Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • General Discussion
  • Off Topic Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Cov city centre (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter the rumpo kid
  • Start date Jul 11, 2023
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
Next
First Prev 14 of 15 Next Last
C

CovValleyBoy

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 24, 2025
  • #456
Yeah & they are all in the UK I fear.
 

pusbccfc

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 24, 2025
  • #457
Gynnsthetonic said:
For a city this size, not many if any in the UK
Click to expand...

Wolverhampton, Luton, Bradford, Stoke, Sunderland are just a few that are worse.
 
C

CovValleyBoy

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 24, 2025
  • #458
pusbccfc said:
Wolverhampton, Luton, Bradford, Stoke, Sunderland are just a few that are worse.
Click to expand...
It's a low bar isn't it ?
 

pusbccfc

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 24, 2025
  • #459
CovValleyBoy said:
Yeah & they are all in the UK I fear.
Click to expand...

Not true though. There are quiet/rough/depressing places in most countries.

America is full of horrible cities far worse than Coventry. Plenty of poor cities in Germany, Spain, Greece and France. We just don't visit them and associate them with all the lovely parts.
 

pusbccfc

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 24, 2025
  • #460
CovValleyBoy said:
It's a low bar isn't it ?
Click to expand...

They are comparable in population. Majority of middle-sized cities in the UK are similar to Coventry.

The places which are significantly better are either the major tourist/economic cities like Leeds, Liverpool and Manchester or they are the smaller tourist hubs like Oxford, York, and Cambridge.

I've travelled to many places in England, partly through work and partly through football and everywhere I go people hammer their own cities like folk in Coventry do.
 

mmttww

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 24, 2025
  • #461
I'm just glad people realised most of it needed tearing down and got on with it. Hope it makes the difference it needs to.
 

Tommo1993

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 24, 2025
  • #462
Be done with the IKEA building and bring back the dingy Co-op.
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 24, 2025
  • #463
Gynnsthetonic said:
The whole City Centre is a mess, it's too big too spread out and not enough roads. Nobody likes eating and drinking on concrete precinct and walkways. Traffic and roads adds vibrancy
Click to expand...
Our city centre is really small compared to most cities our size. The problem is nothing is connected together, or provides a decent, worthwhile route to get between them.

The biggest problem is the RR, as it cuts off the connection between the surrounding suburbs so no-one just 'wanders' into town anymore. The biggest 'miss' of the last 25-30 years was the failure to pass the Swanswell Initiative levelling J1-3 of the RR.

A lot of the redevelopment post-war onwards has been a mess. The Gibson plan made everything disjointed and back-to-front. Rather than putting public squares at 'nodes' at interesting features or where many places intersect he just tried to force them in places where he wanted them even though they made no sense. Why the precinct needed to be precisely east-west when you could have built it following Smithfield St so it was a route that led somewhere I don't know.

The Phoenix Initiative is inside out. Supposed to connect the transport musuem to the cathedral, but doesn't offer a sightline or clear route between the two so you ignore it. The route looks more like an alley leading to service areas.

Talking of that I've got no idea what they think they'll achieve with the area off Hales St where the river runs. Again it will seem like a service area hidden behind tall buildings. I can't see anyone wanting to go there.

The one bit that has been a slight improvement is the route from the train station into the city centre, although overall I think it's a failure because it was never going to need that much office space.

It's so annoying that it doesn't seem to me to be that difficult to see potential routes between sites of interest, or sightlines to appreciate them and then the nodes that are formed between them from that. Yet somehow everytime the planners do almost the exact opposite.

For example I've long said that you could get a brilliant sightline/route from the train station into the city centre that incorporates a view of the three spires. The perspective is ideal. It would lead people towards the city centre and create a unique sense of place. You know you're in Coventry. But guess where was the one place the council decided tall buildings could be built in the city centre? Exactly on that route. Instead they decided to preserve 'sightlines' of the spires that are largely covered with modern structures and even cut off by the RR.
 
Reactions: LastGarrison, Sick Boy, Gynnsthetonic and 1 other person

pusbccfc

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 24, 2025
  • #464
Sky_Blue_Dreamer said:
Our city centre is really small compared to most cities our size. The problem is nothing is connected together, or provides a decent, worthwhile route to get between them.

The biggest problem is the RR, as it cuts off the connection between the surrounding suburbs so no-one just 'wanders' into town anymore. The biggest 'miss' of the last 25-30 years was the failure to pass the Swanswell Initiative levelling J1-3 of the RR.

A lot of the redevelopment post-war onwards has been a mess. The Gibson plan made everything disjointed and back-to-front. Rather than putting public squares at 'nodes' at interesting features or where many places intersect he just tried to force them in places where he wanted them even though they made no sense. Why the precinct needed to be precisely east-west when you could have built it following Smithfield St so it was a route that led somewhere I don't know.

The Phoenix Initiative is inside out. Supposed to connect the transport musuem to the cathedral, but doesn't offer a sightline or clear route between the two so you ignore it. The route looks more like an alley leading to service areas.

Talking of that I've got no idea what they think they'll achieve with the area off Hales St where the river runs. Again it will seem like a service area hidden behind tall buildings. I can't see anyone wanting to go there.

The one bit that has been a slight improvement is the route from the train station into the city centre, although overall I think it's a failure because it was never going to need that much office space.

It's so annoying that it doesn't seem to me to be that difficult to see potential routes between sites of interest, or sightlines to appreciate them and then the nodes that are formed between them from that. Yet somehow everytime the planners do almost the exact opposite.

For example I've long said that you could get a brilliant sightline/route from the train station into the city centre that incorporates a view of the three spires. The perspective is ideal. It would lead people towards the city centre and create a unique sense of place. You know you're in Coventry. But guess where was the one place the council decided tall buildings could be built in the city centre? Exactly on that route. Instead they decided to preserve 'sightlines' of the spires that are largely covered with modern structures and even cut off by the RR.
Click to expand...

Lots of good points although I disagree slightly with Friargate. I think the area looks really good despite not fully being finished.

For me, that area should be full of residential apartments etc. It is next to a train station which can get you into London quicker than some Surrey and Kent commuter towns.
 
Reactions: Captain Dart and Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 24, 2025
  • #465
pusbccfc said:
Lots of good points although I disagree slightly with Friargate. I think the area looks really good despite not fully being finished.

For me, that area should be full of residential apartments etc. It is next to a train station which can get you into London quicker than some Surrey and Kent commuter towns.
Click to expand...
I agree entirely and the big problem is it's not finished. The new hotel looks so weird and small considering it was supposed to be the showcase route and make the city seem more built up.

Until it is it'll be a failure. And I foresee that being with a lot of residential apartments.
 

pusbccfc

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 24, 2025
  • #466
Sky_Blue_Dreamer said:
I agree entirely and the big problem is it's not finished. The new hotel looks so weird and small considering it was supposed to be the showcase route and make the city seem more built up.

Until it is it'll be a failure. And I foresee that being with a lot of residential apartments.
Click to expand...

They should have gone taller with the hotel but I still think it looks pretty good. The whole area is relatively clean and modern. Far better than what was before!

Coventry City Centre needs more residents. If people live in town, they will eat, shop and socialise there. That's why it's pretty quiet after 6pm.
 
Reactions: Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 24, 2025
  • #467
pusbccfc said:
They should have gone taller with the hotel but I still think it looks pretty good. The whole area is relatively clean and modern. Far better than what was before!

Coventry City Centre needs more residents. If people live in town, they will eat, shop and socialise there. That's why it's pretty quiet after 6pm.
Click to expand...
One thing I will say I don't like about Friargate are the streetlights. I know they're meant to look modern and interesting but it just looks like someone's crashed into them.

If we were going to go bespoke could we not have done a design that was more obviously linked to Coventry?
 
Reactions: pusbccfc

mmttww

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 24, 2025
  • #468
Sky_Blue_Dreamer said:
nothing is connected together, or provides a decent, worthwhile route to get between them..
Click to expand...

Exactly this, even within the RR it's the biggest issue.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 24, 2025
  • #469
Nick said:

Part of Coventry's old IKEA building could be demolished under new plans

A new planning application has emerged after a new contractor was appointed on the project to turn the former homeware store into a cultural hub
www.coventrytelegraph.net

Seems weird to knock the whole multi storey down.
Click to expand...
Wondered what this was all about until I got to this line
Space for Future Commercial/Retail tenants will now be created at ground floor.
Click to expand...
Although why they think there is a need for that when half the city centre and pretty much the entire SkyDome is empty is anyones guess.

This has all the signs of slowly morphing from something for the benefit of the public into another council disaster.
 
Reactions: Captain Dart

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 24, 2025
  • #470
chiefdave said:
Wondered what this was all about until I got to this line

Although why they think there is a need for that when half the city centre and pretty much the entire SkyDome is empty is anyones guess.

This has all the signs of slowly morphing from something for the benefit of the public into another council disaster.
Click to expand...
I guess it's to do with making a business case for it. And we have had far too many streets where the street level has no frontages. That part of Corp St for example has a wall for IKEA on one side and a car park on the other. Hardly a great streetscape.

Whether of course it'll be a success is of course very debatable, but I guess it's better than a blank wall.
 

andy86

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 24, 2025
  • #471
Sky_Blue_Dreamer said:
Our city centre is really small compared to most cities our size. The problem is nothing is connected together, or provides a decent, worthwhile route to get between them.

The biggest problem is the RR, as it cuts off the connection between the surrounding suburbs so no-one just 'wanders' into town anymore. The biggest 'miss' of the last 25-30 years was the failure to pass the Swanswell Initiative levelling J1-3 of the RR.

A lot of the redevelopment post-war onwards has been a mess. The Gibson plan made everything disjointed and back-to-front. Rather than putting public squares at 'nodes' at interesting features or where many places intersect he just tried to force them in places where he wanted them even though they made no sense. Why the precinct needed to be precisely east-west when you could have built it following Smithfield St so it was a route that led somewhere I don't know.

The Phoenix Initiative is inside out. Supposed to connect the transport musuem to the cathedral, but doesn't offer a sightline or clear route between the two so you ignore it. The route looks more like an alley leading to service areas.

Talking of that I've got no idea what they think they'll achieve with the area off Hales St where the river runs. Again it will seem like a service area hidden behind tall buildings. I can't see anyone wanting to go there.

The one bit that has been a slight improvement is the route from the train station into the city centre, although overall I think it's a failure because it was never going to need that much office space.

It's so annoying that it doesn't seem to me to be that difficult to see potential routes between sites of interest, or sightlines to appreciate them and then the nodes that are formed between them from that. Yet somehow everytime the planners do almost the exact opposite.

For example I've long said that you could get a brilliant sightline/route from the train station into the city centre that incorporates a view of the three spires. The perspective is ideal. It would lead people towards the city centre and create a unique sense of place. You know you're in Coventry. But guess where was the one place the council decided tall buildings could be built in the city centre? Exactly on that route. Instead they decided to preserve 'sightlines' of the spires that are largely covered with modern structures and even cut off by the RR.
Click to expand...
Great post.

The mistakes made when regenerating Coventry is a very long list unfortunately.

Like the 90’s trend of opening out of town retail parks all over the city (including central 6), then wondering why no one shops in the city centre anymore.
 
Last edited: Sep 24, 2025
Reactions: Captain Dart, Sick Boy, Gynnsthetonic and 1 other person

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 24, 2025
  • #472
The only city I've been to, of a similar size to Coventry, and thought it was much nicer, was Bristol. Really vibrant parts of the city, nice buildings, lots going on.

Outside of that, Edinburgh's probably the nicest city in the country overall.
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 24, 2025
  • #473
andy86 said:
Great post.

The mistakes made when regenerating Coventry is a very long list unfortunately.

Like the 90’s trend of opening out of town retail parks all over the city (including central 6), then wondering why no one shops in the city centre anymore.
Click to expand...
The retail and business parks I can sort of understand at the time.

We had a number of large industrial sites that lay empty and a real need to increase the number of job opportunities in the city after the closure of a number of large employers, especially in the motor industry. The country was moving to a service economy and it felt there was a market for larger retail units with parking etc. to provide jobs. I guess they must have had some success for a while given how many popped up over the years - if there wasn't demand then we wouldn't have got so many.

There have been errors made within that of course. For example having IKEA, a retailer renowned for needing large, easily accessible units for the furniture was inexplicably shoehorned into a multi-storey city centre site when they clearly better suited an out of town site with good transport links as you're going to visit with a car. You're not taking a wardrobe, even a flat pack one, home on the bus! And so we became the first IKEA failure.

I think the situation has changed quite a bit since the 90's though. There has been a big move to online shopping and WFH. A number of these sites have empty units and some of the business parks (like Westwood) are empty as the offices are no longer up to the standard required.

As we have a huge supply deficit of housing I think it would make a lot of sense for a lot of these out of town retail parks to be turned over for residential, although that would involve the problems of changing the land designation to residential and what costs would be involved to make the sites suitable. The businesses could relocate more centrally as we have plenty of empty retail and office space, although again does it fit the needs of modern day businesses?
 
Last edited: Sep 24, 2025
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 24, 2025
  • #474
Just use it for modern need and use it for prefab houses?
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 27, 2025
  • #475
Does our council ever manage to not fuck something up? Remember at the time there was talk that the numbers used to justify closing the sports centre and opening this place did not stack up.

Huge shortfall in visitors to Coventry City Council's The Wave water park

The Wave in Coventry is getting about a million fewer visits annually than predicted, the BBC finds.
www.bbc.co.uk
 
Reactions: Captain Dart, AOM, nicksar and 1 other person

hill83

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 27, 2025
  • #476
chiefdave said:
Does our council ever manage to not fuck something up? Remember at the time there was talk that the numbers used to justify closing the sports centre and opening this place did not stack up.

Huge shortfall in visitors to Coventry City Council's The Wave water park

The Wave in Coventry is getting about a million fewer visits annually than predicted, the BBC finds.
www.bbc.co.uk
Click to expand...

It’s way too expensive
 
Reactions: Bertola and nicksar

nicksar

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 27, 2025
  • #477
chiefdave said:
Does our council ever manage to not fuck something up? Remember at the time there was talk that the numbers used to justify closing the sports centre and opening this place did not stack up.

Huge shortfall in visitors to Coventry City Council's The Wave water park

The Wave in Coventry is getting about a million fewer visits annually than predicted, the BBC finds.
www.bbc.co.uk
Click to expand...
Ridiculously expensive, I'm not living in Coventry now but out of interest where can people just go swimming now?.
 

LastGarrison

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 27, 2025
  • #478
nicksar said:
Ridiculously expensive, I'm not living in Coventry now but out of interest where can people just go swimming now?.
Click to expand...
Alan Higgs, AT7, The Village, Cally Castle school all of the top of my head.

Think Livingstone baths has gone.
 
Reactions: Sky Blue Pete and nicksar

LastGarrison

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 27, 2025
  • #479
Looks like we’re getting a Pret at the train station.

Massive.
 
Reactions: mmttww, AOM and Sick Boy

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 27, 2025
  • #480
LastGarrison said:
Looks like we’re getting a Pret at the train station.

Massive.
Click to expand...
Getting a Five Guys by the CBS, Council pulling out all the stops to keep Lampard happy.
 
Reactions: Sky Blue Pete and nicksar

DT-R

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 27, 2025
  • #481
hill83 said:
It’s way too expensive
Click to expand...
It is, and it isnt. If you get your Go CV card you can bring it down by a couple of quid per person.

In terms of other water parks there's not much else immediately comparable. Waterworld in Stoke is bigger and therefore more expensive. You also get longer in Waterworld. Splash Landings is dearer but less slides (you're paying Merlin though for the name) and 2.5hours the same time as the Wave.

Splashdown in Poole is probably the best for value! £20 for 2 hours with 13 slides last time we went. Its just not sensible for a day trip if saving money is your plan.

The Wave is cheaper than both Alton Towers and Waterworld, but you get more at Waterworld. In summary, for a quick day out, The Wave is fine. For a better value day out, go to Stoke.

Also, if people are looking for ideas for half term, Waterworld are doing a ticket offer atm. £35 for entry to waterworld and West Midlands safari park. Ill link it.

Online Tickets | Waterworld Leisure Resort Online Tickets | Waterworld Leisure Resort

Sent from my SM-S711B using Tapatalk
 
Reactions: Sky Blue Pete

ccfctommy

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 27, 2025
  • #482
I used to work in the building before it was the wave!

It doesn't seem to open a lot of the time. Plus the price of parking in town.
 

Marty

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 27, 2025
  • #483
hill83 said:
It’s way too expensive
Click to expand...

Even just going for a swim is too expensive. £7.20 a pop or £6.50 with a go CV membership (not sure if they offer a monthly membership). If you go semi regular (3x a week). It's actually far cheaper and more convenient to just sign up to somewhere like the village.
 
Reactions: Sky Blue Pete

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 27, 2025
  • #484
In fairness to the council, energy costs are >60% higher than when it was planned, which impacts both the cost of running it and the ability of people to afford to attend. Successive UK government's failure to address this is catastrophic for the UK economy.
 

AOM

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 27, 2025
  • #485
Brighton Sky Blue said:
Getting a Five Guys by the CBS, Council pulling out all the stops to keep Lampard happy.
Click to expand...

Think I read Popeyes Chicken is opening at the Tesco Arena Park as well.
#RiseTogether
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 27, 2025
  • #486
Marty said:
Even just going for a swim is too expensive. £7.20 a pop or £6.50 with a go CV membership (not sure if they offer a monthly membership). If you go semi regular (3x a week). It's actually far cheaper and more convenient to just sign up to somewhere like the village.
Click to expand...
I go about 15 times a month to swim at Warwick uni
Costs me about £23/ month
 

Marty

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 27, 2025
  • #487
Sky Blue Pete said:
I go about 15 times a month to swim at Warwick uni
Costs me about £23/ month
Click to expand...

How do you manage to get it so cheap? Quick look has off peak monthly membership at £33. Are you a member of staff?
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 27, 2025
  • #488
Marty said:
How do you manage to get it so cheap? Quick look has off peak monthly membership at £33. Are you a member of staff?
Click to expand...
Ah that’s why yep I’m a member of staffs additional person
Swim only membership though
 
Reactions: nicksar
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 27, 2025
  • #489
nicksar said:
Ridiculously expensive, I'm not living in Coventry now but out of interest where can people just go swimming now?.
Click to expand...
Ask at arms length CV life, refused to respond/reply but Sets prices, nice for the charity though who get 210 visitors per week after being made homeless from the arcade.
 
Reactions: nicksar

DT-R

Well-Known Member
  • Oct 27, 2025
  • #490
AOM said:
Think I read Popeyes Chicken is opening at the Tesco Arena Park as well.
#RiseTogether
Click to expand...
Just tilt your head back and let the meat slide down your throat hole!
Popeyes chicken is fucking awesome!

Great film!

Sent from my SM-S711B using Tapatalk
 
Reactions: AOM
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
Next
First Prev 14 of 15 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • General Discussion
  • Off Topic Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?