I heard it wasn't even mikel who heard it, it was ramires? No idea who reported it?
Two interesting articles on the subject
firstly Herberts reaction to Clattenberg not being investigated by the Met Police
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/20321225
Then a bit about Herbert himself
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/20315169
My question is why the Clattenberg case ? why not suares, terry, etc .......... racism isnt new. Will he make complaint to the police when any law appears to be broken or will it be some what more selective?
The guy is not a fool by any means, infact he would appear to be extremely clever, but this does smack of self promotion of himself and the Society of Black Lawyers ...... or is that just how the press portray it.
But i still cant get past in my mind the divisive nature of his stance and the body he represents - even the name Society of Black Lawyers points to division. Shouldnt we aim for a society where it is a player not a black, white, pink or brown one. Shouldnt we aim for a society that has lawyers not black or white ones. Isnt that the real point?
Still being investigated by FA but the Met police are taking no action as there is no viable evidence of any offence.
It would seem that Mr Herbert (chairperson of the Society of Black Lawyers), who did not see or hear the alleged offence, was shall we say mistaken ? :thinking about:
Anyone else find this slightly funny? Chelsea claiming racism...have they even met their own fans? Their called the "Animals" for a reason you know..
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?