oldskyblue58
CCFC Finance Director
here we go again.............. :banghead:
Date revealed for CCFC Ricoh Arena court battle over Wasps sale
Date revealed for CCFC Ricoh Arena court battle over Wasps sale
And just as we were getting enthused about early signings such as Doyle and possible non-league strikers, this rears it's head again.Wouldn't be a proper summer without it.
and to think not many weeks ago Fisher said it had been suspended and nothing other than bits of legal procedure to keep it open going on
and of course nothing to do with CCFC:facepalm:
Like you said "Fisher said"and to think not many weeks ago Fisher said it had been suspended and nothing other than bits of legal procedure to keep it open going on
and of course nothing to do with CCFC:facepalm:
Indeed it is. This is just One Step Beyond.Madness
Gives us something to debate over the close seasonAnd just as we were getting enthused about early signings such as Doyle and possible non-league strikers, this rears it's head again.
1 small step forward then 3 backwards.
as I understand it this is presenting the outline case to a judge to get permission to go to a full hearing............... this will run for months even years
So someone remind me what this one is actually about. Is this the main one against Wasps for the council loan or something? Will it be the same stuff as before with appeals and stuff? What can actually happen afterwards?
You forgotIndeed it is. This is just One Step Beyond.
I wish Sisu would just Shut Up.
The Ricoh is never going to be Our House.
So someone remind me what this one is actually about. Is this the main one against Wasps for the council loan or something? Will it be the same stuff as before with appeals and stuff? What can actually happen afterwards?
It's just another JR examining a different council action, under the same grounds that the council breached State Aid regulations, this time about the sale of ACL to Wasps rather than loaning ACL money.
JR2 is a case in which the litigants make an almost diametrically opposed argument to JR1.
In JR1 it was argued the lease was practically worthless, in JR2 the argument will be that it was sold at a significantly less vale than it was worth.
The situation sucks big time, it simply keeps the club unstable and unable to move back to where the only fully professional football club in the 9th largest City in the UK righly belongs.
Excuse me now I'm popping outside to scream at the world.
JR1 wasn't about the value of the lease. It was about the council loaning money to a company at rates that an open market lender wouldn't due to the company's financial position.
Cheers. So it's against the council still but about the sale of ACL to Wasps?
And like before I take it only damages could be awarded? They can't undo the decision?
Can someone do a list of their arguments from JR1 (5 IIRC) so we can play a sort of JR bingo and tick them of when they argue against their own arguments from JR1 in JR2. It seems to me that they'll have to.
Fisher: "Its not our fault "
Bingo..
Where's my prize?
Maybe we can sign it for a central midfielder?
One step beyondYou forgot
Madness they call it madness
your an embarrassment
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?