Building Regulations (1 Viewer)

wafw1971 · Dec 10, 2013

I don't have the knowledge but I hope someone will, if CCFC want to build a new stadium inside the city boundaries on a piece of land they have bought legally and all the correct procedures are followed what right (in law) does the council have to refuse permission?

What if Sisu bought the Rugby ground and re-developed the 3 sides of the ground (which already have permission) would this be a viable option or could the council stop that too?

Grendel · Dec 10, 2013

The council would welcome it.

Greggs · Dec 10, 2013

I've heard they have applied to get King Henry School flattened and built on

wafw1971 · Dec 10, 2013

REALLLLLLLLLLLLLLLYYYYYYYYYYYYY! I thought it was going to be Memorial Park.

wingy · Dec 10, 2013

How about Hearsall Common ??

Railway station,Pubs galore Craven St / Earlsdon.

wafw1971 · Dec 10, 2013

People cant even get planning permission to put a bike lane on Hearsall common, I reckon they should close Hearsall golf course and build on that HS2 is being built next to it so its going to be ruined anyway.

Huckerby · Dec 10, 2013

I think it would be pretty easy for them to find a way to reject an application for permission. I think they could find things wrong with any plans if they wanted to?

hill83 · Dec 11, 2013

wingy said:
How about Hearsall Common ??

Railway station,Pubs galore Craven St / Earlsdon.

I'd love it if this did happen, being an Earlsdon resident myself.

Grendel · Dec 11, 2013

Huckerby said:
I think it would be pretty easy for them to find a way to reject an application for permission. I think they could find things wrong with any plans if they wanted to?

Why would they want to?

wingy · Dec 11, 2013

hill83 said:
I'd love it if this did happen, being an Earlsdon resident myself.

I used to live In Conniston rd .
Used to love getting In from work open the gate onto the park and get the kids playing Footy or Cricket.

wingy · Dec 11, 2013

Well I reckon this conversations been overtaken by tonights Revelation from Fisher that we're looking for Sixty acres.Sounds Rural to me.

The Gentleman · Dec 11, 2013

wingy said:
Well I reckon this conversations been overtaken by tonights Revelation from Fisher that we're looking for Sixty acres.Sounds Rural to me.

I did think for sometime that they might think of the old Jaguar site up by me behind Brown's Lane, to my horror.

We'll_live_and_die · Dec 11, 2013

The Council have every right to reject planning applications on any grounds that they see fit. For instance I live in Bedworth and someone applied to turn a shop into a takeaway. This was rejected as there are too many takeaways in the current area. CCC would have no problem refusing permission for a new Stadium within the City as there is one that's not being used at the moment and they are not looking to have a City full of white Elephants.
n.b. Building regulations are the regulations that must be worked to when constructing a building, planning permissions is the topic that is being discussed here.

fernandopartridge · Dec 11, 2013

wingy said:
How about Hearsall Common ??

Railway station,Pubs galore Craven St / Earlsdon.

I think there are limitations to building on common land tbh. It'd be brilliant up there mind you.

fernandopartridge · Dec 11, 2013

The Gentleman said:
I did think for sometime that they might think of the old Jaguar site up by me behind Brown's Lane, to my horror.

Isn't that site still owned by TATA?

wafw1971 · Dec 11, 2013

What revelations, I see nothing on any website to indicate Tim Fisher has said this can you let me know where you heard this ta.

fernandopartridge · Dec 11, 2013

Rich said:
The Council have every right to reject planning applications on any grounds that they see fit. For instance I live in Bedworth and someone applied to turn a shop into a takeaway. This was rejected as there are too many takeaways in the current area. CCC would have no problem refusing permission for a new Stadium within the City as there is one that's not being used at the moment and they are not looking to have a City full of white Elephants.
n.b. Building regulations are the regulations that must be worked to when constructing a building, planning permissions is the topic that is being discussed here.

They can't just reject it on 'grounds they see fit'. They must refer to the appropriate planning guidance / policy framework.

jesus-wept · Dec 11, 2013

Referring to the OP the rugby ground option has been mentioned before and usually poo-pooed on here due to location and parking etc but the ground currently holds 4500 and I believe has outline planning permission to develop the 3 other sides so lets assume the current capacity is quadruled to 16000 and the ground is used for rugby and football the idea is not that remote. So the opening question being if all the boxes are ticked could our council reject you would have to say no surely.

Suffolkskyblue · Dec 11, 2013

I always thought that CCC owned the butts! Not sure if they lease it to crfc on a long lease or rent it out though.

wingy · Dec 11, 2013

wafw1971 said:
What revelations, I see nothing on any website to indicate Tim Fisher has said this can you let me know where you heard this ta.

The Info that we are looking for 60 Acres of land .

wingy · Dec 11, 2013

Suffolkskyblue said:
I always thought that CCC owned the butts! Not sure if they lease it to crfc on a long lease or rent it out though.

A lease Just won't cut It though will It.

The Gentleman · Dec 11, 2013

fernandopartridge said:
Isn't that site still owned by TATA?

God knows, a few more big houses being built on the Brown's Lane side mate but the larger commercial area at the back is still the same. All I can remember from before is that Peugeot had outline planning which took them an age to get, when they went for full it just went tits up due to the amount of resident anger towards the idea. You around for xmas as thinking about a drink about the 28th.

fernandopartridge · Dec 11, 2013

The Gentleman said:
God knows, a few more big houses being built on the Brown's Lane side mate but the larger commercial area at the back is still the same. All I can remember from before is that Peugeot had outline planning which took them an age to get, when they went for full it just went tits up due to the amount of resident anger towards the idea. You around for xmas as thinking about a drink about the 28th.

Yeah, should be I think.

Building Regulations (1 Viewer)

New Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

New Member

Well-Known Member

New Member

Huckerby

Guest

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Super Moderator

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

New Member

Well-Known Member

New Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Users who are viewing this thread

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency