I agree 100%. I know not everyone was behind the idea but I don’t think King should have blocked the Bamford transfer considering Lampard wanted him.
sorry mate ,
And set a great example by getting sent off for divingAlready wore the captains band at Sheff Utd too
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Would he even pass a medical?
His shoulder needs surgery
So you'd be think looking at the lynchpin of our team being over 30 and no-one looking like being able to do the same job he does in the team (meaning we're flogged him too hard and now he's feeling the effects along with almost kamikaze tactics leaving him exposed) would be the highest priority?Our transfer policy has and will always be mostly succession planning under King.
So you'd be think looking at the lynchpin of our team being over 30 and no-one looking like being able to do the same job he does in the team meaning we're flogged him too hard and now he's feeling the effects (along with almost kamikaze tactics leaving him exposed) would be the highest priority?
There are still days to go in the transfer window so not going to criticise yet, but it seems plainly obvious to me that both in terms of current squad AND success planning a back up to Grimes is the most important consideration.
One reason I don’t want Onyeka is I think that position is going to be key if we go up and I don’t think Grimes is up to PL football physically. I think we’re going to need to spend good money there.
Let's get up first and then worry about what's required in the PL.
I hear this, but there’s a chance Onyeka works with how we will have to play should we be lucky enough to get over the line. He looks “physically” capable (I’m yet to see the football side of his game of course!).One reason I don’t want Onyeka is I think that position is going to be key if we go up and I don’t think Grimes is up to PL football physically. I think we’re going to need to spend good money there.
There's a couple of factors in this approach , longevity, contract's of others,it sounds wrong to me on that basis, but in the cold light of day I'd be for it have tbh.If it strengthens the squad, I wouldn't be too unhappy at Rudoni going.
Not been working for him for a while here anyway, so if it means getting the players we need in, so be it.
Like him a lot, but that's football.
I used to worry about being an insomniac but now I just sleep on itThanks for yourconcern bad boy .
Fotunately I live on a hill so Tewkesbury on Sea as I call it hadn’t affected me yet !
Im just an insomniac
I expected a more regular re supply to replace the ship outs originally.to answer the OP, looks like transfer policy is "put together a squad capable of making the playoffs three out of five seasons, then when that squad over performs, try to capitalise by adding quality in the Jan window". Not a great title for a policy but
Our transfer policy is simple. Buy wingers and if we can't buy them get them on loan. Whats confusing ;-)I just don’t know what going on , what with the new signing of another winger, rumours of Rudoni to Brentford and someone coming in from that club.
I’m not a very sophisticated knowledgeable fan but I’m utterly confused as the what we are trying to achieve.
Would be interested in other views .
Thanks
Getting in competition on the wings and in Esse more likely competition for 10 slot as well.I just don’t know what going on , what with the new signing of another winger, rumours of Rudoni to Brentford and someone coming in from that club.
I’m not a very sophisticated knowledgeable fan but I’m utterly confused as the what we are trying to achieve.
Would be interested in other views .
Thanks
Ref was mistaken.And set a great example by getting sent off for diving
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?