Matt smith
Well-Known Member
The amount of times we have the ball and just go backwards is so boring to watch
The amount of times we have the ball and just go backwards is so boring to watchThe inconsistency is so frustrating with this team where in some games it’s higher tempo and encouraging, then the next reverts to type.
No it’s notSomebody on twitter has said we've never kept a clean sheet with Latibeaudiere in the team ? Can't be true anybody know if that's true
No it’s not
In Defence
Some Sunday digging on our defence in the last season and a bit, our clean sheets in that time: Middlesbrough - Thomas, McFadzean, Latibeaudiere Sunderland - Thomas, McFadzean, Latibeaudiere Blackburn - Thomas, McFadzean, Binks /change 4back Stoke - Thomas, Kitching Millwall - Thomas...www.skybluestalk.co.uk
Ha trueMiddlesbrough
I am also not surprised to see Shmeee not defending wide midfielder JDS today
It was one of the top twoIt was. It wasn't our worst performance of the season is the point being made.
It was a really poor performance , nobody said when we were wank against Leeds.. but it's LeedsIt was one of the top two
Good centre backs aren't constantly making last ditch blocksOpinions, Thomas is good
How many times has he saved us with vital blocks etc
Burnley’s defence is the best in division for a reason. In fact, their defensive record is the best ever in the Championship at this stage of the season.Created nothing all game.
Good centre backs aren't constantly making last ditch blocks
Everyone else realising Lati is proper wank and drags the team down
Imo, teams easily play through our midfield and I don’t think either Eccles or Sheaf are bad midfielders defensively. Which therefore, suggests something fundamentally defective with our tactical instructions/approach.Good centre backs aren't constantly making last ditch blocks
It was a really poor performance , nobody said when we were wank against Leeds.. but it's Leeds
Leeds are ten times the team Burnley are.
Yet Burnley beat them away and are above them in the leagueLeeds are ten times the team Burnley are.
This describes about 90% of our goals conceded this season.Their first goal we gave the ball away really cheaply (I think it was Binks) and then just seemed so vulnerable to a change of pace from Burnley. There seems to be a real lack of organisation as to who does what when the ball is turned over.
Leeds go top if they win tomorrowYet Burnley beat them away and are above them in the league
THANKYOU !!!!It was a pretty bizarre line up and game plan from Carr in the first half. Why he thought sitting 10 behind the ball against a low scoring Burnley team was a good plan I'm not sure.
Yet Burnley beat them away and are above them in the league
You talk about Burnley’s defensive strength but tonight I didn’t see them even remotely tested. And the one dimensional way we try to attack the goal is a threat to nobody.This describes about 90% of our goals conceded this season.
Your argument makes no sense. It would make sense if the league was decided purely based on how teams do against us?In the games against us Leeds were far better than Burnley. I’m not sure how you can argue differently. How they played against each other without us is irrelevant.
This describes about 90% of our goals conceded this season.
They’d all be promotedYour argument makes no sense. It would make sense if the league was decided purely based on how teams do against us?
100% - maybe King was fundamentally right about Robins being exposed without an elite coach such as AV aside him.Every goal has about three people making basic errors it seems. Screams lack of defensive organisation.
Maybe I’m missing the point slightly, but I thought that was one of our strengths under robins. We usually started poor and grew into games, which is why we saw so many last minute equalisers and winners under himI've seen it with Robins a few times which makes me believe teams struggle to change their mindset during matches .
If teams set up negatively they often struggle when required to go up the gears
Your argument makes no sense. It would make sense if the league was decided purely based on how teams do against us?
The irony isn’t lost on me that I could be watching us in L1 with a ‘Premier League’ season cardIf you’re feeling shit and want to feel a little bit better before you go to sleep, console yourself that you’re not me. I’m still on the £500 premier league package and so far this season have only been able to watch 2 games live. My cost per game so far this season is £250it can always be worse
It’s my turn to make you feel better. I lumped £550 on the PL package this season…If you’re feeling shit and want to feel a little bit better before you go to sleep, console yourself that you’re not me. I’m still on the £500 premier league package and so far this season have only been able to watch 2 games live. My cost per game so far this season is £250it can always be worse
I misread, and thought you were saying Leeds were 10x better than Burnley in general.The league? What the fuck are you on about?
When we, Coventry City Football Club, the team we discuss on Sky Blues Talk, played these teams Leeds were far better than Burnley. So when we, Coventry City fans discussing Coventry city on Sky Blues Talk, are discussing whether Coventry City’s performance was better against Burnley or Leeds what matters is the games Coventry City played against these teams, not how they played against any other team in the league.
I think I have some crayons about if that would help.
I misread, and thought you were saying Leeds were 10x better than Burnley in general.
no need to be such a cockwomble, especially after the bollocks you’ve talked on here recently
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?