Nick
Administrator
really? Like you read the thread about the wasps agreement to come here before strangely trying to divert it.
Just before even more news that weakens one of the points even more comes out.
really? Like you read the thread about the wasps agreement to come here before strangely trying to divert it.That doesn't take away from the fact you don't read my comments before jumping on them - it's embarrassing.
really? Like you read the thread about the wasps agreement to come here before strangely trying to divert it.
Just before even more news that weakens one of the points even more comes out.
So maybe if people didnt put up with the pr? The trust can do pr.
Right - you're saying that all sides need to be hammered, but when it's highlighted that promises haven't been kept to on both sides this is suddenly a huge issue.
Honestly, you couldn't make this stuff up!
Yes they can do PR, but it helps if there is something positive to do PR about. All for that. Just waiting or rather hoping, that SISU offer something - commitment, conciliatory gesture, support for the culture City application - anything positive to use as pr.
Because within a few minutes of something being pointed out about Wasps it is being turned around...again.
Can you really not see that? You were the one on here saying Wasps fans should be able to post on here as it isn't against the rules.
It's a joke, no other set of fans would be applauded by people like Wasps fans for sticking up for them.
You mean like the PR that was done leading up to the positive news about the Higgs? It doesn't have to be positive for PR.
SISU are masters of negative PR, look where it has got us. In a corner looking like losers. IMo we have to change takt and do something which shows we are an integral part of the Coventry sports szene. JRs and weak leadership don't get us anywhere. Put something on the table. Send CA back to writing books and bring in someone with charisma and balls who we can get behind.
Why was it only being pointed out about Wasps? That's the point you're blissfully ignoring.
All sides should be hammered, but let's only point out the failures of one side to stick to their word. Really!
You also tried to make out the suggestion that SISU would build a stadium was said years ago, but 'forgot' about the minuted meeting Fisher had with RBC last March.
You keep referring back to my saying about Wasps fans should be allowed to post here - oddly the 'glitch' in the system happened exactly the same day preventing me from posting here for over six months! - and despite how you've decided to process it, the whole conversation spiralled downwards with people trying to jump on my left, right and centre so I just played along, I accept not my finest moment.
I'm sure you'll tell me this isn't what my intention was, as you seem to have this fantastic ability to know what people actually mean - which I seem to recall was one of the driving factors of that situation last September before the 'glitch' developed! - but you'd be wrong.
It appears you think I'm Team Wasps - this is utter nonsense (I'll await your reply saying that it's clear this is the case, make reference to posts from last September or my Twitter account which you've taken upon yourself to go through with a fine tooth comb).
My position is to look at the situation objectively and from where I'm standing all the other parties have just got on with business whilst SISU have stood still and now their plans have fallen flat they're having to play catch up.
The negotiations around Ricoh and Higgs should have started twelve months ago (before you try making the point, no I'm not saying this definitely would have all gone swimmingly) but in that twelve months the other parties have moved forward.
There seems to be this opinion, which even Anderson has stated, that the other parties should have also stood still until SISU decided what they wanted to do.
This isn't how good business works.
Are they? With a massive helping hand from ACL and Higgs on the negative PR front you mean?
It is still strange that CCFC fans lap up the PR of a London Rugby team or a stadium management company just so they can use it as a stick to beat their football club with.
What have SISU achieved as a positive for the club, fans or city in the last two years?
I am not really that stupid to fall for the "point out where I said" stuff when it is quite clear what you were insinuating.
What you mean is that you can't because I didn't say it.
However, yet again you're able to demonstrate your fantastic ability to actually know what people mean better than they do!
My posts contain all of the information I want to get across - just because you take more from them or try and put another slant on them is your doing, but please don't try and tell me what I'm thinking or trying to get say.
Why would you put it on a Wasps thread? The best idea would be to have a thread about each running, it was quite obvious what you were trying to do.
No, it is being able to see what people are trying to get across. I can try and put something across or insinuate but not actually say those exact words and then just reply.
If Wasps fans are congratulating you on sticking up for them on a CCFC forum (if they are) then surely they must be seeing the same thing.
The question has to be asked why you made a post about Wasps in the CCFC forum.
My posts aren't trying to insinuate anything - please don't try and make out you know more about my intentions that I do.
Try actually reading my comments in future and replying to the points I've made rather than what you think I'm trying to say.
Nick, however you try and dress this up your are 100% incorrect.
My posts aren't trying to insinuate anything - please don't try and make out you know more about my intentions that I do.
Try actually reading my comments in future and replying to the points I've made rather than what you think I'm trying to say.
Did you miss the point about Coventry City in there and it affecting us? It was CCFC related because it was promised CCFC wouldn't be affected, which quite clearly they are.
That is why it was on the CCFC Forum and that is why it was 100% relevant.
And my post was about how the broken promise by SISU have impacted on CCFC so also in the correct forum and 100% relevant.
There has been bullshit given by all sides.And my post was about how the broken promise by SISU have impacted on CCFC so also in the correct forum and 100% relevant.
Maybe you should be a bit clearer, as it sometimes reads different. (not all of the time)
There has been bullshit given by all sides.
No, no, no!
If you need clarification around my points, you ask for that clarification.
You don't reply based on what you 'think' I was trying to say.
That's just not how conversation either online or face-to-face work.
You appear (in my opinion, I'd would state it as fact!) that you start reading anything I write with the prerequisite that it's having a dig at CCFC/SISU and supporting Wasps.
You (in my opinion) then decide that I'm trying to say something else or add an additional slant to it and reply based on this rather than my actual points.
What I'm trying to say or get across is there front and centre in the text - don't try and imply otherwise as you're wrong. Fact.
I'll await the 'it's obvious that's what you're doing' reply - nope, still wrong.
Are they? With a massive helping hand from ACL and Higgs on the negative PR front you mean?
It is still strange that CCFC fans lap up the PR of a London Rugby team or a stadium management company just so they can use it as a stick to beat their football club with.
Yes, but not relevant to the thread. So you should have started a new thread with it...
Otherwise if somebody says "the wasps move was based on x y and z" and it is now showing to be untrue and not kept to and then a city fan storms in and says "yes but ccfc have not kept to the promise of a b and c" it certainly looks strange as a first thought. Why would somebody think "I know, to answer something Wasps and the council bullshitted on, I am going to have more goes at the club".
Nope, if it was for anything you write then I would have said it for things where you were talking about planning where you obviously know what you are talking about with it.
It is just the fact of the way you say things and the time you say things. IE in reply to somebody pointing something out with Wasps and then you saying something aimed at CCFC.
Take your tinfoil hat off for two minutes.
The thread was about broken promises, so was relevant.
However you'd decided to focus purely on those of Wasps - why?
I thought all sides needed hammering?
Why didn't you start a thread pointing out the broken promises of SISU or have the thread covering both?
I get the feeling you're getting your conspiracy theories muddled up.
What's the problem with a thread focused on Wasps and their promises and how it is damaging on CCFC?
Pretty sure there are a few about SISU damaging on here aren't there?
See now you aren't actually saying you have an issue with it being pointed out, but the way you are going on and the way you replied to it makes it look as if you have an issue with it. The same way on Twitter a random person makes a comment about Wasps attendances and you fly in there as well. Why would you?
No conspiracy theory there, just common sense.
armybike , why do you follow councilors on Twitter ,either you are incredibly sad and lonely, or you have a pro wasps agenda, as all Cov councilors are very very pro wasps.
Do you question these councilors on Twitter for that email they sent to the Butts trying to change the lease, if you are as neutral as you say, you surely would have done that.
You seem to point out SISU's every fault but not of the council, it's there for everyone to see
think you need to stop following Simon Gilbert, that is his line.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?