Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Bassala (4 Viewers)

  • Thread starter stevefloyd
  • Start date Jan 25, 2016
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last

87mint

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 26, 2016
  • #36
Tudgay was far and away our best player at Southend for the 45 minutes he was on the pitch so I think it would be seriously unfair to place two yoof teamers ahead of him. Also, he's barely played of late so to say he's offering nothing is absurd. He's offering all you can offer from the sidelines.
 

mechaishida

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 27, 2016
  • #37
Brylowes said:
You say that but TM obviously doesn't think so & he sees them in training all the time. If he thought either one of them was ready, he would surely pick them no.
Click to expand...

Well, it's time he took the MAF-tinted goggs off, methinks. Tudgay is underused and I wouldn't be surprised if he retired.

Youth is the way forward, and the hunger of our two young forwards should make a difference.
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Jan 27, 2016
  • #38
87mint said:
Tudgay was far and away our best player at Southend for the 45 minutes he was on the pitch so I think it would be seriously unfair to place two yoof teamers ahead of him. Also, he's barely played of late so to say he's offering nothing is absurd. He's offering all you can offer from the sidelines.
Click to expand...

Can't comment on Saturday but whenever I have seen him come on for little bits this season he has always done what he has had to. It is usually winning headers, holding the ball up and laying it off and then running into the box!
 

mechaishida

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 27, 2016
  • #39
Nick said:
Can't comment on Saturday but whenever I have seen him come on for little bits this season he has always done what he has had to. It is usually winning headers, holding the ball up and laying it off and then running into the box!
Click to expand...

Yep, he does what it says on the tin, so to speak. He's a useful player, either as a striker or a second striker, good in the air and strong on the ball. Shame TM has nearly no confidence in him.

We still need a nasty bastard up front though, a real bundle of horribleness, like a Dean Windass-type forward or a...*cough* Leon Clarke...
 
S

SkyBlueScottie

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 27, 2016
  • #40
Armstrong has come from a youth team of a premiership outfit, we have a lad who is in a youth team of a 3rd division outfit, do you not think there will be a slight bit of difference in terms of talent?
 

mechaishida

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 27, 2016
  • #41
SkyBlueScottie said:
Armstrong has come from a youth team of a premiership outfit, we have a lad who is in a youth team of a 3rd division outfit, do you not think there will be a slight bit of difference in terms of talent?
Click to expand...

Is Maddison applicable to that logic?

Talent is talent, doesn't matter what Division it hails from. Who's to say Sambou isn't a future goal-scoring regular?
 

Hobo

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 27, 2016
  • #42
mechaishida said:
Is Maddison applicable to that logic?

Talent is talent, doesn't matter what Division it hails from. Who's to say Sambou isn't a future goal-scoring regular?
Click to expand...

Well considering Mowbrey has been prepared to play the likes of Stokes, Armstrong, Murphy, Maddison and Kent....you would think he is pretty capable of deciding when somebody is ready.
 
S

SkyBlueScottie

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 27, 2016
  • #43
mechaishida said:
Is Maddison applicable to that logic?

Talent is talent, doesn't matter what Division it hails from. Who's to say Sambou isn't a future goal-scoring regular?
Click to expand...

No, Maddison is good enough, Mowbray and his staff deem Bassala as not good enough yet... So simply stating he is worth a go, what have we got to lose, he is the same age as Armstrong etc is not good enough. I would hope that a bit more thought goes into our play and squad.
 

mechaishida

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 27, 2016
  • #44
SkyBlueScottie said:
No, Maddison is good enough, Mowbray and his staff deem Bassala as not good enough yet... So simply stating he is worth a go, what have we got to lose, he is the same age as Armstrong etc is not good enough. I would hope that a bit more thought goes into our play and squad.
Click to expand...

I guess my own mentality of youth over bench-warming contract-sitters isn't applicable. Point taken.
 

stevefloyd

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 27, 2016
  • #45
As I have stated would you rather bring on Maf or an unknown in Sambou...it may not work same as Maf but equally it may just work as a stop gap before TM identifies another striker to bring in
 

mechaishida

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 27, 2016
  • #46
stevefloyd said:
As I have stated would you rather bring on Maf or an unknown in Sambou...it may not work same as Maf but equally it may just work as a stop gap before TM identifies another striker to bring in
Click to expand...

I agree, mate, I'd rather give the young lads a run out instead of MAF.
 

stevefloyd

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 27, 2016
  • #47
And having one of our own thro the ranks just somehow feels so much better
 

Hobo

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 27, 2016
  • #48
stevefloyd said:
And having one of our own thro the ranks just somehow feels so much better
Click to expand...

I couldn't agree more...but the timing needs to be right. Next year seems to be more likely pre season for him and Thomas.
 

no_loyalty

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 27, 2016
  • #49
Lets loan Bassala to Arsenal and keep recalling him for youth cup games
 

Brylowes

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 28, 2016
  • #50
stevefloyd said:
As I have stated would you rather bring on Maf or an unknown in Sambou...it may not work same as Maf but equally it may just work as a stop gap before TM identifies another striker to bring in
Click to expand...
But that's the point i keep making. Sambou isn't Unknown to TM and he deems him not to be ready/good enough & that's his job & what we pay him for
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 28, 2016
  • #51
Bassala might be promising, but considering our relative lack of goals of late (take away his goals at Crewe and Armstrong is really struggling), it's a big ask for him to come in with the expectation that he'll hit the ground running. Wait for the (hopeful) upturn in form and introduce him when we're winning games.
 
T

tom88

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 28, 2016
  • #52
Bassala might be promising, but considering our relative lack of goals of late (take away his goals at Crewe and Armstrong is really struggling), it's a big ask for him to come in with the expectation that he'll hit the ground running. Wait for the (hopeful) upturn in form and introduce him when we're winning games.
Click to expand...

Why take away the Crewe goals?

Its like people stating earlier on in the season - Where would we be in the league if you take away our first 4 games?
 
H

Huckerby

Guest
  • Jan 28, 2016
  • #53
fernandopartridge said:
Bassala might be promising, but considering our relative lack of goals of late (take away his goals at Crewe and Armstrong is really struggling), it's a big ask for him to come in with the expectation that he'll hit the ground running. Wait for the (hopeful) upturn in form and introduce him when we're winning games.
Click to expand...
Lol. Take them away
 

Brylowes

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 28, 2016
  • #54
tom88 said:
Why take away the Crewe goals?

Its like people stating earlier on in the season - Where would we be in the league if you take away our first 4 games?
Click to expand...
Yeah and was a bit unlucky against Walsall as well
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 28, 2016
  • #55
tom88 said:
Why take away the Crewe goals?

Its like people stating earlier on in the season - Where would we be in the league if you take away our first 4 games?
Click to expand...
No, he's got a point. If every goal of Armstrong's had hit the post or been saved he wouldn't have any goals at all!
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 28, 2016
  • #56
Otis said:
No, he's got a point. If every goal of Armstrong's had hit the post or been saved he wouldn't have any goals at all!
Click to expand...

He's scored in two of his last 10 games.
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 28, 2016
  • #57
Grendel said:
He's scored in two of his last 10 games.
Click to expand...
Not if they'd been saved he wouldn't have.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 28, 2016
  • #58
tom88 said:
Why take away the Crewe goals?

Its like people stating earlier on in the season - Where would we be in the league if you take away our first 4 games?
Click to expand...

I don't care. The fact is that Armstrong isn't scoring regularly now like he was earlier on this season. He's failed to score in 7 of his last 8 games.
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 28, 2016
  • #59
tom88 said:
Why take away the Crewe goals?

Its like people stating earlier on in the season - Where would we be in the league if you take away our first 4 games?
Click to expand...

Because in the last 10 games the Crewe game has been the exception rather than the rule. Only 6 goals in the other 9 games. There has been a general feeling that we've struggle to create and score goals, which Crewe aside is evidenced.
 

Brylowes

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 28, 2016
  • #60
Grendel said:
He's scored in two of his last 10 games.
Click to expand...
Which means :well not much at all really. It's hardly a drought more a lack of form and fluidity from the midfield which in turn comes from an unsettled back 4.
 
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 28, 2016
  • #61
Brylowes said:
Which means :well not much at all really. It's hardly a drought more a lack of form and fluidity from the midfield which in turn comes from an unsettled back 4.
Click to expand...
Or a rotated midfield.
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 28, 2016
  • #62
stupot07 said:
Because in the last 10 games the Crewe game has been the exception rather than the rule. Only 6 goals in the other 9 games. There has been a general feeling that we've struggle to create and score goals, which Crewe aside is evidenced.
Click to expand...
Well I said at the time of the Crewe game, that there were some very bad errors by Crewe that though not gifting us goals, certainly gave us relatively easy chances on goal, the two Armstrong ones from open play in particular.

Crewe's defence were awful so that does need to be taken into account.
 

Hobo

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 28, 2016
  • #63
fernandopartridge said:
I don't care. The fact is that Armstrong isn't scoring regularly now like he was earlier on this season. He's failed to score in 7 of his last 8 games.
Click to expand...

From what I have seen the problem is the providers rather than the goal scorer. Every time we have come close to scoring it has been long range from outside the box. Armstrong seems left to try and conjure up his own chances.
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 28, 2016
  • #64
Hobo said:
From what I have seen the problem is the providers rather than the goal scorer. Every time we have come close to scoring it has been long range from outside the box. Armstrong seems left to try and conjure up his own chances.
Click to expand...
Yep, it's the service to Armstrong rather than Armstrong himself. If he was missing stacks of chances then it would be different, but we're hardly giving him the ball in good positions at all.
 

skybluebeduff

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 28, 2016
  • #65
Pompey are looking at the lad for loan, so I have been told.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 28, 2016
  • #66
Hobo said:
From what I have seen the problem is the providers rather than the goal scorer. Every time we have come close to scoring it has been long range from outside the box. Armstrong seems left to try and conjure up his own chances.
Click to expand...

I suppose, but my point stands. Armstrong is struggling and so would Bassala at the moment. Classic SBT to pick up on one line out of context.
 

Brylowes

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 28, 2016
  • #67
skybluebeduff said:
Pompey are looking at the lad for loan, so I have been told.
Click to expand...
Would be a good loan IMO. Drop a division to a good footballing team who are challenging at the right end-see how he goes & get him back in the summer
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Jan 28, 2016
  • #68
Hobo said:
From what I have seen the problem is the providers rather than the goal scorer. Every time we have come close to scoring it has been long range from outside the box. Armstrong seems left to try and conjure up his own chances.
Click to expand...

That's a fine reason not to bring a young untried kid in though, and tar him for life as being unable to score.
 

stevefloyd

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 29, 2016
  • #69
I did say use him as a stop gap and ffs he has to be better than MAF surely
 

Brylowes

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 29, 2016
  • #70
stevefloyd said:
I did say use him as a stop gap and ffs he has to be better than MAF surely
Click to expand...
He will get his chance: we have to trust those in a position to judge best when that might be.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 5 (members: 0, guests: 5)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?