Is TF not chief executive? Generally CEOs have power to make these kind of decisions themselves. That is why they are paid so much.
Is TF not chief executive? Generally CEOs have power to make these kind of decisions themselves. That is why they are paid so much.
If that were true we wouldn't have hand shake gate and we never would have left the Ricoh or had the JR. TF may be the head but JS is the neck and she can turn the head whichever way she likes.
If she did back this proposal, regardless of if her name was added as a human error or not there would have been no need to ammend it on the clubs web site. Surely?
A CEO operates freely within the objectives set by the shareholders.
Something very important happened in January 2013 that changed the game and the objectives had to change as well.
The deal TF agreed was actually a deal proposed in late 2012 by JS when they still believed the club would obtain part ownership of the club. The bail out and the hostile public comments changed everything and I can understand why the owners had to rethink the situation.
Really?
A CEO operates freely within the objectives set by the shareholders.
Something very important happened in January 2013 that changed the game and the objectives had to change as well.
The deal TF agreed was actually a deal proposed in late 2012 by JS when they still believed the club would obtain part ownership of the club. The bail out and the hostile public comments changed everything and I can understand why the owners had to rethink the situation.
So why don't ACL call them out and agree to discuss the offer?
Not in Jan/feb last year apparently.
And other point Mark. ACL won't contact sisu until the 2 criteria have been met and so far neither has. Simple surely.
Maybe they will maybe they won't but are you and Godiva happy to take that chance ?
Personally think ACLs stance is a little unreasonable as I have explained before. They can make an agreement pending receipt of monies owed. I personally see asking someone to drop an appeal verging on blackmail. I don't believe Sisu will win or that they are in the right in any way but being able to appeal a courts decision is a basic civil liberty in this country.
This is the worthless part she was willing to make a £2M donation to Higgs for because she's a good Christian? Didn't a Judge laugh at that? Hasn't it been exposed that there was never any real hunger to buy the Higgs share? That being the case how could Joy have thought the club would obtain part ownership if they never had the hunger to complete the deal? The judges words, not mine.
Maybe they will maybe they won't but are you and Godiva happy to take that chance ?
Maybe they will maybe they won't but are you and Godiva happy to take that chance ?
Maybe the judge got it wrong? It does happen, you know. His remarks were opinions, not quotes of the laws.
Let's wait until the appeals have been exhausted before we take a decision as gospel.
In the end the winner writes the history.
Which Judge? The one in the Higgs case or the one that overseen the JR? Maybe both?
Do you not think it's more likely that SISU are wrong.
I'm exhausted by the appeals already and they haven't even started.
Why wouldn't I be happy if ACL invites the club to discuss the offer?
Is that relevant today? Is it relevant to a temporary rent deal? Is it relevant to the JR appeal (where a European Court may look more strictly at the legislation)?Not the same judge in both no. Wasn't it leggatt and higgenbottom?
Thing is though Godiva it's all Sisu's fault they moved out and they offered as tony says 2m and it was laughed out of court. It was sisu who started playing funny buggers not ACL.
It's common knowledge Higgs wanted or want out. 2million was derisory and rightly laughed out of court.
Maybe the judge got it wrong? It does happen, you know. His remarks were opinions, not quotes of the laws.
Let's wait until the appeals have been exhausted before we take a decision as gospel.
In the end the winner writes the history.
Your stance was that you want Sisu to continue with the JR.
My question was are you happy with that decision if it means that Acl don't get round the table and begin negotiations ?
Lol !!
So your saying the judge made his decision based on opinion not law ?
If ACL decide they won't allow the club home on a short term deal because sisu won't drop the appeal, then I will blame ACL.
Absolutely.
It's blackmail and an attempt to obstruct the legal system where appeals is an important part.
If ACL decide they won't allow the club home on a short term deal because sisu won't drop the appeal, then I will blame ACL.
Absolutely.
It's blackmail and an attempt to obstruct the legal system where appeals is an important part.
I will try and take you to court for over a year and then I get battered in court and I still insist on appealing against you and see if you do a deal with me?
Is this for real? You're saying businesses should do deals with people who take them through stressful and costly court hearings. For real?
If ACL decide they won't allow the club home on a short term deal because sisu won't drop the appeal, then I will blame ACL.
Absolutely.
It's blackmail and an attempt to obstruct the legal system where appeals is an important part.
It's common knowledge Higgs wanted or want out. 2million was derisory and rightly laughed out of court.
No business in the world would deal with a company that is constantly trying to sue them !!
I don't know why CCC don't buy out Higgs and own it all themselves to be honest.
Though they thought that the "derisory" offer was more than it was worth I think from some of the documents during the Higgs case.
I will try and take you to court for over a year and then I get battered in court and I still insist on appealing against you and see if you do a deal with me?
Is this for real? You're saying businesses should do deals with people who take them through stressful and costly court hearings. For real?
They're not suing anybodyApparently it's fine and won't stop a deal john. I can't believe what I read sometimes.
Hey I'm suing you for millions but can we still do a deal in the short term? Lol
They're not suing anybody
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?