In the last couple of weeks, I started to question if I was in the minority, with my view that AT is a good manager and the main reason for relegation is the owners.
It seems 51 % think the owners are to blame for relegation.
39 % it is a combo of owners, AT, board, players
2% AT
Is AT the right man to lead cov back to championship
62% yes 38% no.
Two Biggest reasons for relegation
lack of signings 41 %
Loss of big name players 39%
Wrong tactics 4 %
Sorry for my ignorance but where was this survey?
No idea how many replied. They advertised it for about 6 weeks I put a link on here for it, encouraging people to take it.
They announced the results over two pages in the CET today.
You could email them to see how many people replied.
http://m.coventrytelegraph.net/ms/p...2w/view.m?id=4608735&tid=638956&cat=CCFC_News
Sorry, Duffy 46% of those who replied had a season ticket.
A small sample I would suspect - also anyone could reply - including those who do not go - it's not relevant.
thats the sought of post i would expect from you so nobody else's oppinion matters and facts ignored.
What they said they did you mean? Also the questions are ambiguous and my take on it is that 4 out of 10 say Thorn is a factor in our relegation. Only 4% tactics I assume means you cannot say lack of signings and tactics? It's poorly constructed.
So so far you have said, most the people completing it would not have gone to the matches.
Yet 46 % say they are season ticket holders.
Then you say that they have lied about this, why would they feel the need to lie that they are a season ticket holder.
Then you say that you could not chose lack of signings and tactics.
Yes you could and only 4 % included tactics.
Anything else? Or do you fancy just taking it on the chin. This survey shows the majority who took this survey still have faith in AT and that tactical errors were not a significant factor causing our relegation.
I have never posted yawn.
I have just recently posted the two ways the argument pans out and ends in dead lock.
It was just nice to know it seems the majority still have faith in him.
This is AT we are talking about and not micky Adams or AB.The yawn was aimed at Sky Blue John. He's always tired. He keeps falling asleep watching thorns mind numbing tactics and the dullest football known to man.
Basically 51 % thought if the owners had not sold the best players or actually replaced them sufficiently AT would have kept us up.
Majority of Coventry City fans are idiots shocker?
http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/co...fc-survey-2008-09-the-results-92746-24202608/
Considering that was from 5th October 2010 would you say you will try and use anything you can to make your views look right or would you count yourself as one of the majority you mentioned? ;-)
I was in the minority then, and proved correct.
Seems in minority now, and...?[/QUOTE
What you and KD were the two who thought shouold have sold gunner after his first season??
I was in the minority then, and proved correct.
Seems in minority now, and...?[/QUOTE
What you and KD were the two who thought shouold have sold gunner after his first season??
Naughty. The funniest thing I ever heard on a phone in was when someone said Andrew Whing would be sold for £5 million and play for England. I always wondered Wingy who said that..
I was in the minority then, and proved correct.
Seems in minority now, and...?
If you had the paper in front of you with the full results, you would really be struggling to try and make a case against him.
Now i know my username is similar and i did'nt mind the lad but I thought Adams ruined him ,but alas twas not me on the phone in.Naughty. The funniest thing I ever heard on a phone in was when someone said Andrew Whing would be sold for £5 million and play for England. I always wondered Wingy who said that..
I'd need to put the paper on my head. Here is a case against him;
- worst record since 1917
- Relegation
Case for him
A survey in the CET.
Right.
SO at that point Jul 21 2009
Am I correct when the survey was taken the club had sold Scott Dann.
The club still had Westwood, Gunnar and Danny Fox.
What was your view in July 2009 exqactly 3 years ago, at that time that meant you were in the minority?
That Sisu didn't really have any money, that the sales of Dann and Fox were down to this, and not the "heads turned" line spouted by Sisu, that Coleman was a dreadful manager, and was only getting worse, that within a few years we would be relegated.
Despite alll the "Sisu saved us", "Ray is a hard-headed busness and football man", and laughably, "Coleman is the best manager ouside the Premiership" stuff that was spouted by a very high percentage of fans.
I think by the looks of it Cov may have still had Fox when the survey was taken.
When did you realise that SISU were skint then. Literally after they sold Dann. Or were you dubious abbout them from the moment they came in?
Personally I was not happy when SISU came in as we did not know who they were.
When Fox, Dann, Westwood, Gunnar were signed they won me over as I thought they knew the only way they could make money would be get back into the prem. Then either sell the club or follow the West Brom route of yo yo ing for a couple of seasons. Till you build up sufficient money.
Once Dann and Fox went I realised they had given up on the dream and we were screwed.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?