Basically those who believe the council done wrong don't believe in state aid unless its for sisus benefit.
i'm still trying to work out what is state aid.
for instance the state sends aid to the 3rd world all the time in form of money, medicines, tents etc and to the best off my knowlege there is no bill to be paid by these countries and there is no added interest. so if the state lends money to a business and the business is going to pay this money back with interest, how can be classified as aid?
i'm sure grendull has an explination though
My understanding is there is two aspects that sisu have claimed.
They claim public money has been used to undermine their business plan.
They also claim the loan the council made to acl wouldn't have been made by a commercial lender as they claim acl doesn't have the capital to warrant it.
I think that's it anyway.
My understanding is there is two aspects that sisu have claimed.
They claim public money has been used to undermine their business plan.
They also claim the loan the council made to acl wouldn't have been made by a commercial lender as they claim acl doesn't have the capital to warrant it.
I think that's it anyway.
Again, if there's an issue with the Ricoh situation, I cannot see why this is significantly different:
http://www.northamptonchron.co.uk/n...strike-12m-deal-to-expand-sixfields-1-5245529
As SISU complained about state-assistance within the previous ground they were a tenant of; I cannot see how they would equally not concern themselves with the arrangements pertaining to the new stadium they have taken tenancy of.
Unless they're not bothered about state-aid at all, and have a subplot I couldn't possibly figure out; of course...... :thinking about:
Ah, that's where it was worth following some of the links. If only one professional sports club is a tenant then it is more likely to be state aid than if there are two such clubs.
Is there another sub plot here that sees CCFC being used as the second club, by Northampton council and Cardoza, and thus avoiding the state aid rules?
Ah, that's where it was worth following some of the links. If only one professional sports club is a tenant then it is more likely to be state aid than if there are two such clubs.
Is there another sub plot here that sees CCFC being used as the second club, by Northampton council and Cardoza, and thus avoiding the state aid rules?
The Ladies team also play at the Ricoh. Despite the name they are classed as a separate club.
Don't they usually play in bedworth?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?