mmttww
Well-Known Member
If you wanna talk about something, do it. I've said how I see it. Posting rhetorical questions gets boring pretty quick.
Who knows more about the rules of the game?
If you wanna talk about something, do it. I've said how I see it. Posting rhetorical questions gets boring pretty quick.
Not possible.Boro and Coventry to claim playoffs. I have this good feeling. Coventry will claim 5th and boro 6th. Others will slip up.
Draw won’t be enough
Well that's the definition -
View attachment 42830
And what JDS did was careless, so don't see how it can't be a foul. In which case, red card for last man. If he wasn't being careless, he wouldn't have run straight across the back of his heels.
We posted it during the match , the lawIf you wanna talk about something, do it. I've said how I see it. Posting rhetorical questions gets boring pretty quick.
Boro and Coventry to claim playoffs. I have this good feeling. Coventry will claim 5th and boro 6th. Others will slip up.
We posted it during the match , the law
Hes missing out a couple of other parts to that actually section on purposeOK, ref. was wrong and Lampard is as well.
Dasilva doesn't have to get out his way and he hasn't changed his line to get in the bloke's way, either. He's entitled to take up physical space and, you know, run! If their player chooses to run close enough to Dasilva that he risks tripping himself over then he's a dumbass. I'll die on this hill. No one is convincing me that what Dasilva did is careless, reckless or using excessive force.
@Evo1883
I've read what you've posted and I don't think it's daft to agree with the ref, but I don't think there's an offence committed by Dasilva. That's the crux of it.
is it a foul yes or no ?
How can the bloke run too close to dasilva if hes the one setting the pace infront of dasilva ?I don't think Dasilva tripped him, I think the bloke ran too close to Dasilva, initiated the contact and tripped himself. I'm fine that you and others don't agree.
Dasilva is a poor defender, he got lucky when Bidwell's form plummeted and he got his place back. Same goes for Binks, he only got a look in when Thomas picked up a knock.Da Silva caught ball watching on the wrong side of his man it's not the first time that has happened this season how he hasn't learned by now is beyond me however he had upped his game over the last few weeks and the left back spot was his but the red has opened the door back for bidwell who has looked off the pace recently so it's bad timing as a whole
Sent from my SM-A528B using Tapatalk
Hes missing out a couple of other parts to that actually section on purpose
This is underneath that
View attachment 42835
i trip you up on the pitch wether I did it intentionally or not , is it a foul yes or no ?
Now factor in I'm through on goal
No. Are you saying every time a player falls over it’s a foul?
How can the bloke run too close to dasilva if hes the one setting the pace infront of dasilva ?
I'm done mate , cheersNo. Are you saying every time a player falls over it’s a foul?
I'm done mate , cheers
Are you drunk or just bored?
Solid debating skills. Rhetorical questions and insults instead of venturing an opinion of your own.
Ok last thing il say , watch the replay and tell me dasilva doesnt move across the back of the forward rather than the way you are making it outIf he chooses to run across Dasilva's path, that's on him. Dasilva doesn't have to get out of his way. I don't want to watch a game where that's a foul just because there's the faintest bit of contact. I don't have anything else to say about it so I'm gonna leave it there.
I wasn’t even replying to you. It’s hardly solid debating skills to flounce off and say you are done when shown to be wrong
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?