Is he? The general feedback from fans who watched him at his Nuneaton loan spell and the pre season games is that Charles Cook has looked better and more confident.Burge is better and will play more.
Burge is better and will play more.
'We all know how good a goalkeeper Lee is'.... Yes we do, not very!
If anyone was going to post this, it was bound to be you :laugh:
From what I've seen of Cooke, he looks very confident in his own ability. Surprised to read that he has previously lacked confidence in coming for crosses; it certainly doesn't show any more!
Didn't realise he was 21 either. Thought he was slightly younger than that.
Will be surprised if he did oust Burge for the no.1 spot straight off, but wouldn't be surprised if he was our keeper at a later stage of the season.
Did he ever end up signing for anyone?We should have gone for Joe Murphy.
Did he ever end up signing for anyone?
Burge is a disaster waiting to happen. After the boo-boys treatment of Murphy I can't imagine he would want to come back here.
Whatever do you mean? I'm hurt by that accusation you git! It's as if you're implying I have a personal vendetta against him or something
(Come on, someone had to fill Jordan Clarke's boots)
'We all know how good a goalkeeper Lee is'.... Yes we do, not very!
Anyone but Burge in my opinion, worst keeper to ever wear the jersey in my lifetime. I live in hope that the number 13 jersey was deliberately left vacant. If not, it's Charles for me!
Do you think he is worse than Debec and Nuzzo, not sure how long your lifetime has been to see this couple of gems.
Modern goalkeepers normally have good distribution skills but he is like a throwback to Oggy.
for me Burge is the third worst keeper I have seen us have behind those two and slightly ahead of Avramovic and little lad that played a couple of games then got released.
The best for me was Hedman followed by Kirkland.
Approaching 30 now so seen a fair amount of shite over the past 20 or so. Hyldgaard and Shearer are another couple to add to that list. Nuzzo and Debec were a special breed too but thankfully weren't around too long in to cause any long term damage.
As much as I hate criticizing any particular player - and I'm sure Burge gives his all - he just simply isn't good enough, even at League 1 and it appears to be glaringly obvious to the majority of us. I think this may be a decision that TM actually goes back on.
Agree with your 2 favourite keepers but would also add Westwood to that list. He was superb, can't ever remember him making an error. If only we could call on someone of his stature now.
If Charles-Cook is deemed to be the better goalkeeper of the two Tony Mowbray will start with him have no fear of that and if TM sees Burge as number one thats fine by me, he sees him every day i don't. As for signing an experienced keeper they are a very expensive comodity, older 30 odd year olds command mega buck wages and would make a big hole in a £2.5million budget. I am keeping my fingers crossed one of these two do the business, yes there will be balls ups along the way but lets give either or both a bit of slack ffs.
He may have looked more confident but remember the end of last season, after all the fans had got off Burge's back, he was actually confident and a lot better. I even recall at Bristol city he had the ball on the ground ; their star striker was chasing him down and instead of just booting it he let him get close, sent him the wrong way and left him flat on his arse. Then booted it. My point being is if the fans give him chance and get off his back for every tiny mistake so he is confident, there's probably a good keeper in the making. Also Charles Cook has no experience whatsoever and needs to play in a cup game at least before the league.Is he? The general feedback from fans who watched him at his Nuneaton loan spell and the pre season games is that Charles Cook has looked better and more confident.
You're right about the budget, it certainly puts constraints on signing any proven quality. Does the budget grow if we sell more shirts and tickets than budgeted for? Exiting and successful football will sell more shirts and tickets but first you need the quality players on the pitch to give you that. We could go round in that circle forever couldn't we. The club desparately needs to put their hand in their pocket to get a good solid goalie first, and then maybe they will reap the rewards afterwards.Any player makes a big hole in this pathetic budget, would be interesting to know if the budget grows if we sell more shirts or tickets than budgeted for.
He may have looked more confident but remember the end of last season, after all the fans had got off Burge's back, he was actually confident and a lot better. I even recall at Bristol city he had the ball on the ground ; their star striker was chasing him down and instead of just booting it he let him get close, sent him the wrong way and left him flat on his arse. Then booted it. My point being is if the fans give him chance and get off his back for every tiny mistake so he is confident, there's probably a good keeper in the making. Also Charles Cook has no experience whatsoever and needs to play in a cup game at least before the league.
There's nothing to suggest Charles Cook is better either.Let's be careful else a Championship or Premiership club will come in for him. There's nothing to suggest he would be more suited to non-league football or league 2 at best.
There's nothing to suggest Charles Cook is better either.
If Burge is better we should get an experienced number 1 and then Burge as number 2. Then Charles Cook should be moved on.He can't be much worse though, can he? I'd like to see Burgess moved on with a more experienced number brought in with Charles Cook as number two.
You're right about the budget, it certainly puts constraints on signing any proven quality. Does the budget grow if we sell more shirts and tickets than budgeted for? Exiting and successful football will sell more shirts and tickets but first you need the quality players on the pitch to give you that. We could go round in that circle forever couldn't we. The club desparately needs to put their hand in their pocket to get a good solid goalie first, and then maybe they will reap the rewards afterwards.
He may have looked more confident but remember the end of last season, after all the fans had got off Burge's back, he was actually confident and a lot better. I even recall at Bristol city he had the ball on the ground ; their star striker was chasing him down and instead of just booting it he let him get close, sent him the wrong way and left him flat on his arse. Then booted it. My point being is if the fans give him chance and get off his back for every tiny mistake so he is confident, there's probably a good keeper in the making. Also Charles Cook has no experience whatsoever and needs to play in a cup game at least before the league.
The only shot he should have saved but didn't was the Peterborough free kick. Burge is actually a decent shot stopper.It's all good and well people saying that we should give him a chance, but how many has he had and squandered already? He cannot carry out the basics and there's nothing to suggest that he is a good keeper in the making based on his performances.
Worcester game aside, some of the goals he has let in would be more suited to Sunday league. Peterborough at home, the free kick, Crewe game at home.. No need to go on.
It's a clean slate this season so will back him to begin with but if carrys on with his flapping, shit kicking, staying on his line, costing us points etc then surely enough is enough.
The only shot he should have saved but didn't was the Peterborough free kick. Burge is actually a decent shot stopper.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?