Biggest disappointment for me was when it was revealed in court that the CT did a deal with CCC to suppress information relating to the Ricoh sale. There had been people on here suggesting the CT and CCC were pretty cosy on here and Simon would categorically deny it and suggest it was tin foil hat territory. Once that came out in court he never posted on here again and the CT never addressed the issue at all.
Hi.
Nothing of that nature was ever "revealed in court".
The Wasps deal was actually revealed by the CT weeks before it was concluded - much to the annoyance of the council and Wasps. The implication it was somehow covered up by the paper is the polar opposite of what happened.
It's denied because it is tin foil hat territory.
I stopped posting because of nonsense like this - and the rest of this thread.
Of course it is.What all of it?
I have not posted nonsesce, I have also asked for no ccfc. ccc, etc to be posted. If you want to post and make a point please do, I have removed other points of view (for now)Hi.
Nothing of that nature was ever "revealed in court".
The Wasps deal was actually revealed by the CT weeks before it was concluded - much to the annoyance of the council and Wasps. The implication it was somehow covered up by the paper is the polar opposite of what happened.
It's denied because it is tin foil hat territory.
I stopped posting because of nonsense like this - and the rest of this thread.
What all of it?
Hi.
Nothing of that nature was ever "revealed in court".
The Wasps deal was actually revealed by the CT weeks before it was concluded - much to the annoyance of the council and Wasps. The implication it was somehow covered up by the paper is the polar opposite of what happened.
It's denied because it is tin foil hat territory.
why does the sun say goodbye, it ended when I sad goodbye.
I stopped posting because of nonsense like this - and the rest of this thread.
Reading this you'd think running a newspaper/news website that didn't agree with the posters views & prejudices and published articles aimed at encouraging readership was some sort of crime.
I think he meant the bail out.Hi.
Nothing of that nature was ever "revealed in court".
The Wasps deal was actually revealed by the CT weeks before it was concluded - much to the annoyance of the council and Wasps. The implication it was somehow covered up by the paper is the polar opposite of what happened.
It's denied because it is tin foil hat territory.
I stopped posting because of nonsense like this - and the rest of this thread.
Hi.
Nothing of that nature was ever "revealed in court".
The Wasps deal was actually revealed by the CT weeks before it was concluded - much to the annoyance of the council and Wasps. The implication it was somehow covered up by the paper is the polar opposite of what happened.
It's denied because it is tin foil hat territory.
I stopped posting because of nonsense like this - and the rest of this thread.
The other thing to bear in mind in fairness to the CT is that not many people care about Wasps season ticketsPerhaps they can write about the Wasps season tickets being delayed. That will get people angry.
Actually, because it's not SISU or CCFC probably not...
Sent from my E5823 using Tapatalk
Your paper suppressed the story about the ACL bail out. So don't come here on your high horse.Hi.
Nothing of that nature was ever "revealed in court".
The Wasps deal was actually revealed by the CT weeks before it was concluded - much to the annoyance of the council and Wasps. The implication it was somehow covered up by the paper is the polar opposite of what happened.
It's denied because it is tin foil hat territory.
I stopped posting because of nonsense like this - and the rest of this thread.
Your paper suppressed the story about the ACL bail out. So don't come here on your high horse.
Sounds like you're agreeing with Fiona Lawrence, SISU lawyer, that Simon Goacher, engaged by CCC, had not investigated the claim fully and had not followed up on all the evidence he was supplied with?Nothing of that nature was ever "revealed in court".
Some journalists are crap - and you can use them. You can tell they’re crap when they take the first quote you give them, they use the angle on your press release and they don’t chase you on supplementary questions. If they’ve got a decent newsdesk they’ll be back with more questions after you’ve fobbed them off the first time, but time and resources being what they are on local newspapers you can usually expect an easy ride
So rather than defend yourself on a forum that you cleary read you prefer to let people question your journalistic integrity without response?I stopped posting because of nonsense like this - and the rest of this thread.
If Simon is going to pass comment on the validity of postings on the internet might be wise to start a little closer to home with the Telegraph's comment section.Surely could just reply to the points rather than claiming conspiracy all the time?
I think he meant the bail out.
Why is the rest of the thread nonsense?
Surely could just reply to the points rather than claiming conspiracy all the time?
It's nice and easy to discredit posters on here, meanwhile you play up to people like garry woolaston.
It's easier to just keep shouting conspiracy if people disagree or challenge anything, no matter how constructive it is.Can't say a word bad about the Telegraph on here or you're part of the "tin foil hat brigade"
The Telegraph are the last noble bastions for justice in this fair city, didn't you know that they single-handedly brought the club home from Northampton? Personally, I can't understand why there isn't a statue of the great Simon Gilbert stood next to Jimmy Hill outside the Ricoh. Thank you for saving CCFC, Coventry Telegraph!
Hopefully by now is time to act he means the CT are going to get round to do something.
It's easier to just keep shouting conspiracy if people disagree or challenge anything, no matter how constructive it is.
The same as the old prnoid stuff
And if they haven't come back to him isn't that a story itself? The CT seem to have a hotline straight through to CCC, CSF and Wasps, on some stories they have a response up from them in minutes so if they are refusing to engage with the paper on this topic doesn't that raise its own questions?Simon said he had written to wasps and RFU over 2 weeks ago.
No story yet so assumed they haven't got back to him, only wasps coming back to the table re: Ricoh negotiations will prevent moving out of coventry, yet he and CT are targeting sisu, ccfc, FL and Fa.
I've now asked him about it 5 times in the last 2 weeks, but he just ignores me.And if they haven't come back to him isn't that a story itself? The CT seem to have a hotline straight through to CCC, CSF and Wasps, on some stories they have a response up from them in minutes so if they are refusing to engage with the paper on this topic doesn't that raise its own questions?
Hopefully by now is time to act he means the CT are going to get round to do something.
Where has stu or anybody said otherwise? He's asking the CT about the balance of their reporting.I never realised that the CT are responsible for the day to day running of CCFC. You live you learn.
Nobody said they were. Think back to when we were in Northampton, the CT did absolutely nothing for 12 months and then after a couple of weeks campaigning we suddenly came back, if you were suspicious you would think it was all planned. Anyway thats not the point the point is the CT and in particular Simon Gilbert were more than happy to take all the credit for that yet now they are sat on the arses doing nothing again they are saying its down to the fans.I never realised that the CT are responsible for the day to day running of CCFC. You live you learn.
You what!!! A local newspapers iob is to report the local NEWS, NOT MAKE IT UP.Not often I could consider supporting the CET, but surely a newspapers role is to REPORT, not provide leadership to a supporters group campaign.
The supporters group should be doing the campaigning...the donkey work, the research, the fundraising etc.
Sitting on hands whingeing that someone else should do it smacks of hypocrisy in the extreme.
Sent from my SGP611 using Tapatalk
If you read the thread you would now that it's not antiCov Tel, Just the shit they print.Not often I could consider supporting the CET, but surely a newspapers role is to REPORT, not provide leadership to a supporters group campaign.
The supporters group should be doing the campaigning...the donkey work, the research, the fundraising etc.
Sitting on hands whingeing that someone else should do it smacks of hypocrisy in the extreme.
Sent from my SGP611 using Tapatalk
If you read the thread you would now that it's not antiCov Tel, Just the shit they print.
I ripped the article apart, that's what it desserved. Cov Tel, Report and print facts, we all want them (we might not like them but hey) facts are facts. Can CCFC survive. Cov Tel. GIVE US YOUR OPIION!!!!
Living abroad, the fist thing I do is buy a Cov Tel. 5 mins down the road I wonder why I brought it, but I do through habbit.
Not often I could consider supporting the CET, but surely a newspapers role is to REPORT, not provide leadership to a supporters group campaign.
The supporters group should be doing the campaigning...the donkey work, the research, the fundraising etc.
Sitting on hands whingeing that someone else should do it smacks of hypocrisy in the extreme.
Sent from my SGP611 using Tapatalk
When things are bad, what does that mean?
Do you mean... like for BHS employees robbed of pensions? For youth unemployment? Council service cuts? The homeless? Or siding with a trading company against another trading company... and against a charity...and a leisure centre management company?
I'm not a fan of the CET, far from it. But please, be REAL.
Sent from my SGP611 using Tapatalk
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?