Bid £20m + £10m add ons apparetlyWolves looking at Hackney. Potentially a honking end of the season for Boro.
Bid £20m + £10m add ons apparetly
Boro having Wolves pants down at that price, never seen him any good against us tbh.Bid £20m + £10m add ons apparetly
He's a good player, even if he played badly against us.Boro having Wolves pants down at that price, never seen him any good against us tbh.
Even got sent off last year up there!!
Not rated by me buts its all about opinions, he couldn’t lace Rudoni’s boots!He's a good player, even if he played badly against us.
Play totally differnet roles to be fairNot rated by me buts its all about opinions, he couldn’t lace Rudoni’s boots!
Completely anecdotal but it feels like a lot of good players don’t play well against us and a lot of shit players have their best game of the season. Ends up with our fans massively over-rating players like Josh Bowler based off one performance 4 years ago etc.Boro having Wolves pants down at that price, never seen him any good against us tbh.
Even got sent off last year up there.
Also Hamer must be on someone betters radar !
Completely different type of playerNot rated by me buts its all about opinions, he couldn’t lace Rudoni’s boots!
Yeah, but I imagine his salary expectations now would be significantly higher, and probably at a point that would not work for us. Ie. We would never make him our highest earner, and if we did dressing room harmony could shatter.COH for 2m would be a class squad player and would be great for the dressing room
If you want better options off the bench than Lati, Collins, Allen, et al, then £2m for an O'Hare isnt a bad deal. Let's face it, we've got 1 of the better starting 11s in the league. Its as and when a player gets injured we start to look threadbare. £2m for proven cover for Rudoni is a steal. If it wasn't O'Hare, let's take that name out of the equation, and we could buy a proven, creative midfielder at this level, that scores and assists regularly, for £2m as cover for Rudoni, there isnt a single person on this forum would say its bad business.So how much should we be spending on bench players?
Would it though? We've dropped £654k a week wage by losing Binks. Surely there's a little bit extra in the wage kitty now?I think O Hares current wage demands would be what breaks the bank for us.
Makes you wonder what Rudi is worth then.Play totally differnet roles to be fair
Similar price I'd sayMakes you wonder what Rudi is worth then.
Makes you wonder what Rudi is worth then.Completely different type of player
Also talk of them selling O'Hare for £2m to Legia Warsaw
I don't think he's anything special and certainly no better than Josh Eccles!Yeah, but I imagine his salary expectations now would be significantly higher, and probably at a point that would not work for us. Ie. We would never make him our highest earner, and if we did dressing room harmony could shatter.
I agree, I wouldn’t want him. Just saying his wages would make any deal unlikely.I don't think he's anything special and certainly no better than Josh Eccles!
Not that’s realistic anyway but Hamer would instantly make us a better teamI agree, I wouldn’t want him. Just saying his wages would make any deal unlikely.
We need to look forward and not backwards, and therefore I wouldn’t want us spunking a load of cash on Hamer either, even though I absolutely loved him before.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?