Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Boro (50 Viewers)

  • Thread starter edgy
  • Start date Yesterday at 11:13 PM
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 2 of 4 Next Last

Shannerz

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 8:21 AM
  • #36
Brighton Sky Blue said:
CCFC away at Deepdale however….that really is a curse.
Click to expand...
It isn't. There's clearly some psychology going on there, but in recent years, it's mostly been that they play a brand of physical football that our teams have generally struggled against.

This year, we just let them off the hook, and it was extremely frustrating.

It's really boring that we never win there, but there's nothing supernatural about it.
 
Reactions: MaltaSkyBlue and HuckerbyDublinWhelan

Sky Blue Harry H

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 8:22 AM
  • #37
Brighton Sky Blue said:
I don’t actually think the sit deep and hit on the break approach is the way to go against sides like this. They’ll move the ball too quickly for you to get players in position and sit tight. You have to fight fire with fire.
Click to expand...
Agree with that, unless your forward (s) have got the defenders number in terms of pace and physicality (which is where Ayling came unstuck). The other centre back is a big lad, who can play a bit, so I think Boro thought they were safe in that respect, but it backfired last night. We pressed brilliantly in the first half, but I said after about 20 mins that we'd struggle to do that for 90 mins. Well played, and not what I was expecting last night (but hoping for!)
 
K

Kris_Boro

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 8:41 AM
  • #38
Some balanced views.

The difference between Hellberg and Carrick is the defensive side. Granted last night wasn/t great defensively, on the whole its worlds apart. Ayling has stepped into the middle when both Fry and Jones (Our best defender) got injured. Most teams sit back against us so Ayling's ability on the ball has been very important and Malanda looks a real player. Last night, Fry would have been better than Ayling but i can understand why Hellberg stuck with him, why change anything from a team on a six game winning streak but he will learn from last night.

Our midfield is our strength but i thought you did a great job at shutting down, especially first half. We still had some great chances but poor finishing. I think most Boro fans had hoped for a striker in January. Conway, is excellent in overall play. Last night i dont think he was the same after he took a knock but he is not a clinical finisher and last night was a game where that was needed but goals have not been an issue of late.

Im confident we will bounce back.
 
Reactions: CCFCSteve, Ipad Boro, lifeskyblue and 3 others

rob9872

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 8:42 AM
  • #39
Ayling is a prick. To see him try to start shithousing roughing up the penalty spot, tells you all you need to know about his footballing ability. Pound shop Robbie Savage.
 
Reactions: MaltaSkyBlue, robbiethemole, SkyBlue_Bear83 and 2 others

Ccfcisparks

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 8:43 AM
  • #40
Kris_Boro said:
Some balanced views.

The difference between Hellberg and Carrick is the defensive side. Granted last night was great defensively, on the whole its worlds apart. Ayling has stepped into the middle when both Fry and Jones (Our best defender) got injured. Most teams sit back against us so Ayling's ability on the ball has been very important and Malanda looks a real player. Last night, Fry would have been better than Ayling but i can understand why Hellberg stuck with him, why change anything from a team on a six game winning streak but he will learn from last night.

Our midfield is our strength but i thought you did a great job at shutting down, especially first half. We still had some great chances but poor finishing. I think most Boro fans had hoped for a striker in January. Conway, is excellent in overall play. Last night i dont think he was the same after he took a knock but he is not a clinical finisher and last night was a game where that was needed but goals have not been an issue of late.

Im confident we will bounce back.
Click to expand...
ok
 

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 8:43 AM
  • #41
rob9872 said:
Ayling is a prick. To see him try to start shithousing roughing up the penalty spot, tells you all you need to know about his footballing ability. Pound shop Robbie Savage.
Click to expand...
He's a good player though and could achieve promotion to prem with 2 different teams
 

rob9872

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 8:49 AM
  • #42
covcity4life said:
He's a good player though and could achieve promotion to prem with 2 different teams
Click to expand...
I think i have an irrational dislike of all footballers with long hair unless they play for Cov.
 
Reactions: Ipad Boro and covcity4life

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 8:49 AM
  • #43
covcity4life said:
He's a good player though and could achieve promotion to prem with 2 different teams
Click to expand...
was a good player
 
Reactions: edgy

JSL

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 8:57 AM
  • #44
covcity4life said:
He's a good player though and could achieve promotion to prem with 2 different teams
Click to expand...
Being dim, but how / why unless you mean a promoted team buys him in the summer?
 

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 8:59 AM
  • #45
edgy said:
Excellent midfield but not much elsewhere. Their forward line isn't great.

Also been reading how this Hellberg and his coaches are far superior to our lot. No they aren't. They are just blessed with that excellent midfield.
Click to expand...
Thought they played good football , its only because we are so well drilled that we won that , you can see why they do well
 
Reactions: Skyblueweeman, CCFCSteve, Ipad Boro and 2 others

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 9:00 AM
  • #46
JSL said:
Being dim, but how / why unless you mean a promoted team buys him in the summer?
Click to expand...
I mean he's previously been promoted with leeds
 

edgy

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 9:07 AM
  • #47
Evo1883 said:
Thought they played good football , its only because we are so well drilled that we won that , you can see why they do well
Click to expand...

I agree. Some of their interchanges in midfield were exceptional. But it didnt really get them anywhere, as their forwards are average and if it went back to a defender they looked harrassed by our great work ethic.
 
Reactions: Evo1883

shepardo01

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 9:09 AM
  • #48
Boro's next two;
H Oxford
H Leicester
 
Reactions: Evo1883
S

SkyB

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 9:13 AM
  • #49
Love how we played Malanda and Ayling; Haji, Simms and EMC being physical with the pair all night really dragged them in deep last night and they drowned.
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 9:14 AM
  • #50
shepardo01 said:
Boro's next two;
H Oxford
H Leicester
Click to expand...
Leicester if they actually try can quite easily beat them
 
Reactions: shepardo01

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 9:15 AM
  • #51
SkyB said:
Love how we played Malanda and Ayling; Haji, Simms and EMC being physical with the pair all night really dragged them in deep last night and they drowned.
Click to expand...
Malanda was meant to be the new VVD or so they said. As you sad once we could physical and pressed them higher they were very meh.
 
Reactions: SBAndy

Ipad Boro

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 9:29 AM
  • #52
edgy said:
Come on mate. Hoodoos arent an actual thing. It's a mentality and ultimately an excuse.

As stated you have an excellent midfield. If Hellberg was that brilliant, how come he couldn't prepare your team for anything remotely aggressive or physically? How come he couldn't change your game plan early?

Everyone knows (apparently) that to get success against us, you sit back and allow us to dictate and then hit us on the break over our full backs. But Hellberg didn't do that, or even change it when the game was getting away from you.

I get it, you were on the crest of a wave and everything was roses etc. But saying you expect to win most games is dangerous talk, we did exactly the same and look how that turned out for the last month or two. But like Lampard has just shown, it didn't seem to me that you had a plan B. The league will have seen that and I suspect most teams will now try to replicate that aggression and physicality against you. Let's see how Hellberg actually does over the course of a full season.
Click to expand...
He won't get a full season with pre-season etc until next one obviously, whatever league we're in. I take your point about judging him over a full season mind as Carrick was brilliant for us for half a season (though in his defence he did have the mother of injury lists for a few years) and he was the ultimate example of a manager who is too inflexible.

You're right about the physicality element, unfortunately whilst we're very skillful, we don't have many big lads, so I imagine given a pre-season, he'd recruit a few "Tony Pulis" type players to bring on should we need them against the sides who like to mix it up a bit. I do fear it's a side of our game that's lacking and it's a learning curve after all. In a way with our current players unfortunately we don't have sufficient personel to be able to muscle and ram our way through games so there was less Hellberg could do, other than change shape and make subs with different skillsets which tbf to him did show, up until the penalty. It's not that Hellberg doesn't have a Plan B, he's highly reactive, but the players we need in a blood and thunder barging off the ball game are limited and it's blatent we're lacking height for the long balls game. You could logically level some blame at recruitment there, but less at Kim himself.

As for expecting to win most games, that's simply where the bar has been set. We're creatures of habit, expect to win where results thus far dictate we're likely to, expect to lose the Hoodoos as obviously those results dictate the opposite.

As for Hoodoos not being an actual thing...How else would you explain 7 losses on the bounce home and away with different mangers, different form, different players and different league standings at the time? Coincidence only goes so far until it's improbable. How else would you explain your never having won at Deepdale or 20 years of hurt against Norwich? It's why I've been saying for ages on here that we were likely to lose this game, though it was seen as ridiculous by a lot.

I get that they might be part mental blocks etc, as they do weigh on the mind somewhat. But they exist mate, and the proof is right in front of you. Denying their existence only risks more pain in the long run. And if the miracle happens and they eventually get broken it's like winning a cup.
 
Reactions: lifeskyblue and shepardo01
H

HuckerbyDublinWhelan

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 9:38 AM
  • #53
Kris_Boro said:
Some balanced views.

The difference between Hellberg and Carrick is the defensive side. Granted last night wasn/t great defensively, on the whole its worlds apart. Ayling has stepped into the middle when both Fry and Jones (Our best defender) got injured. Most teams sit back against us so Ayling's ability on the ball has been very important and Malanda looks a real player. Last night, Fry would have been better than Ayling but i can understand why Hellberg stuck with him, why change anything from a team on a six game winning streak but he will learn from last night.

Our midfield is our strength but i thought you did a great job at shutting down, especially first half. We still had some great chances but poor finishing. I think most Boro fans had hoped for a striker in January. Conway, is excellent in overall play. Last night i dont think he was the same after he took a knock but he is not a clinical finisher and last night was a game where that was needed but goals have not been an issue of late.

Im confident we will bounce back.
Click to expand...
i thought it was clear why you've won so many games. in some respects i think the confidence played into our hands. You opened the game up and that sort of benefits us. Your passing was quicker and slick, but to Lampard's credit i thought he went more direct and more physical.

I'm confident if we both play like we did last night for the rest of the season - we'll both be top 2.

That being said, West Brom will play differently than you and cause us more problems unfortunately. We’ll see what we’re like against 11 men back
 
Reactions: Skyblueweeman, Kris_Boro and Ipad Boro

alexccfc99

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 9:40 AM
  • #54
They knock it round really well - I thought they were as good as Ipswich, we just also turned up last night as opposed to the Ipswich game(s), but I think they lack a centre forward and their goalie is a weak link

They were in for Adam Armstrong late Jan before he opted for Wolves and if they do not go up automatically I think that could prove very costly for them
 

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 9:42 AM
  • #55
edgy said:
Come on mate. Hoodoos arent an actual thing. It's a mentality and ultimately an excuse.

As stated you have an excellent midfield. If Hellberg was that brilliant, how come he couldn't prepare your team for anything remotely aggressive or physically? How come he couldn't change your game plan early?

Everyone knows (apparently) that to get success against us, you sit back and allow us to dictate and then hit us on the break over our full backs. But Hellberg didn't do that, or even change it when the game was getting away from you.

I get it, you were on the crest of a wave and everything was roses etc. But saying you expect to win most games is dangerous talk, we did exactly the same and look how that turned out for the last month or two. But like Lampard has just shown, it didn't seem to me that you had a plan B. The league will have seen that and I suspect most teams will now try to replicate that aggression and physicality against you. Let's see how Hellberg actually does over the course of a full season.
Click to expand...
Laughs in preston
 

shepardo01

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 9:45 AM
  • #56
Ipad Boro said:
He won't get a full season with pre-season etc until next one obviously, whatever league we're in. I take your point about judging him over a full season mind as Carrick was brilliant for us for half a season (though in his defence he did have the mother of injury lists for a few years) and he was the ultimate example of a manager who is too inflexible.

You're right about the physicality element, unfortunately whilst we're very skillful, we don't have many big lads, so I imagine given a pre-season, he'd recruit a few "Tony Pulis" type players to bring on should we need them against the sides who like to mix it up a bit. I do fear it's a side of our game that's lacking and it's a learning curve after all. In a way with our current players unfortunately we don't have sufficient personel to be able to muscle and ram our way through games so there was less Hellberg could do, other than change shape and make subs with different skillsets which tbf to him did show, up until the penalty. It's not that Hellberg doesn't have a Plan B, he's highly reactive, but the players we need in a blood and thunder barging off the ball game are limited and it's blatent we're lacking height for the long balls game. You could logically level some blame at recruitment there, but less at Kim himself.

As for expecting to win most games, that's simply where the bar has been set. We're creatures of habit, expect to win where results thus far dictate we're likely to, expect to lose the Hoodoos as obviously those results dictate the opposite.

As for Hoodoos not being an actual thing...How else would you explain 7 losses on the bounce home and away with different mangers, different form, different players and different league standings at the time? Coincidence only goes so far until it's improbable. How else would you explain your never having won at Deepdale or 20 years of hurt against Norwich? It's why I've been saying for ages on here that we were likely to lose this game, though it was seen as ridiculous by a lot.

I get that they might be part mental blocks etc, as they do weigh on the mind somewhat. But they exist mate, and the proof is right in front of you. Denying their existence only risks more pain in the long run. And if the miracle happens and they eventually get broken it's like winning a cup.
Click to expand...
I've appreciated and respected your posts on here mate.
Very balanced and fair. Thanks for adding value.

From what I saw last night, you have every right to believe you'll win most games.

The confidence you lots have on the ball is excellent, and you have the ability to move up the pitch quickly with a few quick/clever passes.

We just didn't give you the opportunity to get quality shots off.

After seeing you lot live I really think you will be in the top two.

Just hope between us, we keep Ipswich out of it.

If we do, I think (and this is the first time I have put it out there!) we'll both go up. (Provided we start to turn up away from home!)
 
Reactions: Ipad Boro

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 10:03 AM
  • #57
shepardo01 said:
I've appreciated and respected your posts on here mate.
Very balanced and fair. Thanks for adding value.

From what I saw last night, you have every right to believe you'll win most games.

The confidence you lots have on the ball is excellent, and you have the ability to move up the pitch quickly with a few quick/clever passes.

We just didn't give you the opportunity to get quality shots off.

After seeing you lot live I really think you will be in the top two.

Just hope between us, we keep Ipswich out of it.

If we do, I think (and this is the first time I have put it out there!) we'll both go up. (Provided we start to turn up away from home!)
Click to expand...
I think Ipswich will overtake them, genuinely do. They are far too open at the back and if teams as we did press them high they'll cough up chances.
 

TomRad85

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 10:06 AM
  • #58
David O'Day said:
I think Ipswich will overtake them, genuinely do. They are far too open at the back and if teams as we did press them high they'll cough up chances.
Click to expand...
If i was Ipswich i'd be starting to get concerned again if we win at WBA. Think they were relying on us dropping off and there seems to be an expectation they will win their games in hand but i'll bet good money they don't win them both. Points on the board will always be king.
 
Reactions: robbiethemole and Ipad Boro
S

SonofErnie

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 10:12 AM
  • #59
TomRad85 said:
If i was Ipswich i'd be starting to get concerned again if we win at WBA. Think they were relying on us dropping off and there seems to be an expectation they will win their games in hand but i'll bet good money they don't win them both. Points on the board will always be king.
Click to expand...
A win for us Saturday lunchtime could be massive. It puts pressure on Ipswich and Hull, both with 2 games before we play again on Wednesday evening.
 
Reactions: TomRad85

torchomatic

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 10:16 AM
  • #60
PVA said:
Hackney is a step above anyone in the league and McGree is a good player. Malanda looks excellent in defence.

But Conway is bang average and the keeper is shite.
Click to expand...

He is, but he also has an issue with his temperament, which might be his undoing.
 

SkyBlue_Bear83

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 10:25 AM
  • #61
Ipad Boro said:
As you say midfield is our strongest area, it dominates the league so Lampard did well to employ a succession of long punts from your half to a big lad, bypassing it.

We're actually very decent in defence too, but I feel it was was the wrong game to play Ayling in. He's 34 and has played every game this season so could do with a rest and Fry should have came in as he's bigger and better at dealing with long balls, barging and physicality which is a key part of your game so we'd have done well to include him.

Strikers...yeah, we could have done with getting an out and out poacher tbh. We don't tend to set up with strikers as our main goal threat so will feel it less than most, but it would have been ideal to bring one on in a game like tonight.

In terms of keepers, Bryn is ok, but he's not on Rushworth's level.

Hellball has been a revelation for us mind you. It's just you're never going to see it in any real full effect against yourselves for the same reason that you could play mediocre to good 5 times previously and have 1 absolutely awesome game against us..because Hoodoo. It therefore follows that our performance levels will drop, again because Hoodoo.

Against other decent sides such as the Blades obviously no Hoodoo exists so we were able to dominate to do the double over them no matter how well they played, which they did at theirs to give them credit. Against Ipswich whikst not guaranteed, we're also 3 or 4 times more likely to do the double over them than we were to get a single point off you. The reverse being true obviously for yourselves.

It remains that we've accumulated more points in the league than any other side since Hellberg rocked up, so it's doing him an injustice to claim that his methods aren't decent. A side with merely a good midfield and nothing else going for it including poor tactics racking up those kind of returns would be impossible and would render the entire league crap by comparison if that were the case. including yourselves. Which as both you and a clutch of other sides clearly aren't crap kind of refuses that theory.

Our PPG since he arrived and including tonight's result AND our christmas slump, expanded to a whole season would see us rack up 95 points plus. We may not get that high, but considering that, our manager's methods are certainly not slacking. And we only have 1 of our 4 Hoodoo games left to play. Other than that of course we expect to win most games.
Click to expand...
Shit back handed compliment and sly digs about our style. Funny that came out after we beat you.
 
Reactions: robbiethemole

Ipad Boro

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 10:29 AM
  • #62
shepardo01 said:
I've appreciated and respected your posts on here mate.
Very balanced and fair. Thanks for adding value.

From what I saw last night, you have every right to believe you'll win most games.

The confidence you lots have on the ball is excellent, and you have the ability to move up the pitch quickly with a few quick/clever passes.

We just didn't give you the opportunity to get quality shots off.

After seeing you lot live I really think you will be in the top two.

Just hope between us, we keep Ipswich out of it.

If we do, I think (and this is the first time I have put it out there!) we'll both go up. (Provided we start to turn up away from home!)
Click to expand...
Thanks mate.

Know what you mean, I don't want to rule Hull & Millwall out of it either, for right there is a potential path to pain!

But I do feel that Ipswich will finish above them, so therefore if Hull or Millwall somehow managed the not easy task of overhauling either of us, I think Ipswich will have done so first. Anyone who finishes above the Tractors would very likely be promoted IMHO.
 
Reactions: shepardo01 and torchomatic

SKYBLUES90

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 10:30 AM
  • #63
Ipad Boro said:
As you say midfield is our strongest area, it dominates the league so Lampard did well to employ a succession of long punts from your half to a big lad, bypassing it.

We're actually very decent in defence too, but I feel it was was the wrong game to play Ayling in. He's 34 and has played every game this season so could do with a rest and Fry should have came in as he's bigger and better at dealing with long balls, barging and physicality which is a key part of your game so we'd have done well to include him.

Strikers...yeah, we could have done with getting an out and out poacher tbh. We don't tend to set up with strikers as our main goal threat so will feel it less than most, but it would have been ideal to bring one on in a game like tonight.

In terms of keepers, Bryn is ok, but he's not on Rushworth's level.

Hellball has been a revelation for us mind you. It's just you're never going to see it in any real full effect against yourselves for the same reason that you could play mediocre to good 5 times previously and have 1 absolutely awesome game against us..because Hoodoo. It therefore follows that our performance levels will drop, again because Hoodoo.

Against other decent sides such as the Blades obviously no Hoodoo exists so we were able to dominate to do the double over them no matter how well they played, which they did at theirs to give them credit. Against Ipswich whikst not guaranteed, we're also 3 or 4 times more likely to do the double over them than we were to get a single point off you. The reverse being true obviously for yourselves.

It remains that we've accumulated more points in the league than any other side since Hellberg rocked up, so it's doing him an injustice to claim that his methods aren't decent. A side with merely a good midfield and nothing else going for it including poor tactics racking up those kind of returns would be impossible and would render the entire league crap by comparison if that were the case. including yourselves. Which as both you and a clutch of other sides clearly aren't crap kind of refuses that theory.

Our PPG since he arrived and including tonight's result AND our christmas slump, expanded to a whole season would see us rack up 95 points plus. We may not get that high, but considering that, our manager's methods are certainly not slacking. And we only have 1 of our 4 Hoodoo games left to play. Other than that of course we expect to win most games.
Click to expand...

Hoodoo!? What a fucking load of nonsense.

Your players didn’t fancy it last night, that’s all.
 

Shannerz

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 10:35 AM
  • #64
Ipad Boro said:
As for Hoodoos not being an actual thing...How else would you explain 7 losses on the bounce home and away with different mangers.
Click to expand...
Because we've been tactically more astute, more clinical, showed more desire, and just generally been better than you in those games.

We haven't had '20 years of hurt' against Norwich. Most of that time we weren't in the same division, and for a lot of the time that we were, they just had a better team with better players than us.

Preston: we're generally shit, or certainly were shit under Robins, against teams that bully us.

I get football fans are superstitious in the face of reason, but really, you know it's bollocks, right? Do you believe in your lucky pants, too?
 

Ipad Boro

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 10:35 AM
  • #65
SkyBlue_Bear83 said:
Shit back handed compliment and sly digs about our style. Funny that came out after we beat you.
Click to expand...
It's not a back-handed compliment at all "about your style" as your style for the first half of the season was very different.

It's just finding different ways to play, which you needed to do and did so.
 
Reactions: clint van damme

Ccfcisparks

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 10:35 AM
  • #66
SKYBLUES90 said:
Hoodoo!? What a fucking load of nonsense.

Your players didn’t fancy it last night, that’s all.
Click to expand...
Right! The notion that the hoodoo played a factor in us winning is not giving us our dues.

Lampard out thought Hellberg and our players out played theirs. I'm not sure why its hard to say that.

Part of me thought it was tongue in cheek to start with but the fact its mentioned in every post suggests not.
 

Ipad Boro

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 10:35 AM
  • #67
SkyBlue_Bear83 said:
Shit back handed compliment and sly digs about our style. Funny that came out after we beat you.
Click to expand...
It's not a back-handed compliment at all "about your style" as your style for the first half of the season was very different.
It's just finding different ways to play, which you needed to do and did so.
 
Reactions: shepardo01 and torchomatic

torchomatic

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 10:36 AM
  • #68
Ipad Boro said:
Thanks mate.

Know what you mean, I don't want to rule Hull & Millwall out of it either, for right there is a potential path to pain!

But I do feel that Ipswich will finish above them, so therefore if Hull or Millwall somehow managed the not easy task of overhauling either of us, I think Ipswich will have done so first. Anyone who finishes above the Tractors would very likely be promoted IMHO.
Click to expand...

As I've said many times, I'm really not bothered whether we finish first or second, just keep ahead of that chasing pack. I have a soft spot for Boro, not just because we always beat you, I just think we are similar sized clubs with similar fan bases.

It's annoying that I now have to worry about Hull, Millwall and Ipswich, but realistically it is probably just Ipswich who will have the squad depth and the nous to snatch an auto spot from either one of us.

Here's hoping we'll both be celebrating come the end (or even mid) April.
 
Reactions: Ipad Boro and shepardo01

torchomatic

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 10:38 AM
  • #69
Ipad Boro said:
It's not a back-handed compliment at all "about your style" as your style for the first half of the season was very different.
It's just finding different ways to play, which you needed to do and did so.
Click to expand...

Although the clitoris has ten thousand nerve endings, it is still not as sensitive as a Coventry City supporter!
 
Reactions: Skyblueweeman

procdoc

Well-Known Member
  • Today at 10:39 AM
  • #70
PVA said:
Hackney is a step above anyone in the league and McGree is a good player. Malanda looks excellent in defence.

But Conway is bang average and the keeper is shite.
Click to expand...
Hackney is a bit overrated
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 2 of 4 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

  • Wyken Sky BlueA moment ago
  • CCFCSteveA moment ago
  • JPG771 minute ago
  • Paul W2 minutes ago
  • Sky Blue M2 minutes ago
  • TomRad854 minutes ago
  • Skybluekyle4 minutes ago
  • ovduk784 minutes ago
  • castellon_skyblue4 minutes ago
  • SkyBlue_Bear834 minutes ago
  • SkyBlueZack5 minutes ago
  • Potbellypig5 minutes ago
  • SKYBLUES906 minutes ago
  • alan30036 minutes ago
  • ChrisPBacon6 minutes ago
  • Tracey19986 minutes ago
  • montydon877 minutes ago
  • Seamus17 minutes ago
  • olderskyblue8 minutes ago
  • Macca198710 minutes ago
  • SonofErnie10 minutes ago
  • Cranfield Sky Blue10 minutes ago
  • skybluesd10 minutes ago
  • Herb7011 minutes ago
  • edgy11 minutes ago
  • Sheffield Sky Blue11 minutes ago
  • KenilworthSkyBlue13 minutes ago
  • djbooth14 minutes ago
  • Sil14 minutes ago
  • ... and 3 more.
  • Total: 48 (members: 32, guests: 16)
    Share:
    Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
    • Home
    • Forums
    • Coventry City Football Club
    • Coventry City General Chat
    • Default Style
    • Contact us
    • Terms and rules
    • Privacy policy
    • Help
    • Home
    Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
    Menu
    Log in

    Register

    • Home
    • Forums
      • New posts
      • Search forums
    • What's new
      • New posts
      • Latest activity
    • Members
      • Current visitors
    • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
    X

    Privacy & Transparency

    We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

    • Personalized ads and content
    • Content measurement and audience insights

    Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

    X

    Privacy & Transparency

    We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

    • Personalized ads and content
    • Content measurement and audience insights

    Do you accept cookies and these technologies?