D
Ddccfc
Guest
What exactly did we "do"? Access publicly available information on the Internet and publish it on a forum.
Gosh. Who would do such a thing?!
Proud of yourself are you?....I've had rows with Grenduffy, Torchomatic, to name but two, but even they wouldn't stoop to what you and Summerisle did.
Scum doesn't come close!
The forum is full of wankers, but you Ddccfc and Summerisle top the lot. Every poster has the right to anonimity and FLB is entitled to his. What the fuck are your names?
I cannot take offence to being called a liar. You do not know who I am. On this board I am anonymous. Therefore your allegation cannot be levelled at anyone in particular or, more accurately, me specifically.
Being anonymous affords me the privilege of not being open to the same level of direct criticism and scrutiny that any public figure / body is. I'm faceless and so any personal risk is eliminated, allowing me to make sweeping statements at will.
Beginning to understand yet sweetie? Or do you need me to speak more slowlyyyyyy?
I believe I pointed out an obvious error in my very first post in this thread.
The thread with the misleading title. Started by...
Proud of yourself are you?....I've had rows with Grenduffy, Torchomatic, to name but two, but even they wouldn't stoop to what you and Summerisle did.
Scum doesn't come close!
Proud of yourself are you?....I've had rows with Grenduffy, Torchomatic, to name but two, but even they wouldn't stoop to what you and Summerisle did.
Scum doesn't come close!
There's only one c**t around here, and your one of them:jerkit:
Only one and I'm one of them?
I was acutely aware you had no formal legal qualifications.
Indeed, I had no such information about your links with ACL / Guilfoyle.
However, this conversation has served its purpose and perfectly sums up the dangerous misdirection ill informed statements under the guise of anonymity can create.
It will now be extremely difficult for either side to discredit you when you produce well researched, balanced blogs. Keep up the "good" work.
So then, you admit that what you accused FLB of was in fact a complete and utter lie.
Best to file your posts under dangerous misdirection, not ill-informed admittedly, just flat out bullshit under the guise of anonymity.
Wasn't too hard to discredit you, was it. Pathetic.
I have it on good authority that the author of the blog has links with Mr Guilfoyle / ACL.
Indeed, I had no such information about your links with ACL / Guilfoyle.
Does it not show something about you having rows with everyone? To be fair if the guy didn't want his name known, would he have posted it on his website?
Joy seppala doesn't want to be in the public eye but I bet if you had a picture of her you would out her?
WTF is wrong with you Nick? Don't you respect someones right to anonimity.
Just because I've had rows with posters doesn't mean I started the row.l think you need to get your house in order before making assumptions
Don't give me the bollox about FLB and his web site. He deserves the right of anonimity on this forum.
If this sort of thing is going to be the "Norm" then you can shove your forum up your arse.
WTF is wrong with you Nick? Don't you respect someones right to anonimity.
Just because I've had rows with posters doesn't mean I started the row.l think you need to get your house in order before making assumptions
Don't give me the bollox about FLB and his web site. He deserves the right of anonimity on this forum.
If this sort of thing is going to be the "Norm" then you can shove your forum up your arse.
Anyone else immediately thought of 'Cheers' as soon as they read that out to themselves?
Anyone else immediately thought of 'Cheers' as soon as they read that out to themselves?
Isn't it stange how I pointed that out to Fisher and Brookfield at one of the forums and they denied it.
Did the bidders know what they were bidding for at the time ?
Seems pretty essential to me.
Were the others told the players were in Holdings when SISU knew they were in LTD !!!
I was acutely aware you had no formal legal qualifications.
Indeed, I had no such information about your links with ACL / Guilfoyle.
However, this conversation has served its purpose and perfectly sums up the dangerous misdirection ill informed statements under the guise of anonymity can create.
It will now be extremely difficult for either side to discredit you when you produce well researched, balanced blogs. Keep up the "good" work.
Indeed.
He'll probably just come back with a new username though rather than man up and apologise.
http://www.skybluestalk.co.uk/threads/30905-Two-clubs-one-share?p=439929#post439929Its a little odd as I checked his History on here after yesterday and there's a thread he started on the same subject matter ,covering pretty much Identical ground ,same questions raised and attempts at answering . So I'm curious as to why his perspective has changed??:thinking about:
Indeed.
He'll probably just come back with a new username though rather than man up and apologise.
If you think I need to apologise, you really have missed the point.
If you think I need to apologise, you really have missed the point.
I have it on good authority that the author of the blog has links with Mr Guilfoyle / ACL.
Indeed, I had no such information about your links with ACL / Guilfoyle.
This made me laugh, first time I have seen short man syndrome on a web forum! what a tit ha haI cannot take offence to being called a liar. You do not know who I am. On this board I am anonymous. Therefore your allegation cannot be levelled at anyone in particular or, more accurately, me specifically.
Being anonymous affords me the privilege of not being open to the same level of direct criticism and scrutiny that any public figure / body is. I'm faceless and so any personal risk is eliminated, allowing me to make sweeping statements at will.
Beginning to understand yet sweetie? Or do you need me to speak more slowlyyyyyy?
I just think it's a case of people have simply focusing on the very bold and clear statement of 'knowing something on good authority'
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?