Bolton weren't playing, their game at Blackburn was called off
Bolton weren't playing, their game at Blackburn was called off
Funny, thought they lost to Peterborough 5-4!
My fault - the BBC reported this incorrectly and I didn't check before posting.
Although I imagine DMC will leave, something in my heart tells me there might be a glimmer of a chance of him staying. Robins seems full of surprises when signing players and maybe Clarke is a show of intent rather than just a replacement. Whatever happens lets just hope for a good run over xmas. Merry Xmas to you all.....let all your xmas's be sky blue.
It's just one person CJ repeating it again and again I believeBolton played on Saturday. Why do people keep saying this?
With this apparent loan deal for Leon Clarke, if McGoldrick remains, could they play together ? From what i see we need a partner for McG not a replacement, MacDonald is a waste of time and ROD well, is ROD.
Could make us a real force in this division if these two became our strike force.
McGoldrick is gone in january thats a definite and was told we would be pleased with his replacement prior to saturdays game
If we end the loans of Henderson, Reckord, Brown and Ball now, that should free up enough wages combined, along with the wages we will currently be paying McG?
Even better if we can get shot of a couple more i.e. ROD, Bell. Kilbane has already fallen on his sword in this regard.
If we end the loans of Henderson, Reckord, Brown and Ball now, that should free up enough wages combined, along with the wages we will currently be paying McG?
I could be wrong here, but isn't there a rule now that only allows a certain percentage of turnover to be spent on transfers and wages ?
If so, then what ever Sisu might save in rent, wouldn't make a difference in regards McGoldrick staying.
My fault - the BBC reported this incorrectly and I didn't check before posting.
</p>Absolutely no chance of McGoldrick staying. Despite SiSU saving £800k/yr when they sign ACL's best offer, there is not a chance in hell of them spending that on the team.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>If they sign Clarke, it will be because he is on the cheap for whatever reason. At best he is going to be a replacement, at worst it is a cynical attempt to placate the fans. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Cov have had quite a few players on trial this season, so it wouldn't surprise me if he doesn't sign!</p>
<p> </p>
<p>He has scored once in the last 5 games. Ultimately there is a reason why Sc-unithorpe didn't sign him - even with 11 goals under his belt!
What connections do You have cloughie.
I don't expect you to name names. However are we talking playing staff, boardroom level, back room staff or general Ricoh staff.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?