Flying Fokker
Well-Known Member
SWFC start on -15 next season in L1
Why don't you report UEFA? Why haven't Spurs reported UEFA?
Why don't you report UEFA? Why haven't Spurs reported UEFA?
It is hugely illegal for any auditor to report "fanciful" numbers. I haven't looked who spurs auditors are, but I'd assume one of the big 4, it is ridiculous to suggest they would go on in misrepresenting Spurs true financials. It would not look favourable on them at all.Great reply. The only numbers UEFA report are those given to them by the clubs. These are not the fanciful numbers the clubs want you to believe but the cold hard facts. They're not allowed to give BS like many Premier clubs do.
Are you saying that UEFA have given the wrong facts when the true numbers came from Spurs. And then are you saying for some reason Spurs haven't queried what UEFA have said?It is hugely illegal for any auditor to report "fanciful" numbers. I haven't looked who spurs auditors are, but I'd assume one of the big 4, it is ridiculous to suggest they would go on in misrepresenting Spurs true financials. It would not look favourable on them at all.
Are you a qualified accountant?Are you saying that UEFA have given the wrong facts when the true numbers came from Spurs. And then are you saying for some reason Spurs haven't queried what UEFA have said?
Desperate measures even for you.
Again, are you saying UEFA are wrong after analysing the numbers? What is in it for them to call out their massive losses?Believe it or not I’m actually trying to help you by saying leave it alone. What you are saying is just embarrassing and people are laughing at you
Are those who are in charge of UEFA going to employ people more knowledgeable than yourself?Are you a qualified accountant?
OK, no youre not. Thought so.Are those who are in charge of UEFA going to employ people more knowledgeable than yourself?
They say they won't give out details, but the numbers are correct. You have read that.This is the UEFA report that the £129m figure supposedly comes from. I can find nothing in it to substantiate that claim. The figures in the UEFA report are based on the same accounts on CH.
No. I rely on those that know much more than you and I.OK, no youre not. Thought so.
I love the fact that you took the time to put the word "Hoodoo" in caps.
But in truth it's a tricky one. Games against yourselves are usually against a side somewhere around us in the table, so tend to have more riding on them? So the fallout is probably more in terms of effects. This you would imagine would make us think of it as worse.
But I'm going to have to go Bristol City in general. As you've generally at least been a good side since the hoodoo began, not the cannon fodder saved for a "Typical Boro." Aside from their level for one match towards the back end of last season, Bristol City have been everywhere between middling and a complete bag of shit.
With most games against yourselves too, you usually perform out of your boots and have your best game of the season more often, so at least we can say you performed spectacularly on the day, so it took a real effort to beat us. Bristol City on the other hand have had the one of those I can recall, the others they have far more often been jammy as hell or just shithoused the match, kicking lumps out of players (while the ref seems to be doing his best impression of Mr Magoo) parking the bus all game.
We hit every upright and the bar a few times, they suddenly appear to have developed a time machine to stick Gordon Banks between the sticks, then hitting about two long balls to Riis who, instead of the usual carthorse he is for the other 44 games of the season, suddenly morphs into the John Arne version from Liverpool's past and hits an unstoppable effort into our net. Then cue more shithousery than a prison toilet block and more time wasting than Burnley last season until the final whistle blows, probably early, but let's face it we could have stayed out there until midnight and the result would be the same.
So Bristol City tend to shade it, just for the sheer frustration and knowledge that not only would another 4 nil to us have been the most fair score, but that Riis and the GK will return to being an utter pile of wank up in their very next game, which can sometimes be against a side around us we could do with them taking points off.
Out of interest, when did your games against us go from an annoying few results to a full blown hoodoo?I love the fact that you took the time to put the word "Hoodoo" in caps.
But in truth it's a tricky one. Games against yourselves are usually against a side somewhere around us in the table, so tend to have more riding on them? So the fallout is probably more in terms of effects. This you would imagine would make us think of it as worse.
But I'm going to have to go Bristol City in general. As you've generally at least been a good side since the hoodoo began, not the cannon fodder saved for a "Typical Boro." Aside from their level for one match towards the back end of last season, Bristol City have been everywhere between middling and a complete bag of shit.
With most games against yourselves too, you usually perform out of your boots and have your best game of the season more often, so at least we can say you performed spectacularly on the day, so it took a real effort to beat us. Bristol City on the other hand have had the one of those I can recall, the others they have far more often been jammy as hell or just shithoused the match, kicking lumps out of players (while the ref seems to be doing his best impression of Mr Magoo) parking the bus all game.
We hit every upright and the bar a few times, they suddenly appear to have developed a time machine to stick Gordon Banks between the sticks, then hitting about two long balls to Riis who, instead of the usual carthorse he is for the other 44 games of the season, suddenly morphs into the John Arne version from Liverpool's past and hits an unstoppable effort into our net. Then cue more shithousery than a prison toilet block and more time wasting than Burnley last season until the final whistle blows, probably early, but let's face it we could have stayed out there until midnight and the result would be the same.
So Bristol City tend to shade it, just for the sheer frustration and knowledge that not only would another 4 nil to us have been the most fair score, but that they'll return to being an utter pile of wank up front and in goal in their very next game, which can sometimes be against a side around us we could do with them taking points off.
I suggest you will be reporting Mr Kevin Thompson who was the Partner on Tottenhams audit for signing off on accounts that are not truly representative of their situation.No. I rely on those that know much more than you and I.
Each match ticket is now over £70. They haven't spent it because they haven't got it.I can't imagine spurs are in any financial danger (before any potential relegation)
New stadium prints money doesn't it? They haven't spent as much on squad as rivals either?
They spent £260m!Each match ticket is now over £70. They haven't spent it because they haven't got it.
All anyone has to do is a Google search to see how bad things have got. They're not in a relegation battle for no reason.
They are not in a relegation fight due to squad qualityEach match ticket is now over £70. They haven't spent it because they haven't got it.
All anyone has to do is a Google search to see how bad things have got. They're not in a relegation battle for no reason.
No. I rely on those that know much more than you and I.
Wow, thats fucking harsh compared to what Leicester got away with.SWFC start on -15 next season in L1
This is the UEFA report that the £129m figure supposedly comes from. I can find nothing in it to substantiate that claim. The figures in the UEFA report are based on the same accounts on CH.
Their wage bill is more than £260m a year. Are you finally going to admit the truth of their losses?They spent £260m!
The situation there was bizarre, either someone has to pay Chansiri £15m or they start on -15?Wow, thats fucking harsh compared to what Leicester got away with.
I hope it doesn't impact their take over plans.
Good old Astute, he's nothing if not consistent99% of arguments on this forum boil down to one person refusing to admit they’re wrong and dragging it out over 4 pages
99% of arguments on this forum boil down to one person refusing to admit they’re wrong and dragging it out over 4 pages
It's not that they have to pay Chansiri as such, it's that the EFL rules require at least a 25p in the £ settlement for non football creditors is not being met. His debt is £60m.The situation there was bizarre, either someone has to pay Chansiri £15m or they start on -15?
You’d think the EFL could judge that one differently.
And then when covcity4life is proven right they cry that I'm point scoring and they were understandably wrong due to emotion99% of arguments on this forum boil down to one person refusing to admit they’re wrong and dragging it out over 4 pages
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?