Ccfcisparks
Well-Known Member
I think with Lati being here, we are going to sign one or the other and Lati will be backup as the one we dont sign.
Which would you prefer of the two?
Which would you prefer of the two?
I'd actually prefer Lati as a backup CB, i think he's better there, offers very little as a RB. So its RB for me.I think with Lati being here, we are going to sign one or the other and Lati will be backup as the one we dont sign.
Which would you prefer of the two?
With Wright and Sheaf leaving I reckon we'll sign another 8 players before the window closes. Let's hope all those new players can gel.
Get the CM sorted first, that's far more important for us to get right. Lats isn't great in either position, so I'd prefer a proper experienced CB, if we need to, we have Eccles + others who can fill in at RB.
This is now the conundrum. Sell Sheaf and fund all the remaining positions or stick with what we have and hope Viktor and Hamer get sold.Could obvs do with both in an ideal world but I’d go backup RB first over CB as I think we’re much weaker when Van Ewijk doesn’t play.
This is now the conundrum. Sell Sheaf and fund all the remaining positions or stick with what we have and hope Viktor and Hamer get sold.
So like a normal squad then. 2 players for each position = 22. 20 spaces available on a match day. All teams have this issue and why these teams dont break down fitness wise come MarchI think the squad is almost in danger of becoming too bloated, certainly if we signed a RB and and a CB (I know the thread title asks either/or).
Who's going to drop out of the squad and be happy about it? I think if you leave it as is then you have Lati on the bench to cover RB and CB, plus Kitching and Dasilva.
I don't see us having 4 defensive subs on the bench so one of those (or the new signing) is going to get left out when at full strength. If we sign a RB and CB then two are going to be left out.
So like a normal squad then. 2 players for each position = 22. 20 spaces available on a match day. All teams have this issue and why these teams dont break down fitness wise come March
Who are you counting tho in the 25?Yes but we currently have a squad of 25, so two more and we're potentially overstocked.
Who are you counting tho in the 25?
Why can't Bidwell play all season , injuries asideThe problem area is LB. Bidwell cannot play all season and Dasilva is just not good enough
Should we sign the players we want Burroughs and the fellow youngsters wont be needed in the 22-25 squad thoughIt's the club's first team squad, not trying to catch you out or anything.
The only one in there who is unlikely to get any game time is Howley.
Possibly Burroughs, though I think with no more signings he would get some minutes. (And it depends whether MR really wants 3 senior keepers)
I am not sure that is the most important question. For me it's is Bidwell better than van Ewijk. I know most won't agree but I think van Ewijk is our best player and Bidwell our weakest potential starter.The real question is whether Lati is a better right back than Dasilva is left back.I believe he is. So I’d rather have a lb
The problem area is LB. Bidwell cannot play all season and Dasilva is just not good enough
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?