Nick
Administrator
I am not sticking up for anybody, I just want to know the actual truths whether it is SISU, Council, ACL etc etc. Anybody who has had a part to play.
That's better you are seeing them for the bullshitters they are. where are the accounts for the time they have been here and we can check where the money has gone an how much investment they have really made - £50m of course it is. They need to go. This is not personal against you but why does anyone stick up for them. Same goes for the council too. Look at our team the league table and our crowds what a fuck up by all involved.
Has it been proven in the accounts or anything that player sales is actually funding court cases in any way?
I reckon it has gone on dildos and gimp masks. .
Err no Nick, it will hardly be logged as an entry will it but no doubt somewhere along the line these court costs shall be loaded against the debts of the football club. I might be wrong in this { feel free to advise} but it would also give more credibility to liquidating the club on a whim if we continue to run insolvently. More questions would surely be asked if we were making a small profit each term.
I am not sticking up for anybody, I just want to know the actual truths whether it is SISU, Council, ACL etc etc. Anybody who has had a part to play.
Come on Nick, be honest, at least with yourself: you're not explicity defending SISU, no, but you are attempting to "debunk" an argument often used by people when they are criticising SISU. By proxy, this is in effect defending SISU, don't act dumb, you know that.
No, I am not trying to "debunk" it, I am trying to see if it is proven or truths behind it? It may well be, it may not. I don't know but would be good to know the actual truth wouldn't it?
But surely you agree that it's impossible to know for sure? Certainly nobody posting on here knows. It seems logical to assume it's thrue though as SISU aren't exactly pumping money into the playing side, but they've taken quite a lot out of it. At the same time, they have been pissing money away on futile and ill-advised court cases almost constantly. I doubt they'd be doing that if it wasn't coming out of their "CCFC Pot".
Has it been proven in the accounts or anything that player sales is actually funding court cases in any way?
Has it been proven in the accounts or anything that player sales is actually funding court cases in any way?
It's nonsense... peddled by scaremongers and lapped up by fucking idiots.
Oh well that's resolved everything. Thanks for your evidence. Oh, and you're indirect calling half the forum "fucking idiots", very subtle...
Indirectly....
If you can find a single shred of evidence that shows we sold a football player and that money went directly to pay for a court case I will apologise.
Until then I'll assume that we'll go on the notion of it being bollocks.
People don't seem to keep an open Mind so they? That's my point!Lol, yeah, you would. The rest of us will keep an open mind to a very real possibility.
People don't seem to keep an open Mind so they? That's my point!
SISU are supposed to owe US based investors a considerable sum for their ill fated adventure into the British sporting / property market.
Doesn't this rumour come from someone who spoke to Fisher in Sainsbury's?
Indirectly....
If you can find a single shred of evidence that shows we sold a football player and that money went directly to pay for a court case I will apologise.
Until then I'll assume that we'll go on the notion of it being bollocks.
The rumour probably does come from Sainsburys and probably worthless. However someone, somewhere is out of pocket or can you prove otherwise?
People don't seem to keep an open Mind so they? That's my point!
The rumour probably does come from Sainsburys and probably worthless. However someone, somewhere is out of pocket or can you prove otherwise?
No I can't prove it and neither can you prove someone is out of pocket. For all we know the investors have made a profit in other areas of sisu's portfolio. Those who believe that sisu are struggling financially are naive to say the least.
I walked on Mars yesterday - can you prove otherwise?
Has it been proven in the accounts or anything that player sales is actually funding court cases in any way?
I walked on Mars yesterday - can you prove otherwise?
So let me just make sure I understand the general thinking here:
Money going on court cases doesn't affect the playing budget.
Money going on stadium rent does affect the playing budget,
You are high up in the business world. If expenses are incured on a court case how can it not reduce expenditure in other areas.
Also the balance of probability suggests you never walked on Mars yesterday, it also suggests your business status is probably higher than your intelligence.
I walked on Mars yesterday - can you prove otherwise?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?