According to Transfers To Be on Twitter which claims to be 'Anonymous Football agent. In contact daily with the majority of the 92 English League clubs.', Nottingham Forest will make a bid for Coventry City captain Carl Baker.
With the Sky Blues being plunged to new depths by SISU and everyone else involved in the sorry tale which has escalated over the close season, there are concerns as to whether the club will actually start the season and rumours linking City players elsewhere are bound to occur.
Transfers To Be @TransfersToBe
Nottingham Forest will make a bid for Coventry City's Carl Baker this week #nffc #skyblues
Can't see it myself, he's not good enough to play top end of the championship
Like I said on another thread, I'd definitely consider a bid for Baker.
Like I said on another thread, I'd definitely consider a bid for Baker.
Damn you got there first.:facepalm:Like I said on another thread, I'd definitely consider a bid for Baker.
I'd Imagine his confidence would be right up after a season like he's had .Never given a consistent run in the 1st elelven when he arrived ,was that under Coleman.Was our player of the year I believe he would make a good championship player in a good team.
He has never had that here.
I'd Imagine his confidence would be right up after a season like he's had .Never given a consistent run in the 1st elelven when he arrived ,was that under Coleman.
Not good enough for to play in the bottom half of the Championship either, two and a half seasons showed that.
Good League One player, nothing better than that though.
I bet you would of considered a bid for Ricky Lambert when Southampton got promoted to the prem :facepalm:
Yes I would've, but I wouldn't have sold him, he's a worthy sub and has proven he's got the goal scoring instinct that is needed at any level to score goals. Comparing Baker to Lambert is stupid, Baker has had 1 good season since joining us in 2010/11 (?), Lambert has scored 20+ goals in every season in every league for S'hampton (except in the prem, but still got an impressive 15) so to compare the 2 does a massive injustice to Lambert. How do we know last season wasn't a fluke for Baker? After all, he scored 5 (of 12) goals in the space of November and December and from then, like the rest of the team to be fair, fizzled out somewhat.
Every man has his price, he's a top earner, quite inconsistent, and at 30, you'd have to
He scored shed loads when he was in League One previously, League One is his level.
There is no way in the World he is going to Nottingham Forest.
Damn you got there first.:facepalm:
I'd be gutted and fear he'd be missed more than is realised .
These are now your battles or approvals to make as one of the 3000 travellers.
He must be one of the four players on +8k/wk ... the others being Clarke, Bell and Sheffers. We should keep Clarke and Baker.
It was an example. Not comparing the two at all. Hears food for thought tho, baker up top
I said that after the Walsall game to the lads I went with - wasn't met well!
I wouldn't play him upfront now, but when we had no Clarke (and hopeless replacements) he was the only player with goals in the squad, so it was a viable option IMO.
sisu cashing in on what they can before they go ?
"loses of 45-70 million"...Cashing in on 250k tops for Baker ?
Yeah, £1/4M is not to be sniffed at.
Anyway, even £45M is bull, it will be more like £25M IMHO.
It's probably closer to 40m than 25m, about 10m has been spent on transfer fees alone.
It's probably closer to 40m than 25m, about 10m has been spent on transfer fees alone.
"loses of 45-70 million"...Cashing in on 250k tops for Baker ?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?