Show me a law that mentions “intentional”No their legs tangled. There was no intention. Hence no foul. FFS
The difference between murder and manslaughter?Show me a law that mentions “intentional”
There was a CET article with quotes from Lampard. Not sure how accurate but:Do we know if there's any updates on injuries? Am I getting a bit hopeful thinking we may see Bobby and EMC?
New or just the rehashed one from what he said pre-Luton?There was a CET article with quotes from Lampard. Not sure how accurate but:
Hopeful -
MvE
Thomas
Basette
Lati
Doubtful -
EMC
Monday, so not totally up to date but post Luton:New or just the rehashed one from what he said pre-Luton?
Wouldn't need much pace if Collins is in goal.If there was a coordinated and collective blowing air, would it reach the pitch? Just thinking if a Boro player shoots and everyone blows, would it take the pace off?
I'd sooner see Wright up front in place of the ineffective Simms and EMC or Pato on the left.EMC might have been missed & more than likely, is to continue on the treatment table for & beyond Saturdays game , but I can’t really remember a season , when we have so many options , on our left hand side ?
Paterson , whether starting or as a sub , knows where the net is & his experience in games like these is priceless.
Hadji , possibly his best position is the left , but certainly needs to do more than of late .
FACT.Club do not know what do with Collins or Simms.
Not that you can tell from that website which is borderline undecipherable but I'm pretty sure those were Lampard's comments at the weekend rather than anything new?Monday, so not totally up to date but post Luton:
NotVan Ewijk, Bassette, Thomas, Mason-Clark - Coventry City injury news
Coventry City injury news from CoventryLive as we take a look at the Sky Blues' injury list and when players are expected back as Frank Lampard prepares his players for Saturday's huge final game of the regular season against Middlesbroughwww.coventrytelegraph.net
i am by no means a physio or medical person, but at the JSB day last Wednesday, EMC could barely walk - i dont think we see him again on Saturday
15 fruit shootsPissed?
Show me a law that mentions “intentional”
- Careless is when a player shows a lack of attention or consideration when making a challenge or acts without precaution. No disciplinary sanction is needed
- Reckless is when a player acts with disregard to the danger to, or consequences for, an opponent and must be cautioned
- Using excessive force is when a player exceeds the necessary use of force and endangers the safety of an opponent and must be sent off
You conveniently missed two very important parts. “Trips or attempts to trip” and “in the consideration of the referee”The law says “careless, reckless, or using excessive force”. Which do you think applies here?
Here’s the exemplification:
You conveniently missed two very important parts. “Trips or attempts to trip” and “in the consideration of the referee”
It was a tough call to swallow and “in the consideration” of many referees it may have gone unpunished but by the literal letter of the law it was a correct decision.
I’m not misreading anything. In the consideration of the referee it was careless and a trip.No you’re misreading the rule as a whole. Here it is in full;
“A direct free kick is awarded if a player commits any of the following offences against an opponent in a manner considered by the referee to be careless, reckless or using excessive force:
If an offence involves contact it is penalised by a direct free kick or penalty kick.
- charges
- jumps at
- kicks or attempts to kick
- pushes
- strikes or attempts to strike (including head-butt)
- tackles or challenges
- trips or attempts to trip
A direct free kick is awarded if a player commits any of the following offences:
- Careless is when a player shows a lack of attention or consideration when making a challenge or acts without precaution. No disciplinary sanction is needed
- Reckless is when a player acts with disregard to the danger to, or consequences for, an opponent and must be cautioned
- Using excessive force is when a player exceeds the necessary use of force and endangers the safety of an opponent and must be sent off
See also offences in Law 3”
- a handball offence (except for the goalkeeper within their penalty area)
- holds an opponent
- impedes an opponent with contact
- bites or spits at someone on the team lists or a match official
- throws an object at the ball, opponent or match official, or makes contact with the ball with a held object
Any of those offences has to be carried out in a manner that is “careless, reckless, or using excessive force”. If that wasn’t the case then simply “tackles or challenges” would be a foul. One player tripping over another isn’t in and of itself a foul without carelessness recklessness or excessive force from the opponent.
You can definitely argue it's careless and he impedes an opponent with contact.No you’re misreading the rule as a whole. Here it is in full;
“A direct free kick is awarded if a player commits any of the following offences against an opponent in a manner considered by the referee to be careless, reckless or using excessive force:
If an offence involves contact it is penalised by a direct free kick or penalty kick.
- charges
- jumps at
- kicks or attempts to kick
- pushes
- strikes or attempts to strike (including head-butt)
- tackles or challenges
- trips or attempts to trip
A direct free kick is awarded if a player commits any of the following offences:
- Careless is when a player shows a lack of attention or consideration when making a challenge or acts without precaution. No disciplinary sanction is needed
- Reckless is when a player acts with disregard to the danger to, or consequences for, an opponent and must be cautioned
- Using excessive force is when a player exceeds the necessary use of force and endangers the safety of an opponent and must be sent off
See also offences in Law 3”
- a handball offence (except for the goalkeeper within their penalty area)
- holds an opponent
- impedes an opponent with contact
- bites or spits at someone on the team lists or a match official
- throws an object at the ball, opponent or match official, or makes contact with the ball with a held object
Any of those offences has to be carried out in a manner that is “careless, reckless, or using excessive force”. If that wasn’t the case then simply “tackles or challenges” would be a foul. One player tripping over another isn’t in and of itself a foul without carelessness recklessness or excessive force from the opponent.
Failing that get Frank to fly his big mate Diego Costa over to get him fired up.I think they need to win more than us so hopefully it means they leave massive spaces at the back.
The issue is, who is going to make the most of that and do a goal?
We have no other option than Simms up front, I just wish Lampard would get him in a room and call him a c**t, tell him the boro defender is going to knock him out, tell him the other defender is trying to follow his missus on insta and just get him to be aggressive and direct.
Failing that get Frank to fly his big mate Diego Costa over to get him fired up.
You can definitely argue it's careless and he impedes an opponent with contact.
Why are you arguing over Dasilvas red?
It's happened it's done
Why are you arguing over our posts?
FACT.
Can you define “tripping” & “Referee’s consideration” for those of us struggling to comprehend the laws according to Shmmeee?Impeding requires:
“Impeding the progress of an opponent means moving into the opponent’s path to obstruct, block, slow down or force a change of direction when the ball is not within playing distance of either player.”
Julien Dacosta perhapsIf he can get Costa over, he's starting!
Definitely need to tip the refereeCan you define “tripping” & “Referee’s consideration” for those of us struggling to comprehend the laws according to Shmmeee?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?