Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Attendance 2204! (4 Viewers)

  • Thread starter shoesmith81
  • Start date Aug 11, 2013
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3

James Smith

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 11, 2013
  • #71
Greggs said:
you missed a cracker today. The only soul that remains in ccfc rest with the players. It wouldn't make sense not to support them.
Click to expand...

I watched an eleven goal thriller at the Ricoh and enjoyed every minute of it. If I can make an away game midweek I'll go and support them, just not going to go anywhere near Sixfields.
 

cloughie

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 11, 2013
  • #72
lordsummerisle said:
As are those who provide ACL with revenue from food,,drink and parking.

Need to starve them both back into talks, if they get their food,drink and parking money in without the team then what incentive is there for them to want the club back?
Click to expand...

well according to some yesterday the bars etc were not open at 6 flds, if true, and I am happy to be corrected by the few that went, then food and beverage issue is rubbish
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Aug 11, 2013
  • #73
cloughie said:
well according to some yesterday the bars etc were not open at 6 flds, if true, and I am happy to be corrected by the few that went, then food and beverage issue is rubbish
Click to expand...

The point has never been that Sixfields offers an immediate gain, that has never been SISU's argument.
 

cloughie

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 11, 2013
  • #74
saxon_exile said:
Pic from another angle on the attendance:
Click to expand...
strange how a newbie posts an old picture of northampton and not todays game ,
quite sad that they are having to stoop to such ridiculous claims , actually embarrassing
 
C

CCFC PimpRail

New Member
  • Aug 11, 2013
  • #75
How can fans whinge about Sexfields being empty when the Red-ko is lucky to be half full....?
 

James Smith

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 11, 2013
  • #76
sisu go home said:
Why? For supporting in their own way? It's typical that once you're bored of moaning about Sisu and ACL, people start looking for someone new, until they feel they've been heard. Usually it's the manager they turn on at some point, but in our situation it's fans turning on fans. If you believe the best way out of this is to starve Sisu of money, fair enough go for it, but don't have a go at supporters who may think differently to you and would like to pay our player's wages. This isn't the fucking 80s mining strikes, people's lives don't depend on the picket line so can this stop now and we all get on with prgress.
2 of my mates went today - had a wicked day! Everyone who went to the Ricoh for the charity match - did you know ACL charged them for it, on top of taking the revenue for food/drink? Who's pockets do you line - ACL/Sisu - they're evidentally both corrupt.
I'm not ever going to Sixfields, but I envy those who did today, and I don't hold anything against them.
Click to expand...

Have you got any proof that ACL charged them (by which I assume you mean the Former Players Association) anything? Only the announcement at the end said everyone had given up their time for free. Even the groundsman played in goal and must have been horrified by the pitch invasion at the end.
 
V

valiant15

New Member
  • Aug 11, 2013
  • #77
What a bunch of judas cunts.
 

Sky Blue Harry H

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 11, 2013
  • #78
Deleted member 5849 said:
The point has never been that Sixfields offers an immediate gain, that has never been SISU's argument.
Click to expand...

......................what is it that Sixfields offers? ( not a medium term gain, or a long term gain..........from where I'm standing)
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Aug 11, 2013
  • #79
Sky Blue Harry H said:
......................what is it that Sixfields offers? ( not a medium term gain, or a long term gain..........from where I'm standing)
Click to expand...

It offers a negotiating hand and a breaking of the monopoly of supply.
 
T

theferret

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 11, 2013
  • #80
cloughie said:
strange how a newbie posts an old picture of northampton and not todays game ,
quite sad that they are having to stoop to such ridiculous claims , actually embarrassing
Click to expand...

That IS today's game you fool.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Aug 11, 2013
  • #81
valiant15 said:
Shame it didn't burn with the scab twats in it.
Click to expand...

You really are an odious fellow.
 

CCFC Germany

Active Member
  • Aug 11, 2013
  • #82
Just for comparism :
Northampton had 3.400 and 4.300 for their first two home matches...
 

cloughie

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 11, 2013
  • #83
theferret said:
That IS today's game you fool.
Click to expand...


if so then that is a shame they didn't take a picture of the other empty sides

Must admit I forgot it will look full in 1 end when the stadium holds 7/8,000

So it was you who took the photo was it ?

or are you easily fooled

going on your previous postings i know where i would put my money
 

James Smith

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 11, 2013
  • #84
theferret said:
I wouldn't hold your breath.

I can understand the Sixfields boycott and what it is trying to achieve (even if I think it will make no real difference). I can understand protests and the march into Broadgate was a wonderful statement. The big ACL love-in today though (and for some that's what it was - at least in part) I do not get at all.
Click to expand...

Nope sadly I don't think it will make much of a difference as if the ACL statement that Joy won't allow our club to come back to our home unless she owns it at her price - we're stuck at Sixfields. We have no idea what she actually named as her price and for all we know it could be a tin of Pringles, A Bacardi Breezer and two train tickets to Bescot Stadium, or £200m. If it was the former (or close to that) then it's hardly surprising that the council told them where to go, if it was the latter the council would have been daft to say no. Does anyone seriously think it was the latter figure or anything close to it?

Also I notice that SISU haven't denied any of that statement now this could be because they're worried about contempt of court but I wasn't aware that they had lodged an appeal, anyone know?
 
T

theferret

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 11, 2013
  • #85
cloughie said:
if so then that is a shame they didn't take a picture of the other empty sides

Must admit I forgot it will look full in 1 end when the stadium holds 7/8,000

So it was you who took the photo was it ?

or are you easily fooled

going on your previous postings i know where i would put my money
Click to expand...

What are you talking about? No I didn't take the picture, but it was clearly taken by someone who was stood on the hill. The fact that you can't see the other parts of the ground is precisely because that person was STOOD ON THE HILL and didn't have a camera that can see around corners. Although there are plenty of pictures showing the empty stands if you want to look at them and make yourself feel better.

Why does that picture make you so angry anyway? The published attendance states that there were less than 1K there. The fact that the picture, taken from a distance, at an angle and by the looks of it, just after city have scored (hence people are on their feet), makes it look like the stand was better populated than it was is of no relevance whatsoever. There were LESS than 1k city fans there. That is good, isn't it?
 

James Smith

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 11, 2013
  • #86
Deleted member 5849 said:
It offers a negotiating hand and a breaking of the monopoly of supply.
Click to expand...

Except if ACL decide to say bugger off then and stay in Northampton, we've got a business to run and as you obviously aren't coming back on reasonable terms* we will be doing something else on Saturday afternoons and the pitch. I seriously doubt SISU want to be stuck with a homeless third division football club, or that they'll build the White Elephant stadium to bring us back home.

* assuming the ACL statement is correct.
 
Last edited: Aug 11, 2013
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Aug 11, 2013
  • #87
James Smith said:
I seriously doubt SISU want to be stuck with a homeless third division football club
Click to expand...

Indeed.

Hence from their POV why they need to break the monopoly.
 

James Smith

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 11, 2013
  • #88
Deleted member 5849 said:
Indeed.

Hence from their POV why they need to break the monopoly.
Click to expand...

Yeah but we still haven't seen the plans for the White Elephant stadium which would allow them to do this and Tim promised them ages ago. Where are they?
 
S

SkyBlueBlood

Member
  • Aug 11, 2013
  • #89
2204 tickets sold or distributed free of charge? The acid test would be if they published gate receipts, but they seem to have problems with financial reporting.
 
S

SkyBlueBlood

Member
  • Aug 11, 2013
  • #90
CCFC Germany said:
Just for comparism :
Northampton had 3.400 and 4.300 for their first two home matches...
Click to expand...

Yes but they actually played their home matches at home.
 

CCFC Germany

Active Member
  • Aug 11, 2013
  • #91
SkyBlueBlood said:
Yes but they actually played their home matches at home.
Click to expand...

I do know about that !
Just wanted to say that the boycott is working, but it might be better...
 
H

Houdi

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 11, 2013
  • #92
James Smith said:
Except if ACL decide to say bugger off then and stay in Northampton, we've got a business to run and as you obviously aren't coming back on reasonable terms* we will be doing something else on Saturday afternoons and the pitch. I seriously doubt SISU want to be stuck with a homeless third division football club, or that they'll build the White Elephant stadium to bring us back home.

* assuming the ACL statement is correct.
Click to expand...
I don't believe there is a chance in hell that ACL will agree any type of sale to SISU, a new rental deal yes, but things have gone far too far for any even partial sale. It is equally as hard to see how Fisher could possibly do a volte face and suddenly agree any type of rental deal. Virtually no one seriously believes Fisher's new stadium 'promise'. Rugby council apparently have not had any approach re planning concerning any new stadium build. Increasingly it looks the club will be marooned at Northampton, until SISU finally accept the games over, trouble is by then how low will we have sunk.
 
S

sisu go home

New Member
  • Aug 11, 2013
  • #93
James Smith said:
Have you got any proof that ACL charged them (by which I assume you mean the Former Players Association) anything? Only the announcement at the end said everyone had given up their time for free. Even the groundsman played in goal and must have been horrified by the pitch invasion at the end.
Click to expand...

Yep - mate of mine works internally. We're talking tens of thousands.
 

James Smith

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 11, 2013
  • #94
Houdi said:
I don't believe there is a chance in hell that ACL will agree any type of sale to SISU, a new rental deal yes, but things have gone far too far for any even partial sale. It is equally as hard to see how Fisher could possibly do a volte face and suddenly agree any type of rental deal. Virtually no one seriously believes Fisher's new stadium 'promise'. Rugby council apparently have not had any approach re planning concerning any new stadium build. Increasingly it looks the club will be marooned at Northampton, until SISU finally accept the games over, trouble is by then how low will we have sunk.
Click to expand...
If the plan is to distress ACL then I can't see Joy sanctioning any rental deal as from her point of view she has the same aim as a portion of the fans NOPM (just to ACL). If the plan is to actually build the White Elephant then why distress your own income by moving to Sixfields whilst you do so?
 

James Smith

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 11, 2013
  • #95
sisu go home said:
Yep - mate of mine works internally. We're talking tens of thousands.
Click to expand...

That's not proof that's another claim which isn't backed up. If there were 7000 there today at £5 a head the charities maximum income would be 35,000 and you claim ACL charged over half of this in rent?

Will believe it when I see or hear it confirmed by the CCFPA.
 
Last edited: Aug 11, 2013
T

theferret

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 11, 2013
  • #96
James Smith said:
If the plan is to distress ACL then I can't see Joy sanctioning any rental deal as from her point of view she has the same aim as a portion of the fans NOPM (just to ACL). If the plan is to actually build the White Elephant then why distress your own income by moving to Sixfields whilst you do so?
Click to expand...

The more you try and make sense of it, the less sense it makes. I heard a couple of whispers earlier about takeover talks. No more than whispers though amongst the corporate stiffs today, but that has only come second hand. You just have to hope it's true.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Aug 11, 2013
  • #97
theferret said:
The more you try and make sense of it, the less sense it makes. I heard a couple of whispers earlier about takeover talks. No more than whispers though amongst the corporate stiffs today, but that has only come second hand. You just have to hope it's true.
Click to expand...

The only hope we have is it focusses minds where they weren't previously that clubs and stadiums should never be split.

And that once minds are focussed elsewhere, it gives enough of a boost in value to the club that it makes it worth selling.
 

cloughie

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 11, 2013
  • #98
theferret said:
What are you talking about? No I didn't take the picture, but it was clearly taken by someone who was stood on the hill. The fact that you can't see the other parts of the ground is precisely because that person was STOOD ON THE HILL and didn't have a camera that can see around corners. Although there are plenty of pictures showing the empty stands if you want to look at them and make yourself feel better.

Why does that picture make you so angry anyway
? The published attendance states that there were less than 1K there. The fact that the picture, taken from a distance, at an angle and by the looks of it, just after city have scored (hence people are on their feet), makes it look like the stand was better populated than it was is of no relevance whatsoever. There were LESS than 1k city fans there. That is good, isn't it?
Click to expand...


who's angry sounds like you

I'm quite happy in my stance of never going into sixfields
 
T

theferret

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 11, 2013
  • #99
cloughie said:
who's angry sounds like you

I'm quite happy in my stance of never going into sixfields
Click to expand...

So your stance is the same as mine then. Well done.

I merely pointed out that you made a bit of a fool of yourself by declaring the picture a fake when it is clearly from today, and you then started bleating on about my posting history, suggested I was the photographer and ranted about the angle the picture was taken from (as though I was somehow to blame for your mistake). It was a pretty bonkers post.

But hey, the fact I'm arguing about this nonsense at 11pm on a Sunday night suggests I too have lost the ability to think rationally, so don't be too hard on yourself.
 
B

Broken Hearted Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 11, 2013
  • #100
CCFC PimpRail said:
How can fans whinge about Sexfields being empty when the Red-ko is lucky to be half full....?
Click to expand...

Theres a bit of a difference Ricoh half full 16300 Sixfields empty 0 does that help:thinking about:
 
B

Bré

Guest
  • Aug 12, 2013
  • #101
Well done to my fellow LOYAL Sky Blue supporters at Sixfields today.:claping hands:
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 12, 2013
  • #102
cloughie said:
who's angry sounds like you

I'm quite happy in my stance of never going into sixfields
Click to expand...

Backtrack, backtrack, slither, slither.....

I assume you'll apologise and admit the picture was from today?
 
V

valiant15

New Member
  • Aug 12, 2013
  • #103
There was 908 'city fans' at sixfields. How embarrassing.
 

skybluelee

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 12, 2013
  • #104
Bré said:
Well done to my fellow LOYAL Sky Blue supporters at Sixfields today.:claping hands:
Click to expand...

You support Coventry presumably? Yet you come on here 'clapping and smiling' about the darkest day in our club's history.

I award you the title, 'twat of the day'. And thats no mean feat on this forum.
 
M

Matty_CCFC

New Member
  • Aug 12, 2013
  • #105
Bré said:
Well done to my fellow LOYAL Sky Blue supporters at Sixfields today.:claping hands:
Click to expand...

We are all Loyal Supporters, will never knock anyone for making a choice but those who went I wouold clas a rather Stupid, you must know that by going to Sixfields and supporting our owners your killing the club in Coventry. They will never come back if waeker fans like you follow them in Northampton.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 5 (members: 0, guests: 5)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?