Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Coventry City ground share with Coventry RFC at Butts Park Arena could be back on (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter AFCCOVENTRY
  • Start date Sep 20, 2016
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
Next
First Prev 3 of 7 Next Last

oldskyblue58

CCFC Finance Director
  • Sep 21, 2016
  • #71
Just to give an indication on costs this old article from 2004 gives some information. Go to the Tables - regional stadium cost model.

http://www.building.co.uk/cost-model-football-stadiums/3036931.article

Have building costs increased since then? Will the BPA site present special problems for things like excavation costs etc?

I know they are saying start at 15000 capacity but if it is to be capable of expansion then a lot of the infra structure needs to be put in at the start to allow for the expansion. Also the fitting out is in addition to the 31m shown

How do they finance a build at BPA and how do the finance providers get their return?
 
Reactions: dongonzalos and skybluetony176

lewys33

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 21, 2016
  • #72
I don't see why everyone is against this? 15K stadium to start with and if it could go upwards then that would be fine. I have massive reservations about infrastructure but everyone seems to be moaning about the 15k bit ........
 
Reactions: Skyblueweeman and torchomatic

jimmyhillsfanclub

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 21, 2016
  • #73
oldskyblue58 said:
Just to give an indication on costs this old article from 2004 gives some information. Go to the Tables - regional stadium cost model.

Have building costs increased since then? Will the BPA site present special problems for things like excavation costs etc?

I know they are saying start at 15000 capacity but if it is to be capable of expansion then a lot of the infra structure needs to be put in at the start to allow for the expansion. Also the fitting out is in addition to the 31m shown

How do they finance a build at BPA and how do the finance providers get their return?
Click to expand...

Come on now OSB58.....play the game.....don't come on here & spoil it introducing the harsh reality of our clubs owners actually having to provide a coherent plan + hard cash......let us dream until lunch-time at least......
 
Reactions: oldskyblue58, skybluetony176 and montydon87

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 21, 2016
  • #74
Sky Blue Kid said:
I said months ago, if the ground was turned 90 degrees, and the main stand built back to the main road, a 25k ground would easily be converted.
Click to expand...
don't think that it would fit without going into the park, that would need council approval. Wonder how that would go?

Let's be honest, SISU are going to have to help fund this so it's not going to happen anyway.
 
B

Broken Hearted Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 21, 2016
  • #75
Nick said:
It is a story that he has agreed to sell it.

It is a long way away from a move being back on though which is how it is being spun.

There will be a lot more to this.
Click to expand...
Sharpe wanted a deal with city Millerchip didn't Millrechip is now selling to Sharpe. It says the deal could be back on which it could. Why is it spin the person who was against it is now going so it's proper to say the deal could be back on.
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Sep 21, 2016
  • #76
Broken Hearted Sky Blue said:
Sharpe wanted a deal with city Millerchip didn't Millrechip is now selling to Sharpe. It says the deal could be back on which it could. Why is it spin the person who was against it is now going so it's proper to say the deal could be back on.
Click to expand...

The news would be that there is an agreement to sell the lease... (it hasn't been done yet has it?)

The headline is completely about CCFC, so yes it is spinning it that way.

The fact he was picking up the phone to the Telegraph straight after doing talks about it also makes you wonder why...
 
S

Sky Blue Dal

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 21, 2016
  • #77
Headline:
Coventry City ground share with Coventry RFC at Butts Park Arena COULD be back on.
why does that word "COULD" not excite me. Hmm!!

Same ole same ole... CT mischief??
 

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 21, 2016
  • #78
lewys33 said:
I don't see why everyone is against this? 15K stadium to start with and if it could go upwards then that would be fine. I have massive reservations about infrastructure but everyone seems to be moaning about the 15k bit ........
Click to expand...

15K and bad infrastructure would be a temporary solution.

Moving the club back near the town would require a proper site to be found and imagination and active cooperation from the council.

I find the idea SISU have negotiated a deal to move to the Butts highly unlikely, in fact less likely than sightings of flying pigs.
 
Reactions: SkyBlueRuffian

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 21, 2016
  • #79
oldskyblue58 said:
Just to give an indication on costs this old article from 2004 gives some information. Go to the Tables - regional stadium cost model.

http://www.building.co.uk/cost-model-football-stadiums/3036931.article

Have building costs increased since then? Will the BPA site present special problems for things like excavation costs etc?

I know they are saying start at 15000 capacity but if it is to be capable of expansion then a lot of the infra structure needs to be put in at the start to allow for the expansion. Also the fitting out is in addition to the 31m shown

How do they finance a build at BPA and how do the finance providers get their return?
Click to expand...

I love the idea but can't see it happening, even if the money was there!
 

idm1975

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 21, 2016
  • #80
Nick said:
The news would be that there is an agreement to sell the lease... (it hasn't been done yet has it?)

The headline is completely about CCFC, so yes it is spinning it that way.

The fact he was picking up the phone to the Telegraph straight after doing talks about it also makes you wonder why...
Click to expand...
Do you not think it is more likely the telegraph phoned him for a comment?
 
O

oldfiver

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 21, 2016
  • #81
oldskyblue58 said:
still comes back to I will believe it when I see it, still not convinced anything suitable for both can be done on that site

One of the biggest problems I see for both CCFC & CRFC is the length of time it could take to get it done, neither club can afford long timescales and both could be gone before it starts....... let alone raising the £20m plus to pay for it (I would think that is the bare minimum required but I wouldn't be surprised at it being much more)

lot more twists and turns yet, will wait see but have no confidence of it ever happening
Click to expand...

Based on what? All we have is a CT article so far and, unless you have been told something by Jim the Gateman you are no wiser than the next.
 

lewys33

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 21, 2016
  • #82
Captain Dart said:
15K and bad infrastructure would be a temporary solution.

Moving the club back near the town would require a proper site to be found and imagination and active cooperation from the council.

I find the idea SISU have negotiated a deal to move to the Butts highly unlikely, in fact less likely than sightings of flying pigs.
Click to expand...

My actual opinion differs slightly. I think they would be close to a deal. A temporary deal yes - I think they will negotiate a temporary deal with CRFC in order to distress Wasps and still get the ricoh cheap.
 
F

Frankley

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 21, 2016
  • #83
clint van damme said:
don't think that it would fit without going into the park, that would need council approval. Wonder how that would go?

Let's be honest, SISU are going to have to help fund this so it's not going to happen anyway.
Click to expand...

I think you're right, there wouldn't be enough room for a main stand backing onto the main road. That's not to say there isn't enough room to build a stadium on that site though.

The site is larger than the Union Berlin Stadium site (German second division) and that has a 22,000 capacity. Just for fun, I've dropped the Union Berlin Stadium onto the Butts site, it fits if the administration offices are relocated.




Of course, loads of money would be needed to build a stadium like that.
 
Reactions: Rodders1 and Earlsdon_Skyblue1
O

OffenhamSkyBlue

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 21, 2016
  • #84
When this was first mooted a few months back, didn't it come out that the Council had included a clause in the lease or a covenant on the deeds which prohibited any use by a professional football club?
I love the idea, but I am still deeply suspicious of the Council's desire to support the Ricoh no matter what the damage to CCFC.
 

lewys33

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 21, 2016
  • #85
Frankley said:
I think you're right, there wouldn't be enough room for a main stand backing onto the main road. That's not to say there isn't enough room to build a stadium on that site though.

The site is larger than the Union Berlin Stadium site (German second division) and that has a 22,000 capacity. Just for fun, I've dropped the Union Berlin Stadium onto the Butts site, it fits if the administration offices are relocated.

View attachment 5662


Of course, loads of money would be needed to build a stadium like that.
Click to expand...

who needs an architect
 
Reactions: Skyblueweeman and Frankley

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 21, 2016
  • #86
lewys33 said:
who needs an architect
Click to expand...

Right then, we've got Frankley's picture so it's just a builder we need now. Anybody in the building game?
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 21, 2016
  • #87
The Union Berlin one looks great tbh:

 
Reactions: Skyblueweeman, Earlsdon_Skyblue1, stupot07 and 2 others
S

Sky Blue Dal

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 21, 2016
  • #88
There a train line too .. how would that not get affected in any future expansion?
 
F

Frankley

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 21, 2016
  • #89
lewys33 said:
who needs an architect
Click to expand...

Anyone wanting to develop The Butts would - I did say it was a bit of fun.

Imagine what a decent architect might come up with though, under pitch parking and a tight pitch surrounded by steeply banked stands.

The problem is it will all cost too much.
 
Reactions: lewys33

letsallsingtogether

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 21, 2016
  • #90
fernandopartridge said:
Right then, we've got Frankley's picture so it's just a builder we need now. Anybody in the building game?
Click to expand...
Bob could do it
 
Reactions: Brylowes and fernandopartridge

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 21, 2016
  • #91
would we own the ground? part own? or just rental?

could be good news though

for selfish reasons i would miss ricoh but needs must
 
F

Frankley

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 21, 2016
  • #92
Sky Blue Dal said:
There a train line too .. how would that not get affected in any future expansion?
Click to expand...

If someone was developing the site they could avoid the mainline and use the existing (unused) siding for a rapid transit system to ferry fans to the railway station... monorail anyone :hilarious:
 
F

Frankley

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 21, 2016
  • #93
letsallsingtogether said:
Bob could do it
Click to expand...

Let's go with 'fan action' and build it with lego
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Sep 21, 2016
  • #94
Could they not build a tunnel into the stadium so the train effectively goes through it? That would be good.

Expensive, but good!
 

ajsccfc

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 21, 2016
  • #95
Monorail! Monorail! Monorail! Monorail!

Is there a chance the track could bend?

 
Reactions: Skyblueweeman, Otis, skybluetony176 and 4 others

hill83

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 21, 2016
  • #96
We could always stick the away end out of the way a bit to save space

 
Reactions: Skyblueweeman, Otis, Earlsdon_Skyblue1 and 9 others

Johnnythespider

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 21, 2016
  • #97
fernandopartridge said:
The Union Berlin one looks great tbh:

Click to expand...
Now that is a football ground
Can we name one of the stands behind the goal "The west end"

Sent from my SM-G925F using Tapatalk
 
Reactions: OffenhamSkyBlue and Nick

lewys33

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 21, 2016
  • #98
It's worth noting though that looking at pics it seems their ground has a lot of standing areas which would increase the capacity.
 
Reactions: martcov
M

martcov

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 21, 2016
  • #99
Frankley said:
I think you're right, there wouldn't be enough room for a main stand backing onto the main road. That's not to say there isn't enough room to build a stadium on that site though.

The site is larger than the Union Berlin Stadium site (German second division) and that has a 22,000 capacity. Just for fun, I've dropped the Union Berlin Stadium onto the Butts site, it fits if the administration offices are relocated.

View attachment 5662


Of course, loads of money would be needed to build a stadium like that.
Click to expand...

Does the 22000 in Union Berlin include standing?
 
M

martcov

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 21, 2016
  • #100
lewys33 said:
It's worth noting though that looking at pics it seems their ground has a lot of standing areas which would increase the capacity.
Click to expand...

Answered my question as I was asking it..
 

oldskyblue58

CCFC Finance Director
  • Sep 21, 2016
  • #101
covcity4life said:
would we own the ground? part own? or just rental?

could be good news though

for selfish reasons i would miss ricoh but needs must
Click to expand...

as I understand it the thinking is that CCFC would be tenant taking all football related incomes, and having access/ability to putting on its own events etc on the BPA site
 

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 21, 2016
  • #102
oldskyblue58 said:
as I understand it the thinking is that CCFC would be tenant taking all football related incomes, and having access/ability to putting on its own events etc on the BPA site
Click to expand...

sounds good

either way lets get council stooges like millerchip out the way
 
M

martcov

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 21, 2016
  • #103
If I remember rightly, the Union Berlin Fans helped build some of the stadium......
 
O

OffenhamSkyBlue

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 21, 2016
  • #104
Especially the walls?
 
Reactions: SkyBlueRuffian, rondog1973, chiefdave and 1 other person
F

Frankley

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 21, 2016
  • #105
martcov said:
Answered my question as I was asking it..
Click to expand...

There is standing and that does boost the capacity.

I think Celtic are running a trial of railed seating (which is a way of operating safe standing that they have in Germany). Standing is already allowed in the third flight and if the Celtic trial is successful it may be that some standing may be allowed in the top two divisions.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
Next
First Prev 3 of 7 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?