If they're underage then it's automatically rape as they're not considered to be able to consent.Rape can be difficult to prove in many cases too. Horrible c**t.
Its classed as rape for 13 years and underIf they're underage then it's automatically rape as they're not considered to be able to consent.
Grim ain't it specially as he has a child himself.Wow , what a c**t
It’s classed as rape for 13 years and under14 to 15 may get classed different. Wtf has he been doing
I think the circumstances are if a 15 year old is seeing a 17 year old or 14 year old and 16 year oldThink it’s 13 and under can’t consent ever. 14/15 there can be circumstances. The length of time and stuff this looks like grooming and the family have found out and pressed charges to take a while guess.
Tbh I wouldn't even have a problem if he was 18 and she was 15, knowing how immature lads are, albeit the law says differently, but this fekker is 24 and got a kid. No excuses.I think the circumstances are if a 15 year old is seeing a 17 year old or 14 year old and 16 year old
Illegal but they're all still kids and theres less than a two year age gap.
At the very least he'll be beating a retreat.I bet the bloke who started the fundraiser feels sick to the stomach
Tbh I wouldn't even have a problem if he was 18 and she was 15, knowing how immature lads are, albeit the law says differently, but this fekker is 24 and got a kid. No excuses.
I think the circumstances are if a 15 year old is seeing a 17 year old or 14 year old and 16 year old
Illegal but they're all still kids and theres less than a two year age gap.
Sounded like a c**t at the Doug King forum.
Which laws?It maybe best to lock this thread given the laws on discussion and reporting ongoing criminal cases.
Which laws?
Not sure but just after King did his big speech about the reasons for sacking MR, he asked “why no loan players?” like a Neanderthal.Was that guy where King clapped back at him pretty hard?
Not sure but just after King did his big speech about the reasons for sacking MR, he asked “why no loan players?” like a Neanderthal.
Not sure but just after King did his big speech about the reasons for sacking MR, he asked “why no loan players?” like a Neanderthal.
I thought that person and the guy who said ‘and this is another mistake [sacking Robins]’ guy were dicks.
I know slightly off topic. Apologies.What the fuck has that got to do with him being accused of being nonce for fucks sake?!
What the fuck has that got to do with him being accused of being nonce for fucks sake?!
Well he won’t be at belmarsh
Well playedHe's been well and truly snared.
Yeah but it rhymes!Well he won’t be at belmarsh
Belmarsh to the arch.Yeah but it rhymes!
I dont think there's a law about discussing ongoing trials unless you are providing new infoShouldnt discuss ongoing trials as they might prejudice the outcome.
I dont think there's a law about discussing ongoing trials unless you are providing new info
"Might be". I dont reckon they'll be arsed on hereIt’s contempt of court. I think the worst here comes under saying if you think he’s guilty here at worst.
Contempt of court
What being in 'contempt of court' means, who can be in contempt of court, what the consequences are, how to report it, how to avoid it on social media (such as Twitter and Facebook).www.gov.uk
View attachment 42676
Who?Zak Starkey is looking for a gig.
Innocent until proven guilty beyond all reasonable doubt, remember.Be going away for a few years
Seems a fair few charges , id be surprised if he was innocent considering the screenshots going aboutInnocent until proven guilty beyond all reasonable doubt, remember.
Agree. He's a dirty little nonce sho will be rightly locked up.Seems a fair few charges , id be surprised if he was innocent considering the screenshots going about
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?