The London LaundermatHanded over to the Chelsea charity.
Who's going to fund them?
During my nearly 20-year ownership of Chelsea FC, I have always viewed my role as a custodian of the Club, whose job it is ensuring that we are as successful as we can be today, as well as build for the future, while also playing a positive role in our communities. I have always taken decisions with the Club’s best interest at heart. I remain committed to these values. That is why I am today giving trustees of Chelsea’s charitable Foundation the stewardship and care of Chelsea FC.
I believe that currently they are in the best position to look after the interests of the Club, players, staff, and fans.
All seems a bit vague at the moment. Some reports saying this is temporary so potential this is just some legal manoeuvring to stop it being seized as an asset and / or protect his investment. There was some football finance bloke, not the usual idiot that gets basic facts about us wrong every time he posts, saying that if he stayed as owner and his assets were frozen Chelsea could potentially go out of existence very quickly.Handed over to the Chelsea charity.
Who's going to fund them?
Handed over to the Chelsea charity.
Who's going to fund them?
Just the pitch I think.I have a very cynical take on this. Doesn’t the Charity own the stadium? Hasn’t it for years refused to sell to enable development of a new stadium?
Just the p
Just the pitch I think.
Not the stadium/Stands.
Nothing against the club itself or their fans, but happy to see the back of him. Smug git who is only where he is because he was in the right place to buy the rights to the largest gas reserves in the world. Although anyone would do the same in his position, he's basically appropriated the mutual wealth of 150 million people and bought boats, hotels, some supermodels and some overpriced footballers with it.
Chelsea had been upstarts from the minute they got Hoddle, then Gullit, Vialli, Zola, Di Matteo etc - then Roman stepped in paying comedy money for flops like Torres, Mutu, Crespo, Makalele and Shevchenko. Let's hope they fade back to their rightful station - they were playing second tier whilst we were in the top flight, let's not forget.
Isn't there a rule that a minimum number of tickets have to be supplied for away fans? Lots of accounts who should no what they are talking about saying no tickets for away fans so surely they'll be in breach of PL regulations.
I don’t think PL regulations supersede UK government sanctions tbh. Even if you’re a member of the Leamington supporters club.
Also at the time wasn’t Torres one of if not the best striker in the league? The value was warrantedI was kinda with you until you called Makelele a flop!
Of course but what I mean is if a requirement of participation in the PL is that you supply x number of tickets for away supporters and Chelsea can't do that then shouldn't there be a penalty?I don’t think PL regulations supersede UK government sanctions tbh. Even if you’re a member of the Leamington supporters club.
Of course but what I mean is if a requirement of participation in the PL is that you supply x number of tickets for away supporters and Chelsea can't do that then shouldn't there be a penalty?
Ha ha ha.....ha ha. Fuck abramovic. Fuck Chelsea. Fuck all the nouveau riche clubs. Fuck the hedge funds and the leveraged buy-outs. Fuck the Premier league and fuck the champions league......
Of course but what I mean is if a requirement of participation in the PL is that you supply x number of tickets for away supporters and Chelsea can't do that then shouldn't there be a penalty?
They could give visiting fans free tickets.They can - the government won’t let them
No more private jets and fancy hotels. Ryan Air it is!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?