fernandopartridge
Well-Known Member
Anything other than the vinegar strokes and you're a SISU apologist.
Anything other than the vinegar strokes and you're a SISU apologist.
I honestly can't see anything though. I can see a "There is no documentation our client can find that records transfer of assets in 1995"... while then showing assets transferred in 1995.
Not sure in itself it proves anything mind you. This is also 7 months ago, so maybe they found the documentation just as Ainsworth did! It does say investigations are ongoing, after all.
I have read this whole thread but no one is coming up with a valid explanation as to why these documents will help us now? What's Bob Ainsworth hoping to achieve in all this, is he trying to oust SISU or helping the club return to the Ricoh? Because I can't see how he is going to achieve it.
We are not Bob. Maybe ask him? What does it matter anyway? He is trying something at least.
I applaud him for that, however what do we know with all due respect what he is trying to do, how do we know it will benefit the club or the future of it?
We don't know if anything we can do will benefit our club and it's future. But does this mean that none of us should try anything to help as we don't know for sure?
That's not something I said or implied as you can see from the first part of the post you quoted, I appluad what Bob Ainsworth is trying to do even though the motive isn't clear and I hope he is successful, but what does he expect the result to be?
In other words if you went through all this what would you be looking to achieve?
are you going to the protest outside the council house today? If so what do you hope to achieve?
If not - shut the fuck up, and appreciate other people are trying different things.
That's not something I said or implied as you can see from the first part of the post you quoted, I appluad what Bob Ainsworth is trying to do even though the motive isn't clear and I hope he is successful, but what does he expect the result to be?
In other words if you went through all this what would you be looking to achieve?
Ideally I would want it to be shown that SISU transferred the assets illegally from Ltd to Holdings.
I would want the law to move those assets back.
I would want the administrator to restart the process with the assets known and in Ltd.
I would want someone in favour with ACL to buy Ltd and the Ricoh Arena.
I would want someone at SISU to be accountable in law for the deception.
I would want the FL to transfer the golden share back to Ltd and award the 10 points deducted back to the club.
I see BA as the start of this process but someone needs to take up the Gauntlet .........
.........I want world peace, too win the lottery, ........... KNOCK KNOCK ......... got to go I have a policeman and a doctor at the door.
are you going to the protest outside the council house today? If so what do you hope to achieve?
If not - shut the fuck up, and appreciate other people are trying different things.
Yes, the trust may finally have been provided with the smoking gun, lets see how smart they are in terms of how these can be deployed
That's not something I said or implied as you can see from the first part of the post you quoted, I appluad what Bob Ainsworth is trying to do even though the motive isn't clear and I hope he is successful, but what does he expect the result to be?
In other words if you went through all this what would you be looking to achieve?
hopefully we will know more come 4.30pm, thats when his parlimentry discusion is due to finish and the cats out of the bag.
Maybe he can pull a rabbit out the hat at the same time
or even better saw joy diversion in half
hopefully we will know more come 4.30pm, thats when his parlimentry discusion is due to finish and the cats out of the bag.
Their letter does say for the past 5 years (as far back as investigations had gone at that point) everything was registered in Holdings.
Really not sure there's any smoking gun there. It is, as you'd expect, a letter full of vaguaries and caveats to offer ways out.
It also says that Fisher & Co, after a diligent search, could find no documentation to support that transfer of assets from Holdings to Limited took place in 1995 and then it appears out of the blue after all! No smoking gun eh?
It also says that Fisher & Co, after a diligent search, could find no documentation to support that transfer of assets from Holdings to Limited took place in 1995 and then it appears out of the blue after all! No smoking gun eh?
Hence why I asked the question about whether these documents were originals?
Where did Bob get them?
Have they been deliberately held back by somebody formerly involved with the club?
A televised recording of Westminster Hall debates of 22 October is on the BBC Parliament channel on Saturday 26th at 6am.
Thanks don't know why I didn't think to pick up the phone and have a chat with him, I am sure he won't mind.
It matters because if you are doing anything in life their has to be motive, what's the motive?
I applaud him for that, however what do we know with all due respect what he is trying to do, how do we know it will benefit the club or the future of it?
Assuming you're a constituent I'd imagine he'd pick up the call.
I hate this automatica assumption that all politicians must be lying. Bob is a decent guy and has CCFC at heart, he's also working on direction from his constituents here. Unless you have evidence of something else, I'd say that your baseless suspicion is harmful more than helpful.
Ah that would make sense. Would love to have seen the look on their face if they ever tried to realise £5.7m from that lot.
Is that normal practice to secure loans with specific players or is this more of Richardson's dodgy transfer dealing?
I wouldn't have thought this loan was something the charity commission would be that keen on. So I would suspect that this was done to satisfy them that the money wasn't being lent unsecured, rather than anything dodgy with BR. Could be wrong though as my understanding of these things is very basic at best.
Would there be anyone still at the club and would have access to this kind of thing who is not in someway tied to SISU? If there's not and it's someone no longer there it makes me wonder why they felt the need to retain copies, the only reason I can think of is that they suspected something wasn't quite right long before we went into administration.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?