I agree that figures far too high, 640 supporters indeed - or are we counting Tim and his dog as two supporters?6.4 supporters...so every thousand supporters would mean only 64 would go to the game, so on a normal 10k gate we would only get 640 if we moved....BOLLOCKS, I hate polls they are misleading and tbh pointless.
6.4 supporters...so every thousand supporters would mean only 64 would go to the game, so on a normal 10k gate we would only get 640 if we moved....BOLLOCKS, I hate polls they are misleading and tbh pointless.
6.4 supporters...so every thousand supporters would mean only 64 would go to the game, so on a normal 10k gate we would only get 640 if we moved....BOLLOCKS, I hate polls they are misleading and tbh pointless.
I guess they're just reporting their findings? Maybe they ought to point out (& maybe they do? I for one do not read te telegraph) that the sample size & the fact that it is Telegraph reading City fans...some of who actually may be Man U or whoever fans really so would never buy a season ticket anyway. Also, if the team played in say Walsall - they might even pick up new fans local to the alternative stadium to compensate for the loss, initially curiosity driving them there. The individual ticket brings in more revenue over the season anyway - season ticketing is just money up front/in the bank - which we all know that football as a business finds irresistible & spends almost before it has hit the balance sheet!
This is the result of a poll on the CT site, not a scientific opinion poll. All it tells you is that 93.6% of those who voted wouldn't buy a season ticket. Not existing holders, not a scientific sample of CCFC fans, just those who clicked a radio button on the Coventry Telegraph website.
Poll is useful and from people i know is correct. Regular followers i know not only will not buy a season ticket but will not set foot out of the City to home games but may go to away games
What, like all the WFC fans who don't travel with their team every other saturday could have saturation football.Or as they're in the same conurbation, maybe a few thousand disgruntled Wolverhampton Wanderers fans may change allegience in protest at the appalling way their club has been run in the Boardroom.:thinking about:
This is the result of a poll on the CT site, not a scientific opinion poll. All it tells you is that 93.6% of those who voted wouldn't buy a season ticket. Not existing holders, not a scientific sample of CCFC fans, just those who clicked a radio button on the Coventry Telegraph website.
6.4 supporters...so every thousand supporters would mean only 64 would go to the game, so on a normal 10k gate we would only get 640 if we moved....BOLLOCKS, I hate polls they are misleading and tbh pointless.
There are no current season ticket holders:facepalm:
They presumably still have the details for the season just gone.
6.4 supporters...so every thousand supporters would mean only 64 would go to the game, so on a normal 10k gate we would only get 640 if we moved....BOLLOCKS, I hate polls they are misleading and tbh pointless.
It doesn't mean that, you are misunderstanding it, it says 93% of fans said they wont buy a season ticket. I don't know what percentage of regular fans don't buy a season ticket anyway but Its probably about 70%. So it's more like 30% of people willing to buy a season ticket droping to 6 or 7%. That gives you crowds of about 2.5k city fans. Which is about what I'd have guessed is likely to be honest.
Its also not as simple as that as the percentage of people who go without a season ticket is likely to increase, so that gives you more like 3k instead.
The poll needs to be read as a general barometer of opinion, not as a scientific study to determine exactly how many people are going to buy a ST. Surely everyone can understand that? And it's a pretty emphatic result, as was the one on here last week, but not really a surprise, is it?
I think it shows that the overwhelming majority will no longer support SISU, and rightly so.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?