I've never made an anti CCC post?
Right
The perception of you on here is you are pro council. Sorry that's the way it is.
That is your perception. Anyone not slavishly following your line is pro council. Sorry that's the way it is.
I consider myself pro ccfc
Don't forget Reid Fans.I think everyone is getting a bit confused now. I know I am could people please put on their posts wether they are pro CCC or pro SISU that would help. Thank you
I consider myself pro ccfc
Don't need to have Reid fans that will be obvious from what they put.Don't forget Reid Fans.
Sent from my SM-N910F using Tapatalk
Don't need to have Reid fans that will be obvious from what they put.
All this talk about the Butts. Frankly I sense it's all smoke and mirrors. We will remain at the Ricoh for many reasons but here are a few...
1. WASP (ACL) need the cities football club with potentially large crowd drawing income streams and a nice rental income for years to come. Rather than lose them I suspect they will end up courting them with inducements, maybe a share of ownership eventually. See out the current owners first would be their goal.
2. CCFC can't at present afford to build a new stadium of it's own with a capacity to match it's potential. As a club we are too big for the Butts and the infrastructure is not there. Times have changed since HR folks. The peppercorn rent we pay now and any future rent will stay low as WASP need us. CCFC will wait till they can secure a share of ownership at the Ricoh at least, maybe when we have new owners with deeper pockets. The profile of the football club far exceeds the rugby club and both sides know it.
3. The council should do everyone a favour and keep their nose out at all times.
All this talk about the Butts. Frankly I sense it's all smoke and mirrors. We will remain at the Ricoh for many reasons but here are a few...
1. WASP (ACL) need the cities football club with potentially large crowd drawing income streams and a nice rental income for years to come. Rather than lose them I suspect they will end up courting them with inducements, maybe a share of ownership eventually. See out the current owners first would be their goal.
2. CCFC can't at present afford to build a new stadium of it's own with a capacity to match it's potential. As a club we are too big for the Butts and the infrastructure is not there. Times have changed since HR folks. The peppercorn rent we pay now and any future rent will stay low as WASP need us. CCFC will wait till they can secure a share of ownership at the Ricoh at least, maybe when we have new owners with deeper pockets. The profile of the football club far exceeds the rugby club and both sides know it.
3. The council should do everyone a favour and keep their nose out at all times.
Smoke today the fire
Jon Sharp the Chairman/Owner of CRFC
is seeking to take ownership of the leases into his own one man company rather than that of the Club.
The rent will not stay as low as it is now, wasps will try to squeeze every penny they can from us. Yes they need us at the Ricoh, but given we would not survive another stint at Sixfields, Wasps hold the monopoly on football stadiums and all in all and it pains me to say it for the next 10 years at least, we need the Ricoh more than the Ricoh needs us.
Oh and there's no way wasps will offer us part ownership as an enticement to sign a rent deal...
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
Or the deluded cov tel fans?Don't forget Reid Fans.
Sent from my SM-N910F using Tapatalk
We just need to tread water at the Ricoh for the moment.
I believe that once we get in the Championship and we are back on the radar other possibilities will present themselves.
We are hardly 'off the radar'.
The rent will not stay as low as it is now, wasps will try to squeeze every penny they can from us. Yes they need us at the Ricoh, but given we would not survive another stint at Sixfields, Wasps hold the monopoly on football stadiums and all in all and it pains me to say it for the next 10 years at least, we need the Ricoh more than the Ricoh needs us.
Oh and there's no way wasps will offer us part ownership as an enticement to sign a rent deal...
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
Smoke today the fire
Jon Sharp the Chairman/Owner of CRFC
is seeking to take ownership of the leases into his own one man company rather than that of the Club.
Could be something like that NWHmmm.
Any context? Club in difficulty?
We are where it matters.
What's this off the radar shit? It's like when somebody hears a phrase and keeps saying it.
It's a well known term that means no one other than CCFC fans are interested in us because we are at such a low level that we don't count.
Sponsors don't care because we have little coverage in national media or TV. Potential purchasers don't get the buzz out of a League One team so won't look at us. (82 words)
or...
Off the radar (3 words)
It's a business term used and accepted by highly intelligent individuals.
Be nice if we did have a posting cap on here.Italia posting cap yet again. That's why there seem to be weekly articles in the national press about us, djs talking about us on national stations and we signed Joe Cole.
We are still going to bring in more sponsorship and interest than an out of town London rugby club in Coventry.
sorry based on what?We are still going to bring in more sponsorship and interest than an out of town London rugby club in Coventry.
sorry based on what?
Rugby has a higher media profile (in particular TV coverage) than football outside the Premiership. More attractive to sponsors. Also rugby seems to have a different sponsorship base to football anyway.
My understanding was the Wasps corporate hospitality etc. was selling better than the football club's.
Which major employers/businesses in the Coventry area have significant sponsorship or financial relationships with the football club? WHy do we find it so difficult to even find a decent long-term shirt sponsor?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?