SameThought I'd get a season off from trying not to check other results and looking at the table all the time. Thanks, Bling.
it was a long throw wasn't it? then it hit norwich defender who headed it on to the back of his teammate and then it went to the goal scorerIrrelevant. It was offside at the point it bounced off the back of the #20. A rebound or deflection does not play you onside; it’s only onside if a defender deliberately plays the ball.
it was a long throw wasn't it? then it hit norwich defender who headed it on to the back of his teammate and then it went to the goal scorer
you can't be offside from a throw so unless i missed something where is the oxford touch to make it offside?
i did and it was nonsense as it's the norwich number 3 that heads it against the number 20Read what I said above, I’m not sure how else to explain it. As soon as it hit #20 on the back and bounced through to the striker it is offside, as #20 clearly didn’t deliberately play it. It was a rebound and thus offside (as clearly defined in the Offside law).
Re your point on the long throw, the throw ends the first time the ball is played by the Oxford player (#33 I think) so that is also not relevant. If the throw had gone straight to the striker (which it didn’t) it would obviously not have been offside.
Yes such inconstancy causes the abuse of of officials or should I say anxiety on the terraces.Last weeks ref And many of them just blow up on the time given whatever happens
the only oxford player near the ball is the 47 and he doesn't touch it so the only 2 oxford players who touch it are the throw in taker and the scorerRead what I said above, I’m not sure how else to explain it. As soon as it hit #20 on the back and bounced through to the striker it is offside, as #20 clearly didn’t deliberately play it. It was a rebound and thus offside (as clearly defined in the Offside law).
Re your point on the long throw, the throw ends the first time the ball is played by the Oxford player (#33 I think) so that is also not relevant. If the throw had gone straight to the striker (which it didn’t) it would obviously not have been offside.
it can't as he as he is wrong and the video is in this threadThis could run and run,, What's Pete's interpretation??
The Brazilian is close. Just a few hairs breadth in it.View attachment 41890
Found it i think. Absolutely no chance the MLS is better, in fact i'd make an argument for being around 6th, although admittedly i know little about the Brazilian league.
the only oxford player near the ball is the 47 and he doesn't touch it so the only 2 oxford players who touch it are the throw in taker and the scorer
i have posted the video if you want to watch it against and refresh your memory
the only oxford player near the ball is the 47 and he doesn't touch it so the only 2 oxford players who touch it are the throw in taker and the scorer
i have posted the video if you want to watch it against and refresh your memory
ffsThe scorer is in an offside position the whole time, so is offside. Why do you think he is onside when he is clearly in an offside position throughout?
I don’t need to see the video again as I’ve watched it 10 times in slow motion on Sky as I couldn’t believe it had been allowed.
ffs
you can not be offside from a throw
no other oxford player touches the ball
the norwich number 3 plays the ball on purpose creating a new phase of play
it hits the back of the norwich 20 and falls to the striker
it's onside, no one else including norwich think it was offside but crack on mate
that would be great if an oxford player touched the ball, please note the word team mateThe relevant section from Law 11 as you don’t seem to believe it
2. Offside offence
A player in an offside position at the moment the ball is played or touched* by a team-mate is only penalised on becoming involved in active play by:
gaining an advantage by playing the ball or interfering with an opponent when it has:
rebounded or been deflected off the goalpost, crossbar or an opponent
He hasn’t received the ball from a throw so that is absolutely irrelevant. He has received it an offside position from a rebound so is offside.
Not as simple as that.He hasn’t received the ball from a throw so that is absolutely irrelevant. He has received it an offside position from a rebound so is offside.
The Norwich defender heads it against his own man, sending it back towards the goalscorer.The relevant section from Law 11 as you don’t seem to believe it
2. Offside offence
A player in an offside position at the moment the ball is played or touched* by a team-mate is only penalised on becoming involved in active play by:
gaining an advantage by playing the ball or interfering with an opponent when it has:
rebounded or been deflected off the goalpost, crossbar or an opponent
i've posted a video showing him thatThe Norwich defender heads it against his own man, sending it back towards the goalscorer.
No Oxford player touches the ball from the throw but the scorer. A Norwich man plays it to him. It's onside.
that would be great if an oxford player touched the ball, please note the word team mate
as we have established you can not be offside from a throw in so another oxford player would need to be the "team mate" who touches or plays the ball
that doesn't matter though as the norwich number 3 heads the ball out on purpose creating a new phase of play
Even if he's in an offside position, the ball's played to him by an opponent, not a team-mate, so he's not offside.We’re not going to agree on this as you clearly don’t understand the concept of the throw ending the minute it touches another player (it does not have to be a team mate), so you continually saying “can’t be offside from a throw in” is a red herring.
The Norwich defender heads it against his own man, sending it back towards the goalscorer.
No Oxford player touches the ball from the throw but the scorer. A Norwich man plays it to him. It's onside.
Offside without what could be seen as a pass to a team mate. If the last Norwich player to touch it was the GK deemed to have made a save it would also have counted as offside.Even if he's in an offside position, the ball's played to him by an opponent, not a team-mate, so he's not offside.
No Oxford player touches the ball to make him offside.
Same
can't be offside from a throw inIrrelevant. It was offside at the point it bounced off the back of the #20. A rebound or deflection does not play you onside; it’s only onside if a defender deliberately plays the ball.
Hmm. I concede this. I think you're right, but it's a strange one if no attacking player has played the ball. You'd think the deflection clause is written with a deflection from an attacking pass in mind.Another one who doesn’t understand the offside law.
It rebounds off #20 (he doesn’t deliberately play it) so cannot be playing the striker onside. It is only played on if it is deliberate.
So if we all accept that the striker is standing in an offside position, he is not played on, and is thus offside.
You might want to educate yourselves from Law 11 in the FA handbook.
it rebounds off the 20 after the norwich player heads it clearAnother one who doesn’t understand the offside law.
It rebounds off #20 (he doesn’t deliberately play it) so cannot be playing the striker onside. It is only played on if it is deliberate.
So if we all accept that the striker is standing in an offside position, he is not played on, and is thus offside.
You might want to educate yourselves from Law 11 in the FA handbook.
you can't also be offside if a defender tries to head it clear and heads it into the back of his own playercan't be offside from a throw in
Another one who doesn’t understand the offside law.
It rebounds off #20 (he doesn’t deliberately play it) so cannot be playing the striker onside. It is only played on if it is deliberate.
So if we all accept that the striker is standing in an offside position, he is not played on, and is thus offside.
You might want to educate yourselves from Law 11 in the FA handbook.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?