Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Video Bryan Richardson Interview | The sale of Highfield Road (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter Newsbot
  • Start date Jun 13, 2019
Forums New posts
N

Newsbot

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 13, 2019
  • #1

Watch on Youtube....
 

Covstu

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 13, 2019
  • #2
Hate this twat!
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 13, 2019
  • #3
Covstu said:
Hate this twat!
Click to expand...

Let's just listen to what he says. He is a pantomime villain but he wasn't the only person on the CCFC board at that time, he also left in 2002. He says that the option to return to Highfield Rd existed right up to the point the Arena was developed. For that reason, why on earth did the club's board ever agree to the farce deal for the Arena? What was actually in it for the club?
 
Reactions: Grendel

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 13, 2019
  • #4
fernandopartridge said:
Let's just listen to what he says. He is a pantomime villain but he wasn't the only person on the CCFC board at that time, he also left in 2002. He says that the option to return to Highfield Rd existed right up to the point the Arena was developed. For that reason, why on earth did the club's board ever agree to the farce deal for the Arena? What was actually in it for the club?
Click to expand...

Some nice seating?
 
Reactions: chiefdave

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 13, 2019
  • #5
Grendel said:
Some nice seating?
Click to expand...
It was of course an amazing coincidence that when the project no longer looked like providing a secure future for the club and talk turned to making use of the buyback clause on HR Mike McGinnity's company got the contact to put the seats in at the Ricoh.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 13, 2019
  • #6
The reality is Mcginnity sold the club down the river to protect himself and his buddy on the board
 

Ricketts

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 13, 2019
  • #7
The series of videos give an interesting insight into the world of football at the time.

Comments like "hate this twat" are just silly and devisive.
 
Reactions: Peter Billing and Iancro

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 13, 2019
  • #8
Ricketts said:
The series of videos give an interesting insight into the world of football at the time.

Comments like "hate this twat" are just silly and devisive.
Click to expand...

I thought everyone hates that twat. Hardly divisive.
 

oldskyblue58

CCFC Finance Director
  • Jun 13, 2019
  • #9
One question. How were CCFC going to be able to repay the £5m to be able to go back to Highfield Road? There was nothing like that in the bank and cash flow wasn't generating the kind of surplus to do it. The club was struggling to find any finance. It is one thing saying we could buy it back quite another being able to
 

skyblueinBaku

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 13, 2019
  • #10
oldskyblue58 said:
One question. How were CCFC going to be able to repay the £5m to be able to go back to Highfield Road? There was nothing like that in the bank and cash flow wasn't generating the kind of surplus to do it. The club was struggling to find any finance. It is one thing saying we could buy it back quite another being able to
Click to expand...
Richardson said that the club held on to the £5M paid by the developers for the land and could pay it back if they needed to return to Highfield road. He didn't say where the club held the money.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 13, 2019
  • #11
oldskyblue58 said:
One question. How were CCFC going to be able to repay the £5m to be able to go back to Highfield Road? There was nothing like that in the bank and cash flow wasn't generating the kind of surplus to do it. The club was struggling to find any finance. It is one thing saying we could buy it back quite another being able to
Click to expand...

Perhaps Higgs et al could have bought that instead of the stupid 50/50 deal in an, at the time, worthless company.
 

oldskyblue58

CCFC Finance Director
  • Jun 13, 2019
  • #12
skyblueindorset said:
Richardson said that the club held on to the £5M paid by the developers for the land and could pay it back if they needed to return to Highfield road. He didn't say where the club held the money.
Click to expand...

if they held it at all, it would have to be included in the audited financial statements. As at 31/05/2002 the club had £147k in the bank
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 13, 2019
  • #13
oldskyblue58 said:
One question. How were CCFC going to be able to repay the £5m to be able to go back to Highfield Road? There was nothing like that in the bank and cash flow wasn't generating the kind of surplus to do it. The club was struggling to find any finance. It is one thing saying we could buy it back quite another being able to
Click to expand...
Lot easier to find £5m to buy back HR than £100m to build a new stadium. They council seem pretty keen on giving loans on favourable terms to local businesses, sure they would have helped!
 
Reactions: ccfchoi87

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 13, 2019
  • #14
chiefdave said:
Lot easier to find £5m to buy back HR than £100m to build a new stadium. They council seem pretty keen on giving loans on favourable terms to local businesses, sure they would have helped!
Click to expand...

Remember too that the £5m was stadium + land the other side of Thackhall St, i.e. a portion of it could have still been sold on to developers or retained by Taylor Wimpey. But, that would never have fitted with the council's objectives at the time.
 

skyblueinBaku

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 13, 2019
  • #15
oldskyblue58 said:
if they held it at all, it would have to be included in the audited financial statements. As at 31/05/2002 the club had £147k in the bank
Click to expand...
Unless Richardson held it in one of his own accounts!
 

oldskyblue58

CCFC Finance Director
  • Jun 13, 2019
  • #16
Might be misunderstanding this but Richardson seemed to imply the other land was held by someone else not by the club. Could it be that the idea was to sell both plots as one and to split the proceeds proportionately?

edit ..... see below my next post
 
Last edited: Jun 13, 2019

eastwoodsdustman

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 13, 2019
  • #17
I'm sure I read somewhere that Mcginnity's son was involved in the buying of Highfield Road and then renting it back to us.
 

oldskyblue58

CCFC Finance Director
  • Jun 13, 2019
  • #18
skyblueindorset said:
Unless Richardson held it in one of his own accounts!
Click to expand...

would be included as a debtor in the financial statements and should have been disclosed as a related party transaction.

The sale of the two plots is included in the 2000 financials. Thackhall St had an original cost of £486k.

I think they spent it paying bills. Even then it wasnt enough because there was £10m in loans that year too
 
I

I was eleven in 87

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 13, 2019
  • #19
Does anyone know why the Club have done these interviews with Richardson?
I can’t see what the point is or what it achieves?
 

junglej13

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 13, 2019
  • #20
A lot of commercial property transactions can be murky at best. In truth Richardson was quite visionary in all this and seems like he had a decent grasp on development. No different to what housebuilders and commercial developers do day in day out.

Wasn't the bigger issue here that apparently Tesco bought a third of the Ricoh site for more than the entire Highfield Road was sold for. The question mark has always been about where this profit went and any other proceeds from the remainder of the wider site?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?