Obesity is a strange thing. I am classed as Obese although I'm not fat and not unhealthy just big made (OK, I'm diabetic but have been told that's more hereditary than anything else) . I exercise and hardly eat so there's not much more I can do on that score - then again I don't visit the hospital etc regularly so don't use up the resources except for my regular blood tests and medication. The issue with these sort of reports is they bundle people into groups and everyone in that group is looked down upon. Also, there are people who, for no fault of their own, can't exercise to lose weight because that have health problems that contribute to this.
As for mental issues - yes some people are mentally weaker than others but as a society we don't help. If the human race as a whole took a different approach and instead looking down on everybody who is different to them and helped people maybe things would change - but then there are a lot of selfish people in the world.
The NHS should be for anything that is wrong physically and possibly mentally (counselling etc) but anything to "improve" self image through surgery etc should be paid for by the individual not the NHS.
Well they don't even know for sure that the cause is diet or lack of exercise so why would they do that?They should whack up the cost of unhealthy food and teach proper food education in schools. The overall diet of the country is unhealthy and a lot of people eat too much. There also needs to be a lot more investment in locals sports facilities across the country. Every village should have some kind of outdoor space/playground/football pitch for kids to get out and play.
Skybluegod, out of curiosity, are you ok with the foreigners and freeloaders using the NHS that some of us fatties contribute to?
Skybluegod, out of curiosity, are you ok with the foreigners and freeloaders using the NHS that some of us fatties contribute to?
Skybluegod, out of curiosity, are you ok with the foreigners and freeloaders using the NHS that some of us fatties contribute to?
Well they don't even know for sure that the cause is diet or lack of exercise so why would they do that?
That may be a factor, but not the entire story. What is needed is more research on the cause or causes.
Personally, I think it is most likely something either in the food, water or air that is disrupting the body's natural processes.
Something disrupting the metabolism or hormones, something introduced in the last 50-75 years.
'The foreigners' also contribute to the NHS, so are every bit as entitled to use it as you are.
He's referring to health tourism
"Foreigners and free loaders"- there is no mention of health tourism. I'd rather he clarified for himself.
nope, that's my level I'm afraidAh I thought there was a funnier joke than that that I was missing
For some reason it seems that weight is something that is acceptable to discriminate against.
Wow something we agree on ey SBI think it is down to a lack of exercise, over eating and over drinking rather than some kind of conspiracy.
I think it is down to a lack of exercise, over eating and over drinking rather than some kind of conspiracy.
Yes I generally agree with this post. Society is having to foot the bill for Billions of Pounds to treat 'Preventable' diseases................those people are the ones that folk bring on themselves with smoking, drinking and overindulgence. I do hope my livers holding up, it has had a fair old job to do over the last 30 years or so, in all seriousness though it is a valid point !There was a piece in the Gaurdian today about the cost of obesity hitting $1.2 trillion world wide by 2025.
In Britain it is 19 billion at the moment and it will rise to 31 billion.
The chief executive of the NHS, has warned that obesity threatens to bankrupt the NHS. Just really pisses me off, clearly the cuts on the NHS are bad and it needs more funding, but then you see things like this and it really pisses me off.
People complain about the NHS’s lack of funding, and the long waits for appointments, well if more people looked after themselves, and just regulated what they ate, then think about how much of a burden would be lifted on the overstretched heath service.
Yes people should have free will go eat and do what they like, but where does it stop? Considering the most expensive things in terms of healthcare budget are obesity and smoking related, think it’s too easy to blame government budget cuts rather than take on the blame as a society.
Can you make that nigh on a million Poles now !The easy get out to avoid the wrath of the “outraged of Coventry” would be to say that I did only mean health tourism … but that was only part of the reason. Also a little disappointing haul, I was trying to trip him up a bit and expected the stock response surrounding the NHS relying on overseas workers within the NHS, I purposely threw in the freeloaders comments as that also often provokes a reaction. I would add that many of those workers come from outside the EU, but not trying to turn this thread into another Brexit debate.
Anyway … the points with foreign cost to the NHS are (imo) varied. Health tourism is one, but also the additional and unsustainable costs of sending NHS funding abroad. My understanding is that if an EU member who is a UK citizen is treated abroad (even back in their original country) then they are entitled to claim from the NHS for the cost of that treatment, how can that be right? I also read that we pay 70 times the cost to the rest of the EU for healthcare of UK/EU citizens outside the UK (costing the NHS close to £1bn per year), that also shouldn’t be happening – we pay Poland 4 times the value that we receive back and yet 500,000+ poles reside in the UK and only a fraction of UK citizens moving in the opposite direction. Finally, yes we do rely on overseas help within the NHS and a valid reason for keeping immigration, particularly those with skills that we are lacking in the UK, but also if immigration wasn’t so high, then we wouldn’t need such a resource to look after them too.
In short my original point is that if in the future in part due to excess weight I had something like a heart attack, then having contributed all my working life, I would expect to be treated without any complaint. For some reason it seems that weight is something that is acceptable to discriminate against.
It isn't just weight. I don't think anybody is saying anybody slightly overweight must suddenly become a bodybuilder. It is more the clinically obese people who are more than happy to literally sit and eat and constantly be ill from it.
I'd say the same against people who smoke etc. I can understand it is an addiction but if they have no interest in quitting while they have related illnesses because of it. If people are trying their hardest to quit then it's a different story.
It's a dangerous way to go though is t it;
Do you treat drivers in road traffic accidents who've been speeding, using mobiles, not wearing seat belts
Do you treat any addicts of any description at all
Do you ask bowel cancer patients what they've ate and when you find bacon sandwiches every day tell them to go home
If a drive isn't wearing a seat belt for example, I'd have no issue with there being an excess on their treatment.
I am not saying refuse to treat them and let them die, but again if they are an addict not interested at all in any help then again no issue with it being self inflicted. However, if they are battling it / actively trying to overcome it then it's a different situation.
Nothing worse than going to a hospital or doctors and seeing a big crowd outside smoking, when they are obviously there because something is wrong with them.
Take a guess at how much free prescription paracetamol costs the NHS a year
Our doctor advises when a cheaper option to a prescription drug is available over the counter.
I'd say the same against people who smoke etc. I can understand it is an addiction but if they have no interest in quitting while they have related illnesses because of it. If people are trying their hardest to quit then it's a different story.
Good God, you have a heart!It's a dangerous way to go though is t it;
Do you treat drivers in road traffic accidents who've been speeding, using mobiles, not wearing seat belts
Do you treat any addicts of any description at all
Do you ask bowel cancer patients what they've ate and when you find bacon sandwiches every day tell them to go home
Our doctor advises when a cheaper option to a prescription drug is available over the counter.
I think some people get a "free prescription" for Paracetamol that's free to the person but for some reason costs the NHS over £3 for something you can get for pennies from any shop.
Now we're getting somewhere......
The NHS is already "privatised" in many respects.......I'm not sure of figures, but I know that massive facility management & procurement corporations already provide in-house services for all the NHS trusts......Serco, G4S, Capita etc. etc. all make tasty profits from the public purse by simply adding delay & massive cost (they call it adding "value") to simple tasks like supplying IT equipment, latex gloves, lightbulbs etc. etc.
Tricky issue to deal with as the NHS organisation is basically too big to manage efficiently.....but as a huge customer, its clear to me that the NHS should be paying considerably less for its consumables etc. and really should squeeze the fuck out of its supply chain....
But I do think younger generations are a lot weaker mentally than ever before and that needs to change.
Good God, you have a heart!
Dont be daft, we are in the midst of an always on, always contactable technology, this is having an effect on more and more people, not just youngsters, but people with smart phones answering work emails etc. They are not weaker, they are just stimulated in a different fashion to when I was a kid. EG, I used to ride my BMX on the track by the Morris Common, I soon realised that if I fell off it hurt, but also got a thrill if I achieved a jump etc, but the crucial bit is I learned of risk / reward while also burning off calories / excess hormones.
Today's kid, they fail in an electronic world (IE playing a computer game) it doesn't hurt, they complete a game etc they still have the thrill and exhilaration but are not burning off calories or excess hormones. Just because its different to how previous generations grew up, doesn't make them weaker.
Our senses now are constantly battered, we can watch what we want, when we want, how we want. Kids growing up are usually the early adopters of new technology and are probably more plugged in to the way of todays world therefore fel the effects of this more than an adult, who can obtain a release in a different way, they dont have the emotional intelligence to deal with the world, are full of hormones therefore more susceptible to stimuli, hence the ever increasing metal health issues we are seeing, also with a growing acceptance of this illness people are now more likely to talk, and to recognise it. Another thing to consider is the role of previous generations in shaping the current youth.
It's not realistic is it and impossible to draw the line. There are plenty of savings to be made but the system is there to save lives - it can educate sure but has to be responsible to treat everyone.
Most addicts anyway most have some form of addiction trigger in their brain chemistry so let's not bother helping anorexic sufferers either.
Slippery slope.
It's not saying outright refuse them and let them die. I'd say more like a "penalty" system like an excess.
"Look Dave / Keith / Ian, this is your 20th appointment so far in 2 months. You really need to start trying to help yourself a bit here" type thing.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?