watching on Saturday, it felt like we were going to score with every attack and we more or less did. Our final 3 of our goals were all low xG chances.

Even if our xG was double, or triple the figure of 1.27… it tells the story that we were efficient in front of goal. Most 7-1 results are anomalies to some degree.
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 25, 2025
  • #1,008
skybluecam said:
I'm a big believer in the usefulness of xg but it does feel like some of our chances were undervalued. BTA's goal was only valued at 0.27 despite being an uncontested shot from basically the penalty spot with only the keeper to beat.

QPR have also signed 3 half decent players since we beat them lol
Click to expand...
I have wondered how xG is compiled.

Is it done solely on the position of the shot because I can't see how they could get an accurate like for like comparison.

For example you could have a shot from say the penalty spot but be one on one with the keeper and the ball sitting perfectly for you and another from the same place but with three defenders in front of you and the ball bobbling and slightly behind you. How do they allow for those differences?

Also, what is it compared against? Is it just similar chances in your own league, or every league and if so how far does it go? A chance with a player at a higher level is probably more likely to be scored than at a lower level who have poorer technique. If it includes everyone teams higher up probably would have a lower xG than is accurate while poorer teams would have a higher one.

I think it can be useful but it has to also be flawed.
 
L

Legia Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 25, 2025
  • #1,009
skybluecam said:
I'm a big believer in the usefulness of xg but it does feel like some of our chances were undervalued. BTA's goal was only valued at 0.27 despite being an uncontested shot from basically the penalty spot with only the keeper to beat.

QPR have also signed 3 half decent players since we beat them lol
Click to expand...

Some bedwetters on here were quoting QPR as having done good business in the Summer before the season started, quoting them as an example of what we were missing out on and should be doing. Just because they've signed more players doesn't mean they will be any good!
 
Reactions: Gibbo
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
First Prev 29 of 29
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?