Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • General Discussion
  • Off Topic Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Care homes (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter Otis
  • Start date Aug 17, 2023
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 14, 2023
  • #36
Flying Fokker said:
500K is a lot of money. That is about 10 years worth of care. There’s a fair chance there would be a bob or two left for inheritors without the 500k bottom limit. That’s where the system fails. Many start with far less and there is little to pass on/ the state picks up the tab earlier. The real hope is that all the elderly receive appropriate levels of care…thus overriding the intention of passing money . My MIL has dementia, they’d have loved to leave a nest egg and thinks she will be doing so, but our priority is her care.
Click to expand...
I agree, but I'm including that as total assets. If you want to pass on a house then that probably takes up a fair chunk.

TBH I did just pick a nice round figure at random. I've not done some in depth analysis on what it should be.
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 14, 2023
  • #37
Deleted member 5849 said:
If we want people to have care then we need our wealth syphoned off by local authorities.

Of course the fairer way would be to tax everyone more for it, or bump inheritance tax up, so we all pay for one another.

That seems to be an alien concept nowadays however.

Anyway, just remembered what this thread actually started as, so perhaps it's time I bow out as my advice is becoming more polemic, and less useful as a result
Click to expand...
I still think that money gained from inheritance should be classified as income and paid by the person receiving.

It then offers the opportunity to drip feed it via a trust etc and thus last longer and potentially help more of your descendants for longer, but also potentially takes a huge chunk for those with large fortunes that pass it on all at once (provided you could shut the numerous loopholes they use to avoid it)
 
Reactions: Flying Fokker
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • General Discussion
  • Off Topic Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?