Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Club vote in favour of the new EFL trophy setup (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter SkyBlueDom26
  • Start date Jun 20, 2016
Forums New posts

SkyBlueDom26

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 20, 2016
  • #1
Club statement following English Football League announcement of Trophy changes…



Coventry City FC can confirm that the club voted in favour of piloting the new EFL Trophy competition set-up for the 2016/17 season.

The one season trial for 2016/17 will include 64 teams made up of EFL League One and League Two clubs, plus an additional 16 Category 1 Premier League Academy/Under-21 sides.

Central to the competition will be the introduction of a new group stage format with 16 regional groups of four teams. The top two teams will progress to the knockout stages of the competition with the final staged at Wembley Stadium in April 2017.

The club’s decision to support the League's proposal (strictly for one season only) was carefully considered and not taken lightly, with three main reasons for the vote in favour.

1. The new format is a pilot project designed to rejuvenate the competition. All clubs agreed on the need for a fresh approach to the competition (which is currently unsponsored) and the vast majority of clubs voted in favour of changing the competition format. Many clubs, Coventry City included, expressed concern over the low attendances at League Trophy matches in recent years and the need to find ways in which to boost interest.

2. The new EFL Trophy format is a one-year pilot project that will be reviewed at next year's annual EFL meeting. The competition format will be under constant consultation with all clubs throughout the one-year trial period. In fact, all EFL clubs are currently providing input into the finer details of the competition format – that is, before the 2016/17 Trophy gets underway.

3. The change to the new format will provide significantly increased revenue from central funding, match-day receipts, and TV and prize money (which will be doubled for next season). The financial potential offered by the new competition format was something the club had to consider seriously and could ill afford to lose out on.

Speaking to the Coventry Telegraph about the proposed changes, Tony Mowbray said: “I haven’t got a problem with it. They are academy teams who will be very well coached and the football is not always about the result, rather the development of their players.

“It’s an interesting experiment, I’d have to say, to have Under-21 sides from the likes of Man United, Chelsea or Liverpool against Coventry City. But we want to win every competition we go into.”
 

hill83

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 20, 2016
  • #2
As I said in the other thread about this



It's a completely meaningless cup.
 
Reactions: stupot07, SkyBlueSid, SkyBlueRuffian and 1 other person

SkyBlueDom26

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 20, 2016
  • #3
hill83 said:
As I said in the other thread about this



It's a completely meaningless cup.
Click to expand...
A great chance to go to Wembley though now made much harder.
 

hill83

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 20, 2016
  • #4
SkyBlueDom26 said:
A great chance to go to Wembley though now made much harder.
Click to expand...

Don't get me wrong, Wembley would be a good day out and I'd make full use of it. But still. Meaningless cup.
 
Reactions: Sick Boy and SkyBlueDom26

SkyBlueDom26

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 20, 2016
  • #5
hill83 said:
Don't get me wrong, Wembley would be a good day out and I'd make full use of it. But still. Meaningless cup.
Click to expand...
Agree. If Mowbray is fully focuses on the league then it gets in the way however it would be a great day out.
 
Reactions: The Reverend Skyblue

Skyblueweeman

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 20, 2016
  • #6
hill83 said:
As I said in the other thread about this



It's a completely meaningless cup.
Click to expand...

Could be a day out at Wembley though (as unlikely as it is).

EDIT: Just saw your comment about Wembley!
 
Reactions: SkyBlueDom26

Wyken Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 20, 2016
  • #7
Disappointed by the club's decision. Much rather they didn't vote at all.

Sent from my E5823 using Tapatalk
 

Skyblueweeman

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 20, 2016
  • #8
skyblue1991 said:
Disappointed by the club's decision. Much rather they didn't vote at all.

Sent from my E5823 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Kind of agree but if they didn't vote, some would still castigate them.
If revenue is doubled then, that can only be a good thing. I like the idea of the group stages as well, for this trial. Be interesting to see what changes, if any, it has.
 

jimmyhillsfanclub

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 20, 2016
  • #9
The way some of our fans go on about the JPT is a bit bizarre IMHO......

Its a tin-pot 2-bob cup that just simply does not matter.....and keep in mind we are also pretty shit as a cup team.....4 out of 4 round 1 exits last season for example...

Just play the academy side in it (while we've still got one)
 

Skyblueweeman

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 20, 2016
  • #10
jimmyhillsfanclub said:
The way some of our fans go on about the JPT is a bit bizarre IMHO......

Its a tin-pot 2-bob cup that just simply does not matter.....and keep in mind we are also pretty shit as a cup team.....4 out of 4 round 1 exits last season for example...

Just play the academy side in it (while we've still got one)
Click to expand...

Off course it matters. You realise that if you progress, you get more money, right? (point taken about recent records though). We obviously need all the money we can get so why would getting extra revenue into the club be a bad thing.

And say we did get to the final and god forbide, even win it....after all we've been through as a club, that would do wonders for us in terms of profile, spirit, finances, recruitment etc. It might also help some local govt bodies appreciate that a certain city isn't necessarily a 'City of Rugby'...
 
Reactions: Ian1779 and Covstu

oldskyblue58

CCFC Finance Director
  • Jun 20, 2016
  • #11
Its all about the money, personally I think it has become a pointless worthless cup, but if it gets CCFC extra revenue then that has to be good.
 

jimmyhillsfanclub

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 20, 2016
  • #12
I'll reserve judgement on the alleged extra revenue.....

I understand the TOTAL prize fund has been increased.......but the number of teams who will share it has also been increased & the number of games to be played has also increased......that's more matchday & admin costs to shoulder & I just can't see a rise in the attendances just because you can watch us play against Watfords or Middlesboro U21's instead of York City on a Tuesday night......

Play the academy lads & concentrate on the league please Mr. Mowbray.
 

Terry Gibson's perm

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 20, 2016
  • #13
Great so instead of clubs that need the tv revenue getting it, the tv companies will always put on man Utd etc.

More games so more cost to the fans.
 
B

BoomShanka

Member
  • Jun 20, 2016
  • #14
How long before we see Premier league development teams in the lower leagues? Sets a worrying precedent for me.
 
W

woody11462

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 20, 2016
  • #15
There will have been conversations between lower league clubs and premier league clubs about this. Maybe we decided to vote this way to keep some premier league clubs sweet for future loans, etc?
 

ccfcway

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 20, 2016
  • #16
Terry Gibson's perm said:
Great so instead of clubs that need the tv revenue getting it, the tv companies will always put on man Utd etc.

More games so more cost to the fans.
Click to expand...

I just cant see the draw of even Man Utd reserves v Liverpool reserves, let alone Man Utd reserves v Crewe
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 20, 2016
  • #17
ccfcway said:
I just cant see the draw of even Man Utd reserves v Liverpool reserves, let alone Man Utd reserves v Crewe
Click to expand...
No draw allowed. Goes straight to pens.
 

better days

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 20, 2016
  • #18
Even the best Premier League U21 teams only have perhaps 2 or 3 players per team who will go on to play regularly at Premier League level.
The rest will play FL level or in many cases go out of football altogether when their initial PL or Academy contract isn't renewed
There is a huge gulf between U21 and men's football. The power and desire of senior pros shouldn't be underestimated in games against very young players
League 1 and 2 teams will easily beat the U21 teams even if they field mostly fringe players from the first team squad in my opinion
 

Skyblueweeman

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 20, 2016
  • #19
BoomShanka said:
How long before we see Premier league development teams in the lower leagues? Sets a worrying precedent for me.
Click to expand...

Happens in other leagues. Spain for example.

Not saying that it's right by the way, just that it's not uncommon.
 

italiahorse

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 20, 2016
  • #20
SkyBlueDom26 said:
Agree. If Mowbray is fully focuses on the league then it gets in the way however it would be a great day out.
Click to expand...
Didn't Oxford get to the final and get promoted this season ?
 
Reactions: SkyBlueDom26

Covstu

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 20, 2016
  • #21
For me it's the first step of putting a league presence into the football league. Lower clubs rely on loan players and premier league clubs need them to go out and get that experience, this will deter some of those moves (not all).

Based on the above, I'm out
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 20, 2016
  • #22
I would have liked a day at Wembley under the old format but this all seems a bit pointless. Who wants to go to Wembley to play a cup final against someone else's youth team?
 
Reactions: Terry Gibson's perm, Covstu and Ashdown
A

Ashdown

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 20, 2016
  • #23
The owners just looking for more revenue from a big 'B' side, do they ever look past a chance of a quick pay day. Effectively means the 'trophy' will go to the Premiership big boys. Pointless meaningless crap now !
 

WONDERLAMPS

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 20, 2016
  • #24
Ashdown said:
The owners just looking for more revenue from a big 'B' side, do they ever look past a chance of a quick pay day. Effectively means the 'trophy' will go to the Premiership big boys. Pointless meaningless crap now !
Click to expand...
A team of 18-21 year olds will find it difficult to compete physically. They're not going to steam roll us.
 

Ian1779

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 20, 2016
  • #25
Ashdown said:
The owners just looking for more revenue from a big 'B' side, do they ever look past a chance of a quick pay day. Effectively means the 'trophy' will go to the Premiership big boys. Pointless meaningless crap now !
Click to expand...

So did our owners con all the other clubs that voted yes into doing so to help them make a quick buck.

An alternative way to look at it is that it's a guaranteed 3/4 game block. Yes there may be a bit more revenue but it's also 3 games to blood some youngsters on the cusp of the team, get a loanee or first team player up to match fitness.
 

Mr T - Sukka!

Active Member
  • Jun 20, 2016
  • #26
Its not going to look very good when Chelsea/Man City/Arsenal Under 14's whip our first team.

At least we can call it tin pot and we were not bothered about winning it and Promotion is our real aim.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?