Agree otis. As well as we played in the 35 mins, a lot of that was down to how shockingly bad Peterborough were. It was telling that as soon as they threw on the sub and changed their system on 35 minutes we lost control of the game.
Had arnsrtrong been playing in that first 35 we'd have been 2-3 up
Agree otis. As well as we played in the 35 mins, a lot of that was down to how shockingly bad Peterborough were. It was telling that as soon as they threw on the sub and changed their system on 35 minutes we lost control of the game.
Had arnsrtrong been playing in that first 35 we'd have been 2-3 up
yep. what was just as disappointing that when Peterborough changed their system and pressed the back 4 in particular we didn't change what we were doing.
2 key issues were backing off when they ran at us and even worse was the passing in defensive areas. far too often were passes in defensive areas that were putting our players under pressure and costing us the ball. why play Fortune and bring on Henderson if you're not going to knock it long to relieve the pressure?
too often recently we seem to be want to be known as a passing side etc. rather being a practical side.