no I didn't, I said we should wait until the play a better teamYou’re the one who got onto me for saying they had great players
Absolutely honkingThat front 3 at derby is pretty tragic View attachment 37655
You are talking about me ,what "bile" have I posted?Usual suspect posting his cowardly bile behind his anonymous internet face.
Mendez-Laing has been on the sauce with Gus. Chilli sauce, perhaps garlicAbsolutely honking
Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
both from the looks of itMendez-Laing has been on the sauce with Gus. Chilli sauce, perhaps garlic
Hoping that the £60m Wolves have just taken off Chelsea will be used to fund their interest in Hamer.On Hamer, his goal was a gift but typically eye catching. Hopefully a little nudge to anyone considering triggering that clause.
Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
Bournemouth about to get the same for big Dom Solanke.Hoping that the £60m Wolves have just taken off Chelsea will be used to fund their interest in Hamer.
There's a tiki bar just like Samoan Joes on Fulham Road a couple of minutes walk from Stamford Bridge.Hoping that the £60m Wolves have just taken off Chelsea will be used to fund their interest in Hamer.
That line-up is an absolute mess tbf, think it’s got at least 5 players in the wrong positionThat front 3 at derby is pretty tragic View attachment 37655
Horrible watch but can be effectiveBecause he’s shite. Wouldn’t have him here
In your last 10 posts 3 have involved you calling someone a "prick" or a "knob".You are talking about me ,what "bile" have I posted?
I have just had a differing view on a football team and I got abused for it
So please tell me what "bile" I have posted?
after I was abused for having a differing view on a football team so as far as most people are referring to sparks as 2 things he was actually being does not count as bileIn your last 10 posts 3 have involved you calling someone a "prick" or a "knob".
Please correct me if I'm wrong but that qualifies as bile as far as I'm çoncerned
You are the one that started the name calling first. You are the worst on the forum for itafter I was abused for having a differing view on a football team so as far as most people are referring to sparks as 2 things he was actually being does not count as bile
sparks decided to abuse me so I sorry you are wrong and you probably owe me an apology
In fact the first person who was abusive was sparks so why are you not talking about sparks and his "bile"?In your last 10 posts 3 have involved you calling someone a "prick" or a "knob".
Please correct me if I'm wrong but that qualifies as bile as far as I'm çoncerned
So that's your defense for abusing people ? Lol.after I was abused for having a differing view on a football team so as far as most people are referring to sparks as 2 things he was actually being does not count as bile
sparks decided to abuse me so I sorry you are wrong and you probably owe me an apology
no I didn't you called me a knob first, the whole "at least Evo realised he was being a knob" is just you calling me a knobYou are the one that started the name calling first. You are the worst on the forum for it
No it wasn’t, you are paranoid. It had nothing to do with you and you inserted yourself into the conversationno I didn't you called me a knob first, the whole "at least Evo realised he was being a knob" is just you calling me a knob
no, it's me asking you why you have had a go at me when it was sparks that got abusive first?So that's your defense for abusing people ? Lol.
ok fella, you are lying but crack on.No it wasn’t, you are paranoid. It had nothing to do with you and you inserted yourself into the conversation
Even city would have won at Deepdale tonight , that I'm sure
Thanks for telling me what I’m thinking David.ok fella, you are lying but crack on.
yeah, there's a reason the release clause is such common knowledge. he wants it to beNot sure why people are fretting over whether Hamer will move. Everyone needs to ask themselves a) why there is a relegation clause in his contract and b) why we know there is a relegation clause in his contract. Provided someone out there thinks he is worth £16/17m he is gone. Unless he gets injured I'd be pretty confident he will move. The issue will be he will give them ~£15m to reinvest and as we saw last season that can go a long way in this division.
Again I'm specifically referring to you. You're like a child claiming "he did it first" . What's your adult defence ?no, it's me asking you why you have had a go at me when it was sparks that got abusive first?
oh well
Again i was asking why you have decided to attack me but are okay with the person who started the abuseAgain I'm specifically referring to you. You're like a child claiming "he did it first" . What's your adult defence ?
Oh well.
Again I'm specifically referring to you. You're like a child claiming "he did it first" . What's your adult defence ?no, it's me asking you why you have had a go at me when it was sparks that got abusive first?
oh well
I don't need to DM you as you've already publicly abused someone. It's not personal just an observation from an outsider looking in. Where is the evidence of "an attack" or " having a pop " as opposed to a statement of fact that you've been abusive to another poster ?Again i was asking why you have decided to attack me but are okay with the person who started the abuse
I am not defending myself as frankly I don't have to, not to someone on a forum.
It's not a good look and frankly weird as I'm not sure who you are and why you have decided to have a go at me incorrectly.
oh well, so be it
but please if you want to have a pop at me for some unknown reason then DM me as this isn't the place
He thinks his shit doesn’t stink, yet he is the most argumentative know all on the site.Again I'm specifically referring to you. You're like a child claiming "he did it first" . What's your adult defence ?
O
I don't need to DM you as you've already publicly abused someone. It's not personal just an observation from an outsider looking in. Where is the evidence of "an attack" or " having a pop " as opposed to a statement of fact that you've been abusive to another poster ?
Oh well , so be it if you cannot accept this unbiased observation.
it's not unbiased is it, oh well you can't answer the questionAgain I'm specifically referring to you. You're like a child claiming "he did it first" . What's your adult defence ?
O
I don't need to DM you as you've already publicly abused someone. It's not personal just an observation from an outsider looking in. Where is the evidence of "an attack" or " having a pop " as opposed to a statement of fact that you've been abusive to another poster ?
Oh well , so be it if you cannot accept this unbiased observation.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?