Championship 2011 stats (1 Viewer)

I'm surprised we'd won as many as 6 actually.


6 wins out of 35 games and an ever depleting squad and yet still people on here predict wins and us scoring 3 goals etc.

Time to wake up and smell the coffee.

never mind the coffee with them stats i need a stiff one

Thorn out!

The stats do indeed paint a very very worrying picture and the reality becomes even more apparant when extrapolating the results against a projected 46 game season.

6 wins and 14 draws represents 32 points out of a possible 105 - when apportioned against a 46 game (138 point max possible points) that theoretic season would yield just 42 points.

And then when looking back comparing 42 points to the last ten seasons relegation teams the alarm bells and supporter's nerves must start jangling big time:

Season - Points Relegated:
10/11 - 42
09/10 - 47
08/09 - 46
07/08 - 52
06/07 - 42
05/06 - 42
04/05 - 50
03/04 - 51
02/03 - 46
01/02 - 49

As you all can see 42 points would have guaranteed relegation in each of those seasons which surely is where we are heading if the stats don't lie.

PUSB

I think the January transfer window will be key to any team looking to avoid relegation or gain promotion from the championship.

In other words, we'll be going down unless Millwall, Bristol City & Watford don't sign anyone.

skybluesteve76 said:

Thorn out!

Click to expand...

That's Boothroyd's results as well.

Wiki says thorn has up until 22 Oct

PL 22 won 5 drew 9 lost 8 points 24, estimated seasons points 50

That means in that 2011 run that bothroyd managed

PL 13 won 1 drew 5 lost 7 points 8 est seasons points 28

Season's ebb and flow so stats only show part of the picture. However it does show what an awful run we were on with Boothroyd.

It doesn't seem to matter what manager/chairman/board we have apart from one Micky Adams season the points accumulation is always about the same year in year out - CRAP.

PUSB

What depressing stats!

skybluesteve76 said:

Thorn out!

Click to expand...

Hi Steve, do you really think that AT is responsible for this run of form???:facepalm: