Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Breakaway/Phoenix Club (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter mark82
  • Start date Jul 10, 2013
Forums New posts

In the current situation, do you support a breakaway/phoenix club?

  • Yes, I would support a breakaway/phoenix club

    Votes: 42 43.3%
  • No, I don't support a breakaway/phoenix club

    Votes: 31 32.0%
  • Currently undecided

    Votes: 24 24.7%

  • Total voters
    97
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

CCFC_GT

New Member
  • Jul 11, 2013
  • #36
A summary of my previous posts:-

... I don't trust the FL to do what is right or follow their rule book, and I am worried that we might waste 3 to 5 years hanging on to the hope that CCFC will return to the Cov area, which might never happen. SISU might even have a hidden agenda to develop their franchise in Northampton long term. In the meantime a phoenix club would at least give some CCFC fans an alternative on Saturdays and couldn't do any harm. In 3 to 5 years both clubs could be at or around the same level anyway. Agree with others we don't need 2 or 3 phoenix clubs though, just one with a CCFC focus.
... Having slept on this, people are right in saying that we the supporters are the football club, and I would support the creation of a phoenix club created solely for the purpose of being the new CCFC. Before anyone suggests otherwise, this doesn't have to split the fans and we should all accept how each of us chooses to follow our club without pointless bickering. Nor should this mean that we give up hope or stop fighting to get the legal entity of our original club back from SISU/Northampton because that is what we all want. It is just that we may never succeed in getting this and plan B should start now rather than in 3 to 5 years time. Should we at some stage get the legal entity of CCFC back we all know that is where we the supporters who are the club will pledge our support, and the need for the phoenix club disappears and it can be disbanded or swallowed up by CCFC.
Adopting Sphinx or following the new club the local businessmen have recently been promoting just wouldn't cut it for me, because to gain my support the sole and clear purpose of the phoenix club from the beginning should be a continuation of the heart and soul of CCFC by us the fans.
To this end I would also suggest that it would be in the wider interests of CCC/ACL (both in terms of the image of the city and longer term investment) to support this venture by making the Ricoh available to the phoenix club without charge as it's home right from the start in the Midland Combination, with revenues all going to the football club to enable investment to give it the greatest chance of year on year promotions. Yes we would be rattling around in a huge stadium but at least it would feel like home and it would encourage support. Better still if PH4 buys a stake in the Ricoh and invests in the phoenix club rather than loading debt onto it.
The club colours would be sky blue and we would all sing traditional sky blues songs. It just gives us another option rather than waiting to see what happens at some point years ahead.
... what if the terms of (PH4) buying into the Ricoh include making an initial (or continuing) non-controlling investment into the football club. Again I would say that it is in the long term interests of CCC/ACL to have a successful football club in the city, and so they should support such a term.
... there doesn't appear to be any other option for regular use of the Ricoh stadium that can have the future potential of a phoenix CCFC, unless of course we can get the original CCFC back.
... So unless the FL decides SISU is not fit & proper, or something gives between SISU and ACL, what have CCC/ACL to lose by agreeing to make the phoenix club at the Ricoh a viable possibility during it's early development until it can afford to contribute to costs whilst still having access to revenues.
... This means for me that the phoenix club should be just like a continuation of CCFC playing at the Ricoh wearing sky blue kit and singing sky blue songs with the full and clear intention of becoming the new CCFC if we can't get the old one back.
Finally I would stress that this shouldn't be seen as giving up on getting CCFC back, or a black and white choice between choosing to follow phoenix/startup or CCFC. Personally I would hope to see as many CCFC away games as I can and as many phoenix/startup home games as I can. It should be remembered as well that many CCFC home supporters will simply not be able to or be willing to make the effort to go to Northampton and this may be the only realistic option for them.
I just don't see what we would have to lose.

My reply to BSB:-
1. If CCC/ACL wouldn't let a fledgling phoenix/start-up use the venue free of charge and to take all the proceeds from games then I agree the club would not be viable at the Ricoh. But I hope I have already set out several reasons for a positive outcome on this:-
a) There doesn't appear to be any other option for regular use of the Ricoh stadium that can have the future potential of a phoenix CCFC, unless of course we can get the original CCFC back. So my question would be what are the better alternatives available to CCC/ACL?
b) It would be in the wider interests of CCC/ACL (both in terms of the image of the city and longer term investment) to support this venture (unless we can get CCFC back)
c) If, despite my arguments above, CCC/ACL are still not prepared to allow the fledgling club to grow with revenues on a free of charge basis until it is able to contribute to costs, then I see another possible option. It is reported that PH4 intends to proceed with the purchase of a half share of the Ricoh. In contracts it is quite normal for CCC to insist on various pre-conditions such as building infrastructure etc., and in the case of the Ricoh I believe it would be in CCC/ACL interests to insist (because it would be in CCC/ACL long term interests to do so) that any investment in the Ricoh goes hand in hand with an initial or on-going investment in the fledgling club to cover costs until the club is able to cover through revenues.
2. I agree with you that there will inevitably be some polarisation of the fan base, because it already exists, and as Stewpot detailed there are already various categories of supporter. where we will all end up will depend on what happens. Should we at some stage get the legal entity of CCFC back from SISU/Northampton we all know that is where we the supporters who are the club will pledge our support, and the need for the phoenix club disappears and it can be disbanded or swallowed up by CCFC.
3. if PH4 buys a half share in the Ricoh that makes this all the more possible. IF PH4 is the principal investor (without loading debt) in the phoenix club and ultimately the successful purchaser of CCFC at some stage in the future that would ease this process. All the time, energy and money put into the 'phoenix' club for me from the outset should be for the purpose of reuniting us the supporters who are the club with the legal entity of CCFC within Coventry by hopefully persuading SISU to sell, or if that can't happen then giving us a vehicle for continuation of the heart and soul of CCFC at the Ricoh.

My reply to BSB:-
If you read again you will see that my point is not based on optimism that PH4 will want to invest in a Midlands Combination club, though from a public relations angle it is quite conceivable that he might be quite willing to do so anyway even if this is initially by not levying costs on the club to play there (avoiding any possible regulations on investment in the club). What additional costs that ACL doesn't already face would be incurred by opening one stand once a fortnight and maintaining the pitch to Midland Combination level? Costs for policing and stewarding would be relative to the size of crowd anyway, and the greater the crowd the greater the income for the club from tickets, kit merchandise and possibly even catering, and with that the possibility to contribute to costs through income. I have thrown catering in there as well because what has compass got to lose, would it rather have 100% of nothing or 50% of something? I have never indulged in the catering on offer at the Ricoh out of principle but would if I knew my club would benefit.
I fully accept that if PH4/ACL have some grandiose alternative development plan for the Ricoh and surrounding area that maybe includes roofing the stadium to provide a year round concert and exhibition venue to try and rival the NEC, then the doors to the Ricoh will be closed to the football club for good, and we will have all parties involved on all sides to thank for that IMHO. I guess we will find out PH4 proposals soon enough. Other than this I don't see any other options for the stadium that don't include a Coventry football club.
I take your point about sharing the Cov rugby ground as an alternative option, and though personally this would not be my preferred option of the two, I would go with this idea too, though I would be concerned about the state of the pitch with any ground sharing scheme. To me also playing at the Ricoh would be a greater symbol of ambition and intent which may in turn attract greater support.
As has been pointed out, it is probably too late to organise and register a team for this season anyway, and by the start of next season the future or otherwise of CCFC will hopefully be clearer, but at this stage I don't trust SISU to follow through with the declared plan of returning to a new stadium close to Coventry, and nor do I believe it would be achievable in three years taking into account planning considerations.
We will also find out soon enough whether all our protestations and petitioning have achieved anything, and maybe then the only option we then have left will be to consider our options for the years ahead and what continuing influence (losses greater than they have budgeted for by not attending home matches in Northampton, and future uncertainty for their franchise through the creation of a new club) we can try to bring to bear on SISU to return to Cov or sell up. The alternative would be to do nothing which surely would be destined to fail. That is why we should debate all options now, and in no way means we should give up on CCFC.
 
D

dadgad

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 11, 2013
  • #37
One thing :
Imagine a Cov v Cov derby match.
That'd be tasty.
 
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 11, 2013
  • #38
GT, that is one unholy wall of text.
 

skybluebal

New Member
  • Jul 11, 2013
  • #39
As a Cov ex-pat living in Surrey, its hard enough travelling up to home games and so I go to more away games (primarily the southern games) than home. Even if Northampton is actually nearer, I won't travel there ever! I'll continue to go to as many away games as I can.

If I still lived in Cov I'd rather support an existing team such as Coventry Phoenix. Its just wrong to set up another team that dilutes the total support. Cov Utd is just wrong, it sounds like another set of money men controlling a club rather than supporting what is already there - sound familiar
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 11, 2013
  • #40
ccfchandsy said:
What about Cov sphinx playing a few games at the Ricoh would get them more cash = better team = football league
Click to expand...

What's Sphinx's average attendance again? :faceaplm:

And 10k-15k CCFC fans made the Ricoh a 'soulless bowl'?

Here's a more accurate formula:

Sphinx at RICOH = 400k rent p/a = insufficient funds to pay for this rent = bankrupted club.
 
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 11, 2013
  • #41
stupot07 said:
To me setting a club up now is a breakaway not a Phoenix club, and if ccfc return within 3 years there will be a lot of time, effort and money wasted by setting up then disbanding a breakaway club.
Click to expand...

The real question becomes at what point do we consider the current club a complete lost cause that is beyond saving. In my book that happens with one of the following:

a) The club, in all forms, is liquidated and/or ceases to exist (lots of examples of phoenix clubs making it as high as League 2 from much smaller fanbases).

b) The groundshare becomes permanent and there is no chance of a return to Coventry (allowing for an AFC Wimbledon type scenario).

Until either scenario arises then any new club is not a phoenix but a protest club. However if it is to succeed it as such it needs the following:

1. A united group of supporters behind it with the club's purpose very clearly defined.

2. An investor or group of investors with the financial acumen to fund a football club to at least the upper echelons of non league football. Furthermore, if this is a protest club, they must be aware of any intent to potentially disband the club should it achieve its aims.

Without either of these things then there won't be enough finance behind the project to sustain it beyond an extremely low level of football. Equally, without united supporters and a clear aim, then the lack of cohesion and organisation will hold the new club back, phoenix or protest, and leave all involved wasting their time. It would however garner a hell of a lot more support and unity if there were no longer a CCFC to compete with.
 

BrisbaneBronco

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 11, 2013
  • #42
Undecided

What is going on in my mind at present is where will we be with SISU over the next 3-5 years.
I think either we will not exist or we will be at least 2 leagues lower, plus we would not return to Coventry. So is it best to cut all ties now.

As for a Phoenix club, if it meant starting at the bottom of the Football league pyramid, then forget it. But if there was a guarantee of starting at the top level of non league, because Haskell or someone else was bank rolling us and had purchased the Ricoh, then I am all for it.
 

CCFC_GT

New Member
  • Jul 11, 2013
  • #43
Brighton Sky Blue said:
GT, that is one unholy wall of text.
Click to expand...

Sorry BSB had to leave out your responses just to keep it down to the max 10,000 characters allowable
 
Last edited: Jul 11, 2013

mark82

Super Moderator
  • Jul 11, 2013
  • #44
BrisbaneBronco said:
Undecided

What is going on in my mind at present is where will we be with SISU over the next 3-5 years.
I think either we will not exist or we will be at least 2 leagues lower, plus we would not return to Coventry. So is it best to cut all ties now.

As for a Phoenix club, if it meant starting at the bottom of the Football league pyramid, then forget it. But if there was a guarantee of starting at the top level of non league, because Haskell or someone else was bank rolling us and had purchased the Ricoh, then I am all for it.
Click to expand...

Would not ever start at top of non league pyramid. Think best we could hope for would be Northern League. What's wrong with starting at the bottom though? Sounds a little snobby when people say things like that. If we didn't start at the very bottom it would be purely down to health & safety.
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 11, 2013
  • #45
I was under the impression a club started to replace one that has gone under would start 4 divisions lower. Things can have changed from then as the FL seem to do as they please. There is always a place somewhere as whichever division the club leaves relegate one less club. The same amount as usual gets promoted. It means there is a space in whatever division they decide to put a club into. It is not like starting a club from scratch without another one going under. There isn't a space for one.
 
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 11, 2013
  • #46
CCFC_GT said:
Sorry BSB had to leave out your responses just to keep it down to the max 10,000 characters allowable
Click to expand...

Not a problem
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 11, 2013
  • #47
Brighton Sky Blue said:
The real question becomes at what point do we consider the current club a complete lost cause that is beyond saving. In my book that happens with one of the following:

a) The club, in all forms, is liquidated and/or ceases to exist (lots of examples of phoenix clubs making it as high as League 2 from much smaller fanbases).

b) The groundshare becomes permanent and there is no chance of a return to Coventry (allowing for an AFC Wimbledon type scenario).

Until either scenario arises then any new club is not a phoenix but a protest club. However if it is to succeed it as such it needs the following:

1. A united group of supporters behind it with the club's purpose very clearly defined.

2. An investor or group of investors with the financial acumen to fund a football club to at least the upper echelons of non league football. Furthermore, if this is a protest club, they must be aware of any intent to potentially disband the club should it achieve its aims.

Without either of these things then there won't be enough finance behind the project to sustain it beyond an extremely low level of football. Equally, without united supporters and a clear aim, then the lack of cohesion and organisation will hold the new club back, phoenix or protest, and leave all involved wasting their time. It would however garner a hell of a lot more support and unity if there were no longer a CCFC to compete with.
Click to expand...

Bang on Brighton:

a) or b) hasn't happened yet therefore this would be a breakaway club not Phoenix.

1) fans are already very much divided on this 'breakaway club' idea

2) far more likely to happen if a) or b) occur with the setting up of a Phoenix club than through the current option of a breakaway club that may be disbanded in 3 years time.
 

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 11, 2013
  • #48
i voted no because CCFC is not dead!!!!!!

only in event of liquadation or permanent move should you change allegiances

imagine you started breakaway club then in 2-3 years cov are back at ricoh, waste of time

ccfc for me...for life...hence the username

only when ccfc dont exist should the phoenix rise.
 
C

Cityfan1

New Member
  • Jul 11, 2013
  • #49
No. Would no longer be my club. Probably go and watch Beduff Utd
 

mark82

Super Moderator
  • Jul 11, 2013
  • #50
Astute said:
I was under the impression a club started to replace one that has gone under would start 4 divisions lower. Things can have changed from then as the FL seem to do as they please. There is always a place somewhere as whichever division the club leaves relegate one less club. The same amount as usual gets promoted. It means there is a space in whatever division they decide to put a club into. It is not like starting a club from scratch without another one going under. There isn't a space for one.
Click to expand...

Think the rules changed a couple of years ago as there were a large number of reborn clubs. Will look up what the actual ruling is when I get chance.
 

ajsccfc

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 11, 2013
  • #51
Big no for me. The United and 1883 efforts just smack of cynically preying on emotions, and in Sphinx the city already has an non-league team close to the very centre of the city who could do with extra support. Far better them than NOTSISU AFC 1987
 
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 11, 2013
  • #52
stupot07 said:
Bang on Brighton:

a) or b) hasn't happened yet therefore this would be a breakaway club not Phoenix.

1) fans are already very much divided on this 'breakaway club' idea

2) far more likely to happen if a) or b) occur with the setting up of a Phoenix club than through the current option of a breakaway club that may be disbanded in 3 years time.
Click to expand...

The disagreement now rests over whether the current club is beyond saving or not-for some it already is. For others, myself included, it isn't over just yet.
 

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 11, 2013
  • #53
AFC Wimbledon are the template, only do it when required.

then you can get 100% fans on board, right now most cov fans will remain ccfc fans.
 

mark82

Super Moderator
  • Jul 11, 2013
  • #54
covcity4life said:
AFC Wimbledon are the template, only do it when required.

then you can get 100% fans on board, right now most cov fans will remain ccfc fans.
Click to expand...

Responses above suggest that nearly half of fans are ready for this now and a further 20% are on the fence. In fact only 1 in 3 are against it at the current time, that is the minority view - which is a surprise (although appreciate it is a very small sample).
 

mark82

Super Moderator
  • Jul 11, 2013
  • #55
ajsccfc said:
Big no for me. The United and 1883 efforts just smack of cynically preying on emotions, and in Sphinx the city already has an non-league team close to the very centre of the city who could do with extra support. Far better them than NOTSISU AFC 1987
Click to expand...

The 1883 (although that wouldn't be the name of the club) you mention though would be fan owned so everyone would have a stake. Not sure how that is praying on emotions, it is free choice.
 
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 11, 2013
  • #56
mark82 said:
Responses above suggest that nearly half of fans are ready for this now and a further 20% are on the fence. In fact only 1 in 3 are against it at the current time, that is the minority view - which is a surprise (although appreciate it is a very small sample).
Click to expand...

The difference between the 'yes' and 'no' options is less than 10%-not what we'd call an overwhelming majority.
 

ajsccfc

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 11, 2013
  • #57
Because these new clubs are all presented as the complete antithesis of what SISU do, at a time when people are most emotive about SISU (Coventry United seems the most cynical of all, the 1883 version may not be in the same realm). Sphinx aren't being run by evil tyrants from what I can gather, why not just get behind them?
 

mark82

Super Moderator
  • Jul 11, 2013
  • #58
Brighton Sky Blue said:
The difference between the 'yes' and 'no' options is less than 10%-not what we'd call an overwhelming majority.
Click to expand...

Agree. In fact it isn't a majority as under 50%, but still surprises me that it is the leading option.
 
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 11, 2013
  • #59
mark82 said:
Agree. In fact it isn't a majority as under 50%, but still surprises me that it is the leading option.
Click to expand...

The sample size isn't really big enough to be representative to be fair-you need at least 500-1000 for it to point to anything in my view.
 

mark82

Super Moderator
  • Jul 11, 2013
  • #60
ajsccfc said:
Because these new clubs are all presented as the complete antithesis of what SISU do, at a time when people are most emotive about SISU (Coventry United seems the most cynical of all, the 1883 version may not be in the same realm). Sphinx aren't being run by evil tyrants from what I can gather, why not just get behind them?
Click to expand...

They (Sphinx) are not representative of CCFC fans. A new CCFC fan owned club would be. Surely even you can see the difference despite what your views on it are?
 

mark82

Super Moderator
  • Jul 11, 2013
  • #61
Brighton Sky Blue said:
The sample size isn't really big enough to be representative to be fair-you need at least 500-1000 for it to point to anything in my view.
Click to expand...

I did make that point above. Unfortunately you will never get that sample size on a forum.
 

ajsccfc

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 11, 2013
  • #62
mark82 said:
They (Sphinx) are not representative of CCFC fans. A new CCFC fan owned club would be. Surely even you can see the difference despite what your views on it are?
Click to expand...

I get the idea, but I don't see it as workable. Sphinx are a football team playing in and for the city, which is about as catch-all representative as you can hope. With nearly everything else there is disagreement (look for instance at how many people have already declared the club dead).
 
B

beduth

New Member
  • Jul 11, 2013
  • #63
Otis said:
This is another question that is not black and white.


IF we play in Northampton and STAY in Northampton for 3 years plus, then the answer is yes.

I can't just support a new club though if everything is up in the air and we may or may not be coming back to the Ricoh.
Click to expand...
I think we will be out of Cov for at least five years .
 
A

andyboy81

New Member
  • Jul 11, 2013
  • #64
Can you stop refering to it as Phoenix Club ..... All I keep hearing is Brian Potter saying "Pull off into paradise"
 

mark82

Super Moderator
  • Jul 11, 2013
  • #65
andyboy81 said:
Can you stop refering to it as Phoenix Club ..... All I keep hearing is Brian Potter saying "Pull off into paradise"
Click to expand...

Brian Potter could be the mascot.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?