It means that as it stands the process for striking off CCFC H (the original CCFC company) has been suspended/stopped for the time being KoK - but no real idea why
How does it relate to that Simon? The Charity were suing SISU not CCFC H so would I assume not be affected by CCFCH being struck off. If it does relate to that dispute does that imply that SISU or a related person/party have issued an objection because unless they did a large part of the counter claim would be struck out?
What about the money for Alan Higgs Centre maintenance, did that get paid up as part of making new academy deal?
My understanding is that it's related to this court action http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/coventry-city-owners-court-battle-6519080
It means that as it stands the process for striking off CCFC H (the original CCFC company) has been suspended/stopped for the time being KoK - but no real idea why
How does it relate to that Simon? The Charity were suing SISU not CCFC H so would I assume not be affected by CCFCH being struck off. If it does relate to that dispute does that imply that SISU or a related person/party have issued an objection because unless they did a large part of the counter claim would be struck out? Any more details you can give?
OSB58 - Is there a chance the objection could have anything to do with *alleged* asset stripping?
have no idea ....... my best bet would be HMRC but Simon seems to think it is to do with the Higgs Charity vs SISU case. Cant see why or what grounds the Charity or AHCT or ACL would object though so very much doubt they have
To find something you have to be looking. Assuming that you are talking about the administrator why should he start looking now? He doesn't have a good track record in this respect.Any chance he's found something?
To find something you have to be looking. Assuming that you are talking about the administrator why should he start looking now? He doesn't have a good track record in this respect.
Is it Appleton doing the liquidation?
If not there could be things found that are not right. After all how long did it take Appleton to find where the golden share was. He missed players registered to the wrong section of the club. Who knows what else he missed.
Is it Appleton doing the liquidation?
If not there could be things found that are not right. After all how long did it take Appleton to find where the golden share was. He missed players registered to the wrong section of the club. Who knows what else he missed.
Is it Appleton doing the liquidation?
If not there could be things found that are not right. After all how long did it take Appleton to find where the golden share was. He missed players registered to the wrong section of the club. Who knows what else he missed.
That's a serious accusation - I hope you have some evidence.
Which part is wrong? You are supposed to have a good memory.
And Samo, how do you know he never missed anything? How do you know that nothing was hidden from him by anyone? And what do you mean by he only found what he needed to?
Astute, I would not wish to end up with a solicitors letter so I will be careful with my wording. Some may look harder than others depending on their motivation and allegiance. Does that describe my meaning?
That's a serious accusation - I hope you have some evidence.
Astute, I would not wish to end up with a solicitors letter so I will be careful with my wording. Some may look harder than others depending on their motivation and allegiance. Does that describe my meaning?
oldskyblue58; Could we as fans have objected? we would have needed to be creditor of CCFC H or establish a claim first said:i think all fans are creditors, the amount of money and time we have investeded in this club and got feck all back but dissapointment and pain!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?