It isn't the value of the build is it? It is the value of ACL isn't it?
The council themselves thought that the Higgs shares at £5.5m were way over priced, so if they think £11m is way over priced then what value do they give it?
Does that mean if it's worth more than sisu are willing to pay sisu will be announcing it from the roof tops?
Does that mean if it's worth more than sisu are willing to pay sisu will be announcing it from the roof tops?
Would anyone like to explain how it could have a value of less than 14m? How much value would a smaller build be worth without everything the arena has if it is built in the Coventry area?
It isn't the value of the build is it? It is the value of ACL isn't it?
ACL is not the building.
It isn't the value of the build is it? It is the value of ACL isn't it?
The council themselves thought that the Higgs shares at £5.5m were way over priced, so if they think £11m is way over priced then what value do they give it?
Somebody must be saying something, how else would sisu know this other stuff they are after exists?
But the lease is for the building. And it has over 40 years to go.
Again, I'm not sure I buy the Sisu are tactical geniuses line. Could be bog standard fishing exercise. But if someone has, why not go public and claim the electoral rewards for whistleblowing?
I'm not saying they are geniuses and it could just be fishing.
It said in the CET that all council people are banned from talking to SISU, lawyers orders. Maybe they are shit scared?
I'm not saying they are geniuses and it could just be fishing.
It said in the CET that all council people are banned from talking to SISU, lawyers orders. Maybe they are shit scared?
Or maybe they are fed up of SISU twisting everything. Most of us are. If you don't speak to them they can't twist what you say.
I'm not saying they are geniuses and it could just be fishing.
It said in the CET that all council people are banned from talking to SISU, lawyers orders. Maybe they are shit scared?
I'm not saying they are geniuses and it could just be fishing.
It said in the CET that all council people are banned from talking to SISU, lawyers orders. Maybe they are shit scared?
I'm not saying they are geniuses and it could just be fishing.
It said in the CET that all council people are banned from talking to SISU, lawyers orders. Maybe they are shit scared?
What have they twisted what you said?
Surely they can't twist something if it is there in black and white?
Yesterday you were saying Timmy was twisting about paying the police directly, which was wrong.
If they have evidence and go to court using it as their evidence, of course they will try to twist it their way. The same as CCC will try and twist it theirs.
I'm not sure they've been banned from talking to SISU as much as advised by the legal department to refrain from commenting on the case. I think this is fairly common when you've got a big legal case coming up - the idea is that you don't want to give the other side something that they'll try to twist around to suit their case. And you probably don't want to find yourself dragged into court as a witness either, which is the other possiblity. Have a read of the Higgs transcripts again if you want to see how things get used in the court, and judge whether you'd fancy seeing yourself on the stand.
Sh*t scared is an interesting phrase - do you think SISU are sh*t scared about discussing the current or past accounts? It's just that I notice that they're not as forthcoming as they might be either.
Don't be silly. If there's wrongdoing in an organisation you can't be "banned" from talking about it. What would they do to you? You'd be an elected official serving your constituents.
I just find is funny that the only person close to the council who will speak out at all is the mental Spurs fan guy that's split from almost every party he's been with and appears to be another Sinclaire.
Basically, I just wonder why no-one with any credibility in this is speaking out for Sisu. Councils are notoriously leaky when it comes to information and from what I gather from the outside Coventry Labour party isn't always a bastion of harmony (like, I'm sure all local parties).
Just seems odd, that's all. All it would take is one person to leak the minutes, or even just to speak out publicly, but as far as I know no council member has (unless I missed it).
Oh wow. This is a new level of Stockholm Syndrome for you mate. No, Sisu never twist what has happened or in fact lie outright to taint people. No. Never.
Also must be "shit scared" of discussing the new stadium.
I like this new measure. Nick and Grendel didn't mention the Labovitch meetings because they were shit scared.
Works for all kinds of things.
I'm not sure they've been banned from talking to SISU as much as advised by the legal department to refrain from commenting on the case. I think this is fairly common when you've got a big legal case coming up - the idea is that you don't want to give the other side something that they'll try to twist around to suit their case. And you probably don't want to find yourself dragged into court as a witness either, which is the other possiblity. Have a read of the Higgs transcripts again if you want to see how things get used in the court, and judge whether you'd fancy seeing yourself on the stand.
Sh*t scared is an interesting phrase - do you think SISU are sh*t scared about discussing the current or past accounts? It's just that I notice that they're not as forthcoming as they might be either.
Cmon Nick you and Grendel are the Sisu plants . We all know itI know what you mean and have no idea if they do have a leak somewhere but it is quiet until the JR. I agree it is strange there is no "hero" or "SISU plant" who has come out and gone all Wikileaks.
What have they twisted what you said?
Surely they can't twist something if it is there in black and white?
I'm not sure they've been banned from talking to SISU as much as advised by the legal department to refrain from commenting on the case. I think this is fairly common when you've got a big legal case coming up - the idea is that you don't want to give the other side something that they'll try to twist around to suit their case. And you probably don't want to find yourself dragged into court as a witness either, which is the other possiblity. Have a read of the Higgs transcripts again if you want to see how things get used in the court, and judge whether you'd fancy seeing yourself on the stand.
Sh*t scared is an interesting phrase - do you think SISU are sh*t scared about discussing the current or past accounts? It's just that I notice that they're not as forthcoming as they might be either.
All city councillors are under lawyers’ orders not to converse with the ‘enemy’ ahead of the High Court shoot-out in June between the city council and Sky Blues owners Sisu.
There was an article in the CET saying the word "banned" and an awkward situation where ML said hello to somebody and the other person stuttered and walked off.
Ah, not banned just "advised by the legal department to refrain from commenting". Totally different.
Now you are twisting what I said.
I said we are fed up of them twisting everything. You ask me what have they twisted what I have said.
The offer of rent free was made. SISU said it wasn't made to them, making out as though the offer wasn't made as they didn't want to accept it. They are trying to devalue the Ricoh.
I showed the ACL statement where they said about the policing being included as part of the expenses for the rent free and 150k for the two years after. You said they had never said so. Timothy had said that the ploicing still had to be paid.....or are the ones always backing what SISU are attempting twisting things for him? Not me twisting it. Are you?
Of course they will twist things in court. Just like they did against Higgs, including the value of the Ricoh.
Yes, totally different. what's your point torch?
Updated: http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/sky-blues-owners-try-force-7116163
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Absolutely no point at all. Just being mischievous to Duffer, Astute, Shmmeee and their "mates" at the council.
Fair enough. Pity your never mischievous to others, like Nick, or Grendel....
Absolutely no point at all. Just being mischievous to Duffer, Astute, Shmmeee and their "mates" at the council.
When are you going to get back to posting about CCFC instead of just coming on to slag off fans? As it is literally all you have done for the past few months.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?