Grendel
Well-Known Member
The sycophantic morons will justify the council stance. Don't worry.
Is Simon Gilbert now to be hated?
An article about ACL having no decent gigs lined up. Followed by this!
Doesn't seem ACL are too keen to send the cash they owe having illegally charged them since 2005.
The passive acceptance of fans to the council and its quangos desire to rio the club off makes me sick.
The sycophantic morons will justify the council stance. Don't worry.
Maybe not a million tbf skybluesam but your point is a good one and more money in the coffers and could be spent on the team and a fair rent of 100-150k rent with loads left over for that investment in the team and dare I say it even a promotion? It makes me so sad, angry and frustrated. It just seems so easy to me.
LC - circa 1million
Arsenal game say 250-500k
Cheque paid 399k
All of the above was within a week and its almost 2 million pounds with say the rent free offer or reduced 150k rent then there is a lot to invest and get a good team together instead of spunking it all away. Not to mention increased season tickets sale and merchandise, sponsors....... arrrrgggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
and breathe.
Doesn't seem ACL are too keen to send the cash they owe having illegally charged them since 2005.
The passive acceptance of fans to the council and its quangos desire to rio the club off makes me sick.
Although agree about the rent, the fact Northampton makes no financial sense, even at the Ricoh that money would be used to cover operating costs and losses and not necessarily be used to invest and get a good team together. We lost £7m last season at the Ricoh whilst not paying rent (yes, we have reduced the wage bill since)
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
Doesn't seem ACL are too keen to send the cash they owe having illegally charged them since 2005.
The passive acceptance of fans to the council and its quangos desire to rio the club off makes me sick.
To be honest all it shows is Simon actually just tells it as it is as oppose to pushing his own campaign
Fair point but the rent was 1.3m plus costs and wage bill double what it is now so I guess there is 3million saved straight away but still 4m loss. Makes you wonder how you lose 7m really.
Doesn't seem ACL are too keen to send the cash they owe having illegally charged them since 2005.
The passive acceptance of fans to the council and its quangos desire to rio the club off makes me sick.
Doesn't seem ACL are too keen to send the cash they owe having illegally charged them since 2005.
The passive acceptance of fans to the council and its quangos desire to rio the club off makes me sick.
Finally...an informative and impartial postWorth noting that the council doesn't set the rates. It only collects them.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Worth noting that the council doesn't set the rates. It only collects them.
Do you know how Otium get money owed to CCFC Ltd in liquidation?
Why doesn't it go to CCFC Ltd's creditors?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
As it seems that the council do not set the rates, i guess that makes your post look, in your own words, 'stupid'disgusting overcharging people trying to kill the club.
they made their followers looks stupid on here too, so not all bad
The money belonged to ccfc ltd - but as Otium bought out all assets, the money was rightfully paid to Otium.
Expected comments from the council haters.
Money paid to the club and probably spent by now.
Non story really, we knew a rebate was due....
I love how his snidey comment is more annoying than what appears to be the club being overcharged for years.
Doesn't seem ACL are too keen to send the cash they owe having illegally charged them since 2005.
The passive acceptance of fans to the council and its quangos desire to rio the club off makes me sick.
The rates are paid to the council, it is why the council sent the refund to CCFC. This means the council sent the bill to CCFC which means if their is any money owed it is the council who have it not ACL you idiot.
The council sent the rebate to the owners of the club as they had overpaid on the rates, which means they had paid the council not ACL. So ACL do not owe money to the owners of CCFC, it is CCFC who owe money to ACL and are not very quick to pay it. News for you when they were at the ricoh, the CCFC accounts department were told to never pay on time and keep them waiting as it annoyed ACL and the Higgs.What are you on about? Have you even read the article?
The council sent the rebate to the owners of the club as they had overpaid on the rates, which means they had paid the council not ACL. So ACL do not owe money to the owners of CCFC, it is CCFC who owe money to ACL and are not very quick to pay it. News for you when they were at the ricoh, the CCFC accounts department were told to never pay on time and keep them waiting as it annoyed ACL and the Higgs.
The council sent the rebate to the owners of the club as they had overpaid on the rates, which means they had paid the council not ACL. So ACL do not owe money to the owners of CCFC, it is CCFC who owe money to ACL and are not very quick to pay it. News for you when they were at the ricoh, the CCFC accounts department were told to never pay on time and keep them waiting as it annoyed ACL and the Higgs.
The council sent the rebate to the owners of the club as they had overpaid on the rates, which means they had paid the council not ACL. So ACL do not owe money to the owners of CCFC, it is CCFC who owe money to ACL and are not very quick to pay it. News for you when they were at the ricoh, the CCFC accounts department were told to never pay on time and keep them waiting as it annoyed ACL and the Higgs.
Yes, but the point is that ACL have to cover the shortfall to the council. Can you explain why?
I pray for the day we moan about players like Leon Barnett again.
I can understand why ACL aren't keen for it to be backdated to 2005, and our club are, most people are the same with taxes. Is there a 'statute of limitations' like income tax on how far back these things can be looked at retroactively? ACL I would guess owe the council for the shortfall because they would be the lease holder of the bowl when our club wasn't.
I've got no love for the council as they're not my council.I make the point that it's great that we've got the money and can use that to secure ownership of the Golden Share (unless they can cut a deal with the league) and you take that as some sort of acceptance of the council?
We might need a promotion before we can even do that. How far we have fallen, even lower than Leon Barnett's sights.
Because it is money that they should have paid in the first place but was wrongly charged to the club instead?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?