Simms has to start. We need to play quick counter attacking football. Cheeky 2 - 0 away win if we do.
I'd rest Sakamoto for this one, move Bassett out wide and bring Simms in. I'd even consider putting Lati right back and use Kitching to partner Thomas.
Midfield need to move more than they did against Millwall.
Anyway, an entertaining open game ending in 2-2
See @curly_tomShould be winning it if we are improving.
See @curly_tom
He is bitter about robins going
Doesn't like lampard because he replaced him
Now is demanding immediate improvement or wants to brand the robins sacking a poor decision
And finnaly he sets a ridiculous criteria for success for lampard
Some of us can see through these posts.
See @curly_tom
He is bitter about robins going
Doesn't like lampard because he replaced him
Now is demanding immediate improvement or wants to brand the robins sacking a poor decision
And finnaly he sets a ridiculous criteria for success for lampard
Some of us can see through these posts.
Only other option would be Eccles to RB or keep MVE at RB but rest Thomas for Kitching with Lati as the right sided CB for a better passer as a CBI agree with all of that though RB is a conundrum
Lati has been awful when he's played there in the past but I think MVE really needs a break.
Only other option would be Eccles to RB or keep MVE at RB but rest Thomas for Kitching with Lati as the right sided CB for a better passer as a CB
They’re third from bottom! Are there any games this season you expect us to win?
“ridiculous criteria for success” = winning football matches against teams worse than you
No away wins are a given in this league. Is this your first season watching?They’re third from bottom! Are there any games this season you expect us to win?
“ridiculous criteria for success” = winning football matches against teams worse than you
Well tbf there has been an improvement ppg and we have climbed the table a little. People need to be realistic wether they like king or not.The immediate improvement agenda was set by hero to many on here, Doug King.
Its his fault people are demanding it.
Fortunately, when comes to football, I think the mans a fucking idiot and have much more realistic expectations
Well tbf there has been an improvement ppg and we have climbed the table a little. People need to be realistic wether they like king or not.
Unfortunately it will take a massive shift for Simms to get close to top form. He's so far away at the moment. Although the boost of starting may help.It's a tricky one about who to start up front.
If Simms is on his game he can hold it up and lay it off quickly to get us up the pitch quickly. If not then the ball is coming straight back at us.
But people only quote when it suits them. They say he's a liar about anything they don't like.Well we've kept 2 clean sheets, which Im happy with because I said the first thing that needs sorting out is the defence.
But it's not about liking King or not, he's the one who came out with all the bullshit people keep quoting.
But people only quote when it suits them. They say he's a liar about anything they don't like.
See what you are saying though. Your still making it about those that believe king and those that don't. Wether you admit it or not it's an agenda that's all I'm saying. Tbf you are not letting it affect your posts on lampard but others most certainly are. "Well king said improvement so if he don't do it next game he's a failure" . It's idiotic irrespective of what king has come out withWell people say what's said in an interview must be gospel, when it suits them.
I've consistently said people sometimes play to the gallery in interviews
But back to the elite coach comments, of course people are going to quote King.
King has made this rod for Lampards back, well its not really a rod, its just nonsense on a forum, but it's still bollocks he should have kept to himself.
See what you are saying though. Your still making it about those that believe king and those that don't. Wether you admit it or not it's an agenda that's all I'm saying. Tbf you are not letting it affect your posts on lampard but others most certainly are. "Well king said improvement so if he don't do it next game he's a failure" . It's idiotic irrespective of what king has come out with
I have left the robins asking behind. Judging just on lampard. And I've seen a solid start. I don't factor in other stuff. I don't care if king wants promotion this season or to avoid relegation. I'm just judging on what I've seen from lampard and the fact I'm in my forties and watched slot of footy I know that a manager needs time to bed in his tactics fully. So far so good for me.
Why? You have just said it clearly regarding injuries and short time as manager etcI'm not sure why you wouldn't expect people to hold the owner accountable for things he said?
Elite level coach, top 6 deck, fitteset squad ever, arbitrary points totals by Christmas, he made all these comments.
I don't think expecting improvement is unreasonable, I do think it's unreasonable after a handful of games and injuries to 2 key players which is why I'll give Lampard a lot more time.
But King holds a lot of responsibility for the attitude of those that expect immediate returns.
Should be winning it if we are improving.
Cos Doug king said so apparentlyWhy?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?