Cov City Daytrader 87
Well-Known Member
Replace the word thick with stubborn is probably the correct use.
Bite their hand off you thick fucking twat.:jerkit::jerkit:
Replace the word thick with stubborn is probably the correct use.
If this club ever found its way into the PL it would do so every week.
If this club ever found its way into the PL it would do so every week.
Sorry Brighton...no chance. We would fill it 5-6 times a season - Man U, man c, Liverpool, Chelsea, arsenal and probably the villa.
If a picture paints a thousand words then why can't I paint you? Telly Savalas had it bang on. If.
He aint a local though wingy,thats why he continues to back sisu. If they moved the club to rugby,leam or nuneaton it wouldn't matter to him,he'll never understand how us coventrians feel about an out of town hedge fund basically taking the piss out of us.
It's a good job us non locals turn up though, isn't it? You wouldn't even get into four figures without us.
Its a good job us Coventry taxpayers paid for a stadium though isnt it?
Or plain foolish.
SISU shown up to be a bunch of vile scumbags shocker..................so with concessions like that turned down, what is their cunning plan?........You can have sympathy with those fans who refuse to go until these cretins have gone, irrespective of the state they will leave the club in. I think they really thought they could drive ACL to the wall.:jerkit:
Would guess TF got caught on the hop by these details coming out.
Lets be honest ACL have made a very reasonable offer - a final offer by the looks - which CCFC have turned down.
btw £400k no longer us the highest rent payers in L1 - want proof just ask a Walsall supporter today.
Real question is do TF and SISU really want to do a deal .......... or is there another motive to this:thinking about:
Its a good job us Coventry taxpayers paid for a stadium though isnt it?
Lets hope they do as all of us I am sure are only interested in the clubs expenditure being as low as possible.
Actually of they negotiate a huge rent reduction that will be excellent news. The fact that ACL after relatively modest action have already agreed such a reduction tells you something.
There cunning plan by the way will be to stall even more and hope to get further concessions.
Lets hope they do as all of us I am sure are only interested in the clubs expenditure being as low as possible.
Sorry KD but if you think they're getting any more off you've took a wrong un ,there will be no more concession.
I'm led to believe, that ACL also wanted the rent owed from when they stoped paying with 50% of match day revenue. SISU want 200k rent, 100% match day revenue and the rent be backdated to when they stop paying.
Pushing for a bargain SISU are, it'll probably end up somewhere in the middle :thinking about:
Fisher's argument will be the rent is still double what L1 teams play and higher than all Championship teams pay.
I live in walsall and they pay around 400,000 a year to rent the stadium with is a dive. I think SISU have turned down the offer because they can't afford it :s worrying times
But less than what Walsall pay.
is the rent reduction retrospective? I'd expect some of the £1.1m to be written off, maybe even 67% of it
think that's a key point, they aren't going to accept any deal that doesn't backdate any new rent agreed. Also this deal talks about 3 years, what happens after that?
if ACL are in as healthy a position as they keep claiming they should be able to offer a drop to £200K and backdate that. Maybe add in a one off payment or rise in rent should we ever get into the premiership. Did see the "putting at risk the Ricoh project for jobs and leisure development around the stadium" comment, how can the project as a whole and jobs etc be at risk if ACL is doing as well as they claim and don't need CCFC?
is the rent reduction retrospective? I'd expect some of the £1.1m to be written off, maybe even 67% of it
think that's a key point, they aren't going to accept any deal that doesn't backdate any new rent agreed.
The club may have turned down the offer if ACL insist the new rent is only valid from the day of agreement and not calculated back to the day the club stopped paying. It may not be a question about a few throusand pounds per months, but £1m+ here and now (or even future installments).
But less than what Walsall pay.
Yes - like somebody wrote yesterday:
I hadn't read the whole thread
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?