Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Football & Other Sports
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Back to being the biggest club in Coventry? (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter Grendel
  • Start date Oct 23, 2015
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • …
  • 69
Next
First Prev 45 of 69 Next Last

Nick

Administrator
  • Jan 12, 2016
  • #1,541
Steve.B50 said:
This thread is so boring its like a merry go round.

We have two games ahead of us that could map out our future yet some are still going on about something we cannot change.
Click to expand...

So people can't talk about things but then go to the Football later? Or talk about football on other threads.
 
S

Steve.B50

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 12, 2016
  • #1,542
Nick said:
So people can't talk about things but then go to the Football later? Or talk about football on other threads.
Click to expand...

Its just the same things over and over again though.
We cant change what's happened, regardless if its right or wrong.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 12, 2016
  • #1,543
SkyBlueZack said:
How many others apart from Tony agree with you Italia? How many others are desperate for us to have a 10 year deal? Desperate for us to use their ticketing system? You lose the argument by being a hypocrite. People only respond out of sheer frustration at the hypocrisy. I imagine the SISU plan is to be as successful as possible. Like most clubs. After all it is the only way they will get their investment back or some of it. The council also used the club as cannon fodder for years and got away with it without a challenge. Yet your very quiet about that? Again another show of hypocrisy and double standards.
Click to expand...

How am I with Italia?
 

italiahorse

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 12, 2016
  • #1,544
skybluetony176 said:
How am I with Italia?
Click to expand...

There's a channel of thought on here that can't be questioned. If you do you will be paired up with outcasts like me.
 
S

SkyBlueZack

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 12, 2016
  • #1,545
Bit melodramatic. You both have a similar opinion which contrasts to others. Who was it that used to say there were six people on the same side or something similarly childish? To ostracise the six from other people perhaps? For having a differing opinion.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 12, 2016
  • #1,546
italiahorse said:
If we were moving from renting stadiums in Coventry (in the 50's) to Nuneaton to Tamworth to Rugby to Cannock you might reconsider if they bought a stadium in Kettering.
Click to expand...

That's not really right. It would be more like us playing in Coventry in a stadium we owned / part owned from inception until 2002 then moving temporarily to Northampton as tennants, promising to return to Coventry. Then after 10 years renting moving to an empty Reebok in Bolton. Would that be OK?
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 12, 2016
  • #1,547
SkyBlueZack said:
Bit melodramatic. You both have a similar opinion which contrasts to others. Who was it that used to say there were six people on the same side or something similarly childish? To ostracise the six from other people perhaps? For having a differing opinion.
Click to expand...

We both see fault in SISU and are willing to express that. That's where the similarity end's. Funny you say it's in contrast to others because I'm yet to meet a Cov fan who doesn't see fault in SISU. Perhaps it's your opinion that contrasts others?
 
S

SkyBlueZack

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 12, 2016
  • #1,548
Hahaha funny guy!
 

Moff

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 12, 2016
  • #1,549
italiahorse said:
your not in the majority who in reality have never bothered who owns the stadium.
Click to expand...

If you are talking about CCFC fans, then I think you are mistaken.

Judging by the amount of posts on the Ricoh/New Stadium/Potential Stadium on the main forum, I would beg to differ and say the majority do care who owns the stadium, and that many of those want a stadium with the Club so SISU can sell it get there money back, and move on, which is what we all want isnt it?
 

Moff

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 12, 2016
  • #1,550
italiahorse said:
I can't go along with it being the same situations or even being a franchise, other than 'London and surrounding counties' was their home.

- The stadium was empty and Wasps needed one.
Click to expand...

So hypothetically we need a stadium and Rushdens old ground is empty, so you would support such a move?
 

Moff

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 12, 2016
  • #1,551
skybluetony176 said:
How am I with Italia?
Click to expand...

Lovers?
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 12, 2016
  • #1,552
Moff said:
Lovers?
Click to expand...

Can't be. We apparently agree on everything
 

italiahorse

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 12, 2016
  • #1,553
Moff said:
So hypothetically we need a stadium and Rushdens old ground is empty, so you would support such a move?
Click to expand...

We would be worse off so no.
 

James Smith

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 12, 2016
  • #1,554
Moff said:
I would say its possible not unlikely, although we shall wait and see.

Crowds lower than expected, many people underwhelmed by the experience and failing to return, constant reliance on discounts and freebies, coupled with the fact finally CCFC are performing on the pitch and fans are returning to the football club, not deserting to a Rugby Club.

I also note that Wasps are hardly pulling up trees in signing new players, no marquee signings and vetoed by Leigh Halfpenny. Their is a whiff of not having the financial package to attract the best.
Click to expand...

My heart bleeds.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Jan 12, 2016
  • #1,555
Moff said:
although we shall wait and see.
Click to expand...

I do find it interesting how many people have decided so quickly that Wasps are here to stay.

It's the same mindset that had SISU down as excellent owners, with good business sense after they'd been here six months.

Now... as you rightly point out, Wasps *might* be here to stay but... so far who knows! It's certainly true that their stated *intention* is to stay, but then their stated intention was to stay in London/return to London/stay in Wycombe/return to London so the rhetoric is probably as best discounted as anything our owners come up with.

As for actions? Well, they have bought a ground, but they've also heavily loaded it with debt. The results of their attempts to pay that off will determine their immediate future, although who knows if even once that debt is paid off whether they stay, or just flog their community asset to move elsewhere for a similar strategy. Windsor Park might fancy some big name top flight teams after a refurb...

It's too early to decide one way or another whether the great franchise experiment has worked or not.
 

Moff

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 12, 2016
  • #1,556
skybluetony176 said:
Can't be. We apparently agree on everything
Click to expand...

:claping hands:
 

Moff

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 12, 2016
  • #1,557
Deleted member 5849 said:
I do find it interesting how many people have decided so quickly that Wasps are here to stay.

It's the same mindset that had SISU down as excellent owners, with good business sense after they'd been here six months.

Now... as you rightly point out, Wasps *might* be here to stay but... so far who knows! It's certainly true that their stated *intention* is to stay, but then their stated intention was to stay in London/return to London/stay in Wycombe/return to London so the rhetoric is probably as best discounted as anything our owners come up with.

As for actions? Well, they have bought a ground, but they've also heavily loaded it with debt. The results of their attempts to pay that off will determine their immediate future, although who knows if even once that debt is paid off whether they stay, or just flog their community asset to move elsewhere for a similar strategy. Windsor Park might fancy some big name top flight teams after a refurb...

It's too early to decide one way or another whether the great franchise experiment has worked or not.
Click to expand...

I personally see it all ending in tears for Wasps, and I will be honest enough to say I would be more than happy with that, which I am sure people know from my posts.

I dont want them to go out of buisness, just look for something a little more suited to their needs in London eg) 10k max stadium.

I feel that there current experiment isnt quite panning out as they thought it would, and the constant promotions and freebies just isnt creating a new or loyal future ban base.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Jan 12, 2016
  • #1,558
Moff said:
I personally see it all ending in tears for Wasps, and I will be honest enough to say I would be more than happy with that, which I am sure people know from my posts.
Click to expand...

I don't want them to succeed either - the precedent it would set for other sporting teams to do the same would be particularly destrictive and catastrophic.

However... we don't *know* whether they will or not, and often the rhetoric is they're here to stay. Why? They're only here to stay if they succeed financially (and even then possibly not, if it's more viable to flog a successful community asset in the stadium and move elsewhere, banking the difference!) and as of yet it's pointless deciding they are going to be successful.

All I will say is previous efforts (MK Dons apart, and is that 'success' on anything but the broadest terms? They almost went bust soon after moving, too) of clubs being used to fill already exisiting grounds tend not to go overly well.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 12, 2016
  • #1,559
Moff said:
I personally see it all ending in tears for Wasps, and I will be honest enough to say I would be more than happy with that, which I am sure people know from my posts.

I dont want them to go out of buisness, just look for something a little more suited to their needs in London eg) 10k max stadium.

I feel that there current experiment isnt quite panning out as they thought it would, and the constant promotions and freebies just isnt creating a new or loyal future ban base.
Click to expand...

Although I agree with wanting to see them fail I just can't see it. Wasps home match ticket sales isn't the only source of revenue at the Ricoh. The truth is that it is possibly the only true 365day a year sports stadium in the country. Yes ticket revenue will be welcome I'm sure but they have plenty of other revenue streams to be capitalized on to make it successful. I can't help but feel anyone who thinks it's all about bums on seats at wasps home games are setting themselves up to be disappointed.

But I guess none of us will really know until accounts for the whole group are filled that covers a full 12 month period since Wasps have arrived where they're also liable to make interest payments on the bonds, also until that happens we'll also have no idea if the prospect of paying the bonds back at the end of the term is viable. Even then there are alternatives to paying back the bonds. So you'll forgive me if I don't start creaming myself just yet, I want to see how things are officially panning out first.
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Jan 12, 2016
  • #1,560
skybluetony176 said:
The truth is that it is possibly the only true 365day a year sports stadium in the country.
Click to expand...

Really?
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 12, 2016
  • #1,561
Nick said:
Really?
Click to expand...

An utterly bizarre statement.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 12, 2016
  • #1,562
skybluetony176 said:
Wasps home match ticket sales isn't the only source of revenue at the Ricoh. The truth is that it is possibly the only true 365day a year sports stadium in the country.
Click to expand...

Despite the fact Fisher, and Wasps for that matter, are always banging on about revenues what you've got is a rugby club who have been losing millions for years, and have taken on tens of millions of additional debt, and a stadium company who have been struggling and also losing money.

I don't see how putting the two together automatically leads to a bright successful future for both.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 12, 2016
  • #1,563
Nick said:
Really?
Click to expand...

Grendel said:
An utterly bizarre statement.
Click to expand...

Can either of you think of another ground with casino, hotel, exhibition hall etc?
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Jan 12, 2016
  • #1,564
skybluetony176 said:
Can either of you think of another ground with casino, hotel, exhibition hall etc?
Click to expand...

That wasn't your statement was it? You were talking about 365 days a year, I am pretty sure there will be a few stadiums that make money every day. Which is revenue 365 days a year.

Copying Italia there with making a bullshit statement and then moving the goalposts when somebodys picks up on it.
 

covmark

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 12, 2016
  • #1,565
Nick said:
That wasn't your statement was it? You were talking about 365 days a year, I am pretty sure there will be a few stadiums that make money every day. Which is revenue 365 days a year.

Copying Italia there with making a bullshit statement and then moving the goalposts when somebodys picks up on it.
Click to expand...
Must be a duplicate account

Sent from my HTC One_M8 using Tapatalk
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 12, 2016
  • #1,566
chiefdave said:
Despite the fact Fisher, and Wasps for that matter, are always banging on about revenues what you've got is a rugby club who have been losing millions for years, and have taken on tens of millions of additional debt, and a stadium company who have been struggling and also losing money.

I don't see how putting the two together automatically leads to a bright successful future for both.
Click to expand...

In which case if you truly believe what you've just posted you must be delighted that we didn't buy it. Given that we're a football club that's been losing millions for years and has tens of millions historical debt.

Surely using your logic it would have been a recipe for disaster.
 

italiahorse

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 12, 2016
  • #1,567
Nick said:
That wasn't your statement was it? You were talking about 365 days a year, I am pretty sure there will be a few stadiums that make money every day. Which is revenue 365 days a year.

Copying Italia there with making a bullshit statement and then moving the goalposts when somebodys picks up on it.
Click to expand...

Never changed my statement. You just don't understand the details.

If you count selling a ticket from a room at a stadium as 365 day income then every stadium is 365 days a year.
You know what he means by 365 days at the Ricoh you just struggle again with the obvious detail.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 12, 2016
  • #1,568
Nick said:
That wasn't your statement was it? You were talking about 365 days a year, I am pretty sure there will be a few stadiums that make money every day. Which is revenue 365 days a year.

Copying Italia there with making a bullshit statement and then moving the goalposts when somebodys picks up on it.
Click to expand...

Name them "few stadiums" then and give a brief overview of how they generate that 365 day a year revenue.

And no I didn't move the goal posts. I actually said in my OP that "they have plenty of other revenue streams to be capitalized
on". Now if you're unaware of the other revenue streams that are available at the Ricoh that's down to you, nothing to do with moving goal posts. It's a good job I was available to point them out to you.
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Jan 12, 2016
  • #1,569
italiahorse said:
Never changed my statement. You just don't understand the details.

If you count selling a ticket from a room at a stadium as 365 day income then every stadium is 365 days a year.
You know what he means by 365 days at the Ricoh you just struggle again with the obvious detail.
Click to expand...

It doesn't have to have a Hotel, Casino and Exhibition all to make money every day does it? Other stadiums have hotels for example. Other stadiums have functions and exhibitions.

It was an incorrect statement, which then changed.
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Jan 12, 2016
  • #1,570
skybluetony176 said:
Name them "few stadiums" then and give a brief overview of how they generate that 365 day a year revenue.

And no I didn't move the goal posts. I actually said in my OP that "they have plenty of other revenue streams to be capitalized
on". Now if you're unaware of the other revenue streams that are available at the Ricoh that's down to you, nothing to do with moving goal posts. It's a good job I was available to point them out to you.
Click to expand...

Erm, you said
The truth is that it is possibly the only true 365day a year sports stadium in the country.
Click to expand...

Which is incorrect, so you then moved it to having a hotel, casino and exhibition hall.

Without checking others, don't Blackpool have a hotel, gym, restaurant and conference centre? I'd class that as 365 revenue. I think Upton Park has a hotel too and conference centre as well.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Jan 12, 2016
  • #1,571
skybluetony176 said:
In which case if you truly believe what you've just posted you must be delighted that we didn't buy it.
Click to expand...

Fisher could still be proved right that Wasps paid too much...
 

italiahorse

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 12, 2016
  • #1,572
Nick said:
It doesn't have to have a Hotel, Casino and Exhibition all to make money every day does it? Other stadiums have hotels for example. Other stadiums have functions and exhibitions.

It was an incorrect statement, which then changed.
Click to expand...

So the new stadium will have a hotel ?
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 12, 2016
  • #1,573
Nick said:
Erm, you said

Which is incorrect, so you then moved it to having a hotel, casino and exhibition hall.

Without checking others, don't Blackpool have a hotel, gym, restaurant and conference centre? I'd class that as 365 revenue.
Click to expand...

If you're going to quote me at least have the decency to quote the point in it's entirety, did you stop reading after that one line or something? What I said in full was "The truth is that it is possibly the only true 365day a year sports stadium in the country. Yes ticket revenue will be welcome I'm sure but they have plenty of other revenue streams to be capitalized on to make it successful."

Like I said, if you're unaware (which apparently you are) what other revenue is at the Ricoh that's down to you, you should try getting up there and having a look around. It's quite impressive how much is there and what it has to offer.
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Jan 12, 2016
  • #1,574
italiahorse said:
So the new stadium will have a hotel ?
Click to expand...

Was that the statement? Did I say it would have a hotel, or was I just saying that the Ricoh wasn't the only stadium with 365 revenues as made out.

Again, talking shit and then randomly changing it.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
  • Jan 12, 2016
  • #1,575
Deleted member 5849 said:
Fisher could still be proved right that Wasps paid too much...
Click to expand...

He could. If you throw enough shit something is going to stick sooner than later
 
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • …
  • 69
Next
First Prev 45 of 69 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Football & Other Sports
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?